Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Наножемчуг

Channel

Наножемчуг

@nanopearl

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,253subscribers

-83 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001077834314
TypeChannel
Username@nanopearl
DescriptionЮвелирное бюро MNDLVCH — Надя @jeweleditor Катя @probirkina Заметки о драгоценностях и украшения с самоцветами по индивидуальному заказу. https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67ac70763c3e6d7843a2c21e
Created23 September 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nanopearl

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,24215,34915,295.56 August 2026 — 15,336 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,336 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,335 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,333 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,331 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,325 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,320 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,322 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,321 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,324 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,323 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,329 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,324 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,326 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,327 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,325 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,320 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,337 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,345 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,342 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,343 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,349 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,347 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,340 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,339 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,335 subscribers7 September 2026 — 15,332 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,329 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,328 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,341 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,339 subscribers18 September 2026 — 15,335 subscribers1 October 2026 — 15,319 subscribers6 October 2026 — 15,301 subscribers10 October 2026 — 15,296 subscribers13 October 2026 — 15,284 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,278 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,280 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,275 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,274 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,272 subscribers20 October 2026 — 15,265 subscribers21 October 2026 — 15,260 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,263 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,261 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,263 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,260 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,256 subscribers28 October 2026 — 15,246 subscribers29 October 2026 — 15,242 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,243 subscribers31 October 2026 — 15,249 subscribers1 November 2026 — 15,257 subscribers3 November 2026 — 15,256 subscribers6 November 2026 — 15,253 subscribers15,2536 August 20266 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 92 days, net -83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,226–15,365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 01:5115,253-3
3 Nov 2026, 22:3615,256-1
1 Nov 2026, 16:4915,257+8
31 Oct 2026, 20:0115,249+6
30 Oct 2026, 18:1815,243+1
29 Oct 2026, 18:2715,242-4
28 Oct 2026, 20:0115,246-10
27 Oct 2026, 17:0015,256-4
26 Oct 2026, 18:2015,260-3
25 Oct 2026, 16:4615,263+2
23 Oct 2026, 21:4015,261-2
22 Oct 2026, 18:4615,263+3
21 Oct 2026, 12:3615,260-5
20 Oct 2026, 09:4615,265-7
19 Oct 2026, 06:4515,272-2
18 Oct 2026, 05:3915,274-1
17 Oct 2026, 04:0515,275-5
16 Oct 2026, 07:0515,280+2
15 Oct 2026, 04:2615,278-6
13 Oct 2026, 22:3615,284first reading

Engagement

72 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.7%
avg views ÷ 15,253 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,160
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 72 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held72 (30 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total63,110
Reactions total2,219
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 05:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,260
Videos
≈1,240
Links
≈635

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 14s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,589 reactions across 71 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8,45198.4%
💩1381.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,697 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,700 views96 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Ну и давайте немного тяжелого люкса. Этот камень в Москве. Семь каратов! Без облагораживания. Замбия🌿 Но внутренний мир и навыки зеленого бархата здесь очень похожи на Бразилию и Колумбию. Кольцо на бриллиантовой дорожке с таким колумбийцем обошлось бы вам в три раза дороже, чем ценник @buro_mendelevich

❤96

5 Nov 2026, 13:09 UTC≈2,030 views68 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Как я формирую цену на цирконы. Что влияет на ценник, помимо себестоимостей и налогов? Я смотрю на перформанс и коллекционную ценность. Смотрю на средний рыночный ценник впечатления «дорого и красиво» как для любителя (следит за легендарными марками и популярными личными брендами), так и для специалиста, который реально знает рынок. Вот здесь я вижу камни, которые по красоте не уступают природным фантазийным брилл…

❤68

5 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC≈2,310 views115 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Вчера увидела у официантки вопиюще прекрасное кольцо — и хотела бы сказать, что такие истории по цене 7-8 айфонов ювелирное @buro_mendelevich умеет делать: - в Москве - в Лондоне - в Дубае - в Неаполе - в Бангкоке

❤115

4 Nov 2026, 13:26 UTC≈2,650 views144 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В честь сегодняшнего праздника, уходящего корнями в начало XVII века, попросила ИИ восстановить известную паршивого качества фотографию русских височных серег-голубцов того времени. Да, скифы мы. Да, азиаты мы! Хорошего выходного.

❤144

4 Nov 2026, 10:12 UTC≈2,730 views139 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

У нас много роскошных турмалинов! Этот — самый распрекрасный. @buro_mendelevich

❤139

2 Nov 2026, 15:15 UTC≈3,080 views186 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Гениальная моя подруга принесла мой первый турмалин из 2018 года и пару полукаратных кушонов, из которых выросла и сказала, что пора объединить. Очень хочу теперь делать бриллиантовые спутники цветникам только так…

❤186

2 Nov 2026, 14:08 UTC≈3,030 views103 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Стальная шпинель более 2 каратов весом — это очень редкая история. В меру дорого, не в меру редко. Такие камни дают месторождения Танзании и Вьетнама. Здесь 3.5 карата — в моей практике с 2018 года это третья крупная стальная шпинель. Важно понимать: это дневной свет! Вам много базовой серой шпинели покажут под секси-лампой, и там будет сияющая тьма. Но вас должен интересовать только перформанс камня при дневном св…

❤103

2 Nov 2026, 12:49 UTC≈3,060 views78 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Еще про винтажные нежно-строгие часики Cartier поговорить можем. @jeweleditor

❤78

2 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC≈3,130 views112 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Занималась сложным желтым бриллиантом в Дубае, нашла «по дороге» понятный двухкаратник классный. И очень выгодный! Это «удачная небесцветность», конец алфавита системы GIA для бесцветных бриллиантов. Много таких поменьше я пристроила в 2018-2019 году, славное было время. Отличная груша, дешевле уже не будет — бриллиантовый кризис на эти цвета не распространился! Пишите: @jeweleditor

❤112

29 Oct 2026, 13:49 UTC≈4,080 views123 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Вы знаете, что делать! @buro_mendelevich

❤123

28 Oct 2026, 13:51 UTC≈4,250 views85 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Смотрите, как оно горит в зимнем полумраке! На заказ тоже есть отличные варианты: @buro_mendelevich

❤85

28 Oct 2026, 13:50 UTC≈3,780 views75 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Культовое уже в Москве кольцо «Каменный цветок» 16 размера можно стремительно купить всего за три айфона на сайте. Стоит успеть. Мы сейчас такое делаем процентов на 30 дороже. Так что если кто-то давно мечтал о турмалине на демантоидах...

❤75

Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @nanopearl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@nanopearl edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Jewellery Digest
@jeweldigest · 21,440
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
Доктор Щербатова
@JuliaSherbatova · 39,356
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Янковская
@myankovskaya · 19,255
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
shoes&drinks
@shoesanddrinks · 27,076
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
don't touch my face
@donttouchmyface · 54,762
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Наножемчуг” (@nanopearl), 15,253 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nanopearl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.