Posted without readable text
❤🔥54custom 540001977089028614131❤25👍6

Channel
@booksyandex
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
141,135subscribers
-5,976 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001018687017 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @booksyandex |
| Description | Мы любим книги. Поэтому сделали приложение, в котором их действительно удобно читать и слушать. В канале рассказываем о стоящих книгах, аудиокнигах и комиксах. Сайт — books.yandex.ru №4970393904. |
| Created | 20 January 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/booksyandex |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:07 | 141,135 | -19 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:39 | 141,154 | -73 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:38 | 141,227 | -57 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:27 | 141,284 | -39 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:45 | 141,323 | -50 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:37 | 141,373 | -27 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:20 | 141,400 | -37 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:55 | 141,437 | -51 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 141,488 | -53 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:26 | 141,541 | -29 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 141,570 | -54 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:09 | 141,624 | -38 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 141,662 | -1,784 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 143,446 | -31 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 143,477 | -58 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:08 | 143,535 | -84 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:21 | 143,619 | -85 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:39 | 143,704 | -53 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:08 | 143,757 | -48 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:55 | 143,805 | first reading |
108 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 188 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 108 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 201,740 |
| Reactions total | 3,653 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 03:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12,100 reactions across 107 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,667 | 38.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1,771 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5400019770890286141 | 1,492 | 12.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1,331 | 11.0% | |
| 👍 | 808 | 6.68% | |
| 😭 | 422 | 3.49% | |
| 💔 | 336 | 2.78% | |
| 🤣 | 259 | 2.14% | |
| 💅 | 182 | 1.50% | |
| 💘 | 145 | 1.20% | |
| 👻 | 132 | 1.09% | |
| ⚡ | 125 | 1.03% | |
| ✍ | 93 | 0.769% | |
| 🤩 | 91 | 0.752% | |
| 🙏 | 87 | 0.719% | |
| 💯 | 70 | 0.579% | |
| 👏 | 47 | 0.388% | |
| 🆒 | 31 | 0.256% | |
| ☃ | 7 | 0.058% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 0.033% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 107 of the 108 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 108 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @booksyandex. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 108 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (14.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Posted without readable text
❤🔥54custom 540001977089028614131❤25👍6
Российский император годами разыскивает любовные письма сестры. В Вене полиция следит за гостями русской княгини. В Москве дворяне собираются за закрытыми дверями масонской ложи. Эти истории могли бы стать сюжетами «Войны и мира». Но их герои — реальные люди, которым мы посвятили «Кроме Толстого» — новый документальный сериал, оригинальный проект Яндекс Книг. В шести эпизодах расскажем о хозяйках влиятельных салоно…
❤82❤🔥22👍17custom 54000197708902861418🤣1
Обычно сборники читают ради рассказов внутри, но в случае «Новых опасных видений» стоит задержаться и на предисловиях❗️ Их автор, писатель и составитель Харлан Эллисон, хвалит, язвит, спорит и заранее настраивает читателя на встречу с непривычной фантастикой. Под одной обложкой у него оказались Ле Гуин, Брэдбери, Воннегут и десятки других авторов. Разбираемся, как редактору удалось сделать антологию событием и поче…
❤🔥20custom 54000197708902861418👍7❤4
#новинки ноября: изучаем, что нас ждёт в последний месяц осени 🍁 Список разнообразный: новые Липтрот и Кавана, романтика и суровый реализм и много чего другого (кстати, будут и свежие романы Александры Марининой и Виктора Дашкевича). В подборке — книги, которые выйдут у нас в ноябре. Если что-то пока не находится, значит, будет чуть позднее ⏳ В комментариях делитесь, какие книги ждёте вы?
❤🔥52custom 540001977089028614127❤15👍7☃2
Пьём чай, пишем письма, перечитываем классику — такие вот маленькие радости ноября ☕️ Собрали книги с идеями для холодных вечеров, девять — на карточках, а ещё больше — на полке. Кстати, за 500 минут чтения книг из этой подборки в ноябре вы можете получить ещё и награду (их ищите в приложении) 🔴
❤66custom 540001977089028614121❤🔥10👍9☃4⚡3
Новогодние книжки уже можно предлагать? Мы начнём (потихоньку)🎄 В сборнике «Между нами зима» — шесть историй о людях, у которых декабрь выдался не очень-то праздничным. Кто-то ужасно устал от работы, кто-то переживает расставание, кто-то остался без компании на Новый год. Но впереди у каждого — ночь, в которую ещё может случиться что-то хорошее. Читаем, слушаем, развешиваем гирлянды 🎄
❤🔥42❤14😭8custom 54000197708902861416☃1⚡1👍1🤣1
В октябре в книжной рубрике медиа Кинопоиска обсуждали Нобелевку, встречались с призраками и делились рецептами пирогов. Собрали все материалы месяца — выбирайте, с чего начать: • 🎧 5 аудиохорроров для тех, кому мало шорохов за окном • 🥧 пирог агента Купера и ещё четыре рецепта с экрана • почему автор «Дракона» сомневался, что он писатель: вспоминаем Евгения Шварца • чего боится «китайский Хичкок» — интервью с Нин …
👍27❤23custom 54000197708902861413
Свежий #ЛУЧ — скорее читаем 🤍 Напоминаем, что ЛУЧ — это награда для книг, которые начинают читать и дочитывают чаще других. О новых книгах, которые её получают, мы регулярно рассказываем в канале под хештегом #ЛУЧ Сегодня список пополнился на четыре книги: 🔘«Копия Веры», Катя Качур После аварии Вера Петровна застревает между жизнью и смертью. Её сын Павлик — художник-копиист с мистическим даром — отчаянно пытаетс…
❤47⚡10custom 54000197708902861419👍3🤣2❤🔥1💯1🤩1
Наш костюм на Хэллоуин — книга, которую не можешь дочитать третий год 📖 За другими ужасами отправились к Ксении Грициенко, главному редактору оригинальных проектов Яндекс Книг и автору телеграм-канала «Жуткое». На карточках собрали девять пугающих книг по её совету, а на полке оставили ещё больше жуткого чтения. И делитесь своими любимыми хоррорами-триллерами-ужастиками в комментариях 👇
❤61🤩18custom 540001977089028614113👍9💅4
На ночь такое лучше не читать... Но когда нас это останавливало? 👻 Собрали восемь страшных новинок для тех, кому хочется пощекотать нервы. Книги — на карточках, а ещё больше жутких историй — на нашей специальной тыквенной полке 🎃
custom 540001977089028614162❤30❤🔥20👍7✍1👏1
Октябрь подходит к концу, самое время спросить: какую самую осеннюю книгу вы прочитали в этом сезоне? Делитесь в комментариях, что прочли и почему вам понравилось! Соберем осенний топ 🍁
❤58👍12custom 54000197708902861417❤🔥3
Нянь, чупакабра, Исонадэ, баньип, мапингаури... страшно? Если нет, вы просто не знаете, кто это такие. Но это легко исправить! «Жуткая энциклопедия. Самые страшные монстры» Джулианы Ротонди — идеальный источник информации о фантастических существах и чудищах со всего света. Читайте-листайте с детьми и без 🐲 И, конечно, вопрос на засыпку: догадаетесь, что за чудища на картинках? #детское
❤44❤🔥12👻12👍4custom 54000197708902861414👏2💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @booksyandex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@booksyandex edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 55 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Яндекс Книги” (@booksyandex), 141,135 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/booksyandex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.