Posted without readable text
❤41

Channel
@admarginem
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,007subscribers
+4,788 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001061122147 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @admarginem |
| Description | вокруг издательства ad marginem сайт: https://admarginem.ru/ шоурум Ad Marginem Warehouse переведеновский пер. 18с3 пн-вс, 12:00–20:00 по вопросам сотрудничества: @anpisman Регистрация в перечне РКН — https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6791fcd658ab2221b0d1b43f |
| Created | 21 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 51 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/admarginem |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 34,007 | -24 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:50 | 34,031 | -54 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:34 | 34,085 | -32 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 34,117 | -58 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 34,175 | +3,281 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 10:17 | 30,894 | +217 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 30,677 | +120 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:35 | 30,557 | +119 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:45 | 30,438 | +132 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 30,306 | +132 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 07:45 | 30,174 | +201 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 10:29 | 29,973 | +20 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:08 | 29,953 | -102 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 20:00 | 30,055 | -37 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 30,092 | +10 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 22:38 | 30,082 | +232 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 29,850 | +49 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 29,801 | -14 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 29,815 | -11 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 29,826 | first reading |
195 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 134 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 195 (4 August 2026 – 27 October 2026) |
| Views total | 305,810 |
| Reactions total | 4,161 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Oct 2026, 16:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10,515 reactions across 189 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10,515 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 194 of the 195 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,903 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 195 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤41
Кто вы, когда на вас никто не смотрит? В начале XX века этот вопрос перестал быть отвлеченным. Фернандо Пессоа раздал свои стихи десяткам вымышленных поэтов, наделив каждого биографией, характером и собственной манерой письма, и признавался, что сам он теряется среди них. Луиджи Пиранделло в романе «Кто-то, никто, сто тысяч» пошел другим путем. Его герой никого не выдумывает: он обнаруживает, что его и без того сотн…
❤47
Открыли предзаказ на «Нежные пуговицы» Гертруды Стайн — сборник прозаических миниатюр, в котором писательница проблематизирует отношения слов и вещей. Стайн начала писать эту книгу летом 1912 года. Короткие тексты, входящие в сборник, носят самые обыденные заглавия вроде «Графина», «Сельтерской бутылки» или «Куска кофе». Названный предмет внутри текста почти не упоминается: Стайн разворачивает каскад ощущений и ассо…
❤77
Вакансия в Ad Marginem! Ищем в команду издательства PR-менеджера — человека, который будет отвечать за продвижение наших книг и проектов. Что нужно делать: — разрабатывать и реализовывать медиа-план; — продвигать книги и мероприятия издательства; — развивать коммуникацию с партнерами (от медиа и телеграм-каналов до брендов и книжных магазинов); — организовывать презентации книг и другие офлайн-мероприятия; — участво…
❤114
В 1913 году рецензент издательства «Оллендорф» вернул рукопись «В сторону Сванна» с запиской: «Я, может быть, глуп, как пробка, но не понимаю, какой интерес читать тридцать страниц о том, как некий господин ворочается в постели, прежде чем уснуть». Ролан Барт этот интерес понимал и перечитывал роман «В поисках утраченного времени» всю жизнь. Самое откровенное из того, что он думал о Прусте, осталось в его рабочей ка…
❤57
Публикуем расшифровку паблик-тока «Полезен ли Фуко сегодня?», который прошел в Москве в день столетия философа. Сергей Зенкин рассказал, почему в России Фуко понимают хуже, чем могли бы, и почему до сих пор не могут договориться о прилагательном от его фамилии. Виктор Каплун прочитал мини-лекцию о том, как Фуко предлагал смотреть на отношения власти, и о понятии гувернаментальности, которое у нас переводят то как «п…
❤49
Video message, posted without a caption
❤24
Обсуждаем Юнгера на петербургском фестивале «по краям». Бар Mishka — здесь мы до 20:00.
❤38
Video message, posted without a caption
❤47
Петербург, мы стартовали! Ждем сегодня и завтра в баре Mishka
❤40
На фестивале «по краям» в Петербурге пройдет книжная распродажа — и не только наших изданий! Два дня в баре Mishka будут продаваться книги Silene Noctiflora, Издательства Европейского университета и книжного «ДАЛЬ». Чтобы среди стопок было проще сориентироваться, мы собрали в карточках по несколько лотов от каждого участника — от наших осенних новинок до раритетной «Археологии знания», которую «ДАЛЬ» привезет к стол…
❤47
Лес: от окопа к свободе. Презентация книги Эрнста Юнгера «Лесок 125» Летом 1918 года рота лейтенанта Эрнста Юнгера держала позиции у небольшого перелеска на севере Франции. Из окопных записей Юнгер собрал «Лесок 125». Книга выросла из тех же фронтовых дневников, что и «Стальные грозы», но устроена иначе. В ней меньше атак и больше будней войны: ожидания, усталости, страха. Эпизоды выстроены не в хронологическом поря…
❤42
Showing the 12 most recent of 195 posts we hold for @admarginem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@admarginem edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
кого выберете вы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 195 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 69 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 140 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“по краям” (@admarginem), 34,007 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/admarginem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.