Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Общество распространения полезных книг

Channel

Общество распространения полезных книг

@obrpk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,496subscribers

+229 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001038075348
TypeChannel
Username@obrpk
Created4 March 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/obrpk

Growth

26,26726,49626,381.55 August 2026 — 26,267 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,267 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,273 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,276 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,279 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,288 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,290 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,296 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,303 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,298 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,309 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,328 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,338 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,365 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,372 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,379 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,383 subscribers23 August 2026 — 26,391 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,394 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,402 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,416 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,439 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,446 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,453 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,456 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,464 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,469 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,464 subscribers4 September 2026 — 26,472 subscribers8 September 2026 — 26,496 subscribers5 August 20268 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 33 days, net +229. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,233–26,530 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 00:1926,496+24
4 Sept 2026, 23:3826,472+8
3 Sept 2026, 05:5426,464-5
1 Sept 2026, 21:3426,469+5
31 Aug 2026, 23:3826,464+8
30 Aug 2026, 23:4726,456+3
29 Aug 2026, 20:5326,453+7
28 Aug 2026, 21:3426,446+7
27 Aug 2026, 21:1226,439+23
26 Aug 2026, 22:5626,416+14
25 Aug 2026, 21:0926,402+8
24 Aug 2026, 20:5426,394+3
23 Aug 2026, 08:5826,391+8
21 Aug 2026, 20:0726,383+4
20 Aug 2026, 14:0626,379+7
19 Aug 2026, 15:1226,372+7
18 Aug 2026, 17:1826,365+27
17 Aug 2026, 19:2526,338+10
16 Aug 2026, 15:5826,328+19
15 Aug 2026, 01:1726,309first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 26,496 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,220
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held50 (16 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total130,520
Reactions total1,881
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,503 reactions across 48 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,49342.6%
🔥1,36438.9%
64618.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,718 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 50 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @obrpk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 04:54 UTC≈1,370 views37 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ножницы, надеваемые на ружье и пику для разрушения специальных искусственных проволочных препятствий, проволочных изгородей, телеграфных и телефонных проводов Гулькевич, Николай Александрович (1863–). Ножницы, надеваемые на ружье и пику для разрушения специальных искусственных проволочных препятствий, проволочных изгородей, телеграфных и телефонных проводов: Изобретение отст. Гвардии полк. Н. А. Гулькевича: [С прил.

2110🔥6

2 Sept 2026, 04:54 UTC≈2,310 views61 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Перечеркнутое стихотворение Данила Хармса, написанное им в 1935 году и характеризующее разлад в группе «чинарей» и конфликт с Н. Олейниковым. «Сборище друзей, оставленных судьбою»: «Чинари» в текстах, документах и исследованиях : в 2 т. Т. 1: А. Введенский, Л. Липавский, Я. Друскин. — М.: Ладомир, 1998. 1072 с. Стихотворение на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

592

1 Sept 2026, 04:41 UTC≈2,690 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Наши въедливые соседи Нифантов, Геннадий Дмитриевич. Блохи, клопы, вши наши въедливые соседи / Г. Д. Нифантов. — Москва; Ленинград: Гос. изд-во, 1926. — 32 с. : ил.; 20 см. Страница книги на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

2714🔥9

31 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC≈3,840 views62 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Святая лень Ленский, Владимир Яковлевич. Лень-ленище: [Сказка в стихах] / В. Ленский С рис. Б. Покровского. — Ленинград; Москва: Радуга, 1925. — [12] с. : цв. ил.; 27 см. Иллюстрация на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

3316🔥13

30 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC≈3,600 views77 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

— А на что мне пальцы? — ответил мальчик. — Здесь всё делают машины. Сиди да нажимай кнопки — для этого достаточно и одного пальца. Чандар Кришан. Перевернутое дерево [повесть-сказка] / Кришан Чандар; рисунки Е.Галея. — Москва : Детгиз, 1956. — 128 с. Цитата на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

🔥372515

29 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈8,740 views159 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

№ 35б: «Якове брате, еби лежа, ебехото, аесово» Радослав дает указание своему брату Хотеславу: «Возьми у прасола (торговца) 2 гривны и 5 кун». Это указание Хотеславу резко не понравилось; возможно, брат отсылает его к прасолу вместо того, чтобы просто отдать долг (есть аналогии этой ситуации в новгородской грамоте 690). Он ответил язвительно и не стесняясь формой выражения. Обращение — «Якове брате» (а не Радославе)

🔥94587

28 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC≈4,920 views87 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Не прошел еще и год, Как из Тани стал урод. Девочка замарашка : Сказка. — Санкт-Петербург : Рус. скоропеч. Нахимова, 1877. — 10 л. : ил.; 34. Цитата на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

3830🔥19

27 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC≈5,470 views80 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Зрительные галлюцинации при белой горячке Стрельчук, Иван Васильевич. Клиника и лечение наркоманий / Проф. И. В. Стрельчук. — [3-е изд., перераб. и доп.]. — Москва: Медгиз, 1956. — 346 с. : ил.; 23 см. Иллюстрация на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

4220🔥18

26 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC≈5,240 views55 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Неумойка Неумойка: Русская сказка. — Москва: И. Д. Сытин, 1916. — 19 с. : ил.; 21. Скачать книгу на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

29🔥1511

25 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC≈5,740 views76 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Сообщение от северного комитета биокосмистов-имморталистов — Иди от критики! Биокосмисты. Десять штук. 1923. — Петроград : Комитет поэзии биокосмистов-имморталистов (Северная группа), 1923. — 14, [2] с.; 26 см. Скачать книгу на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

🔥382612

24 Aug 2026, 04:47 UTC≈5,060 views71 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Чем масштабнее становились машины, тем дольше и упорнее приходилось работать людям, которые ими управляли. Харрис, Марвин. Каннибалы и короли. Истоки культур / Марвин Харрис ; перевод Н. Проценко. — Москва : Издание книжного магазина «Циолковский», 2024. — 315, [3] с.; 22 см. Цитата на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

3423🔥14

23 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC≈4,680 views41 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Клиника и лечение наркоманий Стрельчук, Иван Васильевич. Клиника и лечение наркоманий / Проф. И. В. Стрельчук. — [3-е изд., перераб. и доп.]. — Москва: Медгиз, 1956. — 346 с. : ил.; 23 см. Скачать книгу на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

🔥329

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @obrpk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мальцовская Галерея
@malzoffsgallery · 30,730
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 6 September 2026
МЕЛОДИЯ
@firmamelodiya · 36,190
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Общество распространения полезных книг” (@obrpk), 26,496 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obrpk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.