Соло на ChatGPT Коллега спросил меня: - Ты пишешь докторскую? - Пишу, - ответил я. - И я пишу, - сказал мой коллега, - махнем не глядя?
😁56❤12

Channel
@USSResearch
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,578subscribers
+471 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001291528302 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @USSResearch |
| Description | РНФ проект № 25-28-00557 Регистрация в РКН https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/6970caaccb7a4637a1a1d83e Если у вас есть вопросы или комментарии можете мне написать @aa_fokin Страница на Boosty - https://boosty.to/ussresearch/donate |
| Created | 17 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/USSResearch |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 12,578 | +10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 12,568 | +5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 12,563 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 12,561 | +18 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:59 | 12,543 | +18 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 12,525 | +9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 12,516 | +18 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 12,498 | +36 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 12,462 | +10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 12,452 | +14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 12,438 | +100 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 12,338 | +183 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 12,155 | +35 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:50 | 12,120 | +13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 12,107 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 12,107 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (26 July 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 229,160 |
| Reactions total | 3,358 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,358 reactions across 34 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 784 | 23.3% | |
| ❤ | 746 | 22.2% | |
| 🔥 | 700 | 20.8% | |
| 😁 | 670 | 20.0% | |
| 👎 | 133 | 3.96% | |
| 😢 | 125 | 3.72% | |
| 😱 | 80 | 2.38% | |
| 🤬 | 57 | 1.70% | |
| 🤯 | 46 | 1.37% | |
| 😭 | 17 | 0.506% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,358reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Соло на ChatGPT Коллега спросил меня: - Ты пишешь докторскую? - Пишу, - ответил я. - И я пишу, - сказал мой коллега, - махнем не глядя?
😁56❤12
19 августа 1991 года начались события, которые спустя всего несколько дней будут называться августовским путчем, а в политический словарь войдёт новая аббревиатура — ГКЧП. Между прочим, в 2026 году исполняется ровно 35 лет этим событиям, но юбилей получился почти незаметным: ни в академической среде, ни тем более в публичной политике я пока не вижу серьёзной попытки заново обсудить, что именно тогда произошло. Была л…
🔥45❤26👍22😢9😁3👎1🤬1
В современной России давно существует устойчивый сюжет о европейских тюрьмах, которые описывают почти как санаторий: там будто бы спокойно живут, получают нормальную еду, сохраняют человеческое достоинство и, находясь под надзором, все равно не превращаются в сломанных людей. В конце 1990-х на этой логике был построен фильм «Хочу в тюрьму», где герой стремился попасть в голландское заключение; уже гораздо позже похож…
😁40🔥22❤11👍11👎2😭1
💬 К августу 1991 года Советский Союз подошел в состоянии, при котором привычные институты трещали. Экономический спад углублялся, связи между республиками разрушались, союзный центр спорил с российским руководством о пределах полномочий, а новый Союзный договор, назначенный к подписанию на 20 августа, сулил республикам значительно большую самостоятельность. Для части союзной номенклатуры это означало ослабление цент…
❤15🔥6🤬1
Есть в истории советско-британских контактов один почти забытый сюжет, который каждый раз кажется слишком странным для учебниковой схемы холодной войны. Одним из самых заметных друзей СССР в Великобритании был не профсоюзный лидер и не фермер из Йоркшира, которого привезли показать счастливые колхозы, а декан Кентерберийского собора Хьюлетт Джонсон. Британская пресса называла его Красным деканом. Чтобы почувствовать…
🔥44❤28👍15😁8🤯4🤬2😢2😭1
Думаю, все смотрели фильм «Бриллиантовая рука» и помнят, что основной сюжет там такой: Геша Козодоев отправляется в заграничный круиз, чтобы «получить перелом» и в гипсе провезти в СССР драгоценности. Потом Шеф найдет их на своем участке, сдаст государству и легально получит 25 процентов от стоимости. Думаю, если бы Шеф просто пришел и предложил ввозить в СССР драгоценности и валюту за 25 процентов, а 75 процентов от…
👍50😱20😁10❤1
После войны между СССР и Великобританией осталось немало следов недавнего союзничества, и некоторые из них оказались куда более личными, чем дипломатические соглашения. Во время войны и сразу после нее 34 британских военнослужащих и сотрудника посольства женились на советских женщинах. После такого брака британский сотрудник должен был вскоре покинуть СССР, тогда как его жена могла уехать лишь с разрешения советских …
😢26🤬23👍12❤11👎1😁1😭1
Перечитываю "Филиал" Довлатова и поражаюсь насколько современная повесть у него получилась в 1987 году. Местами читаешь и думаешь вот заменить несколько фамилий и будет репортаж из наших дней (а иногда даже фамилий менять не надо) Фрагмент 1 На радио я сотрудничаю уже десять лет. В первые же дни начальник Барри Тарасевич объяснил мне: – Я не говорю вам – что писать. Я только скажу вам – чего мы писать категорически …
😁112❤24😱11👍4👎3🔥2😢2🤬1
Вот это хороший пример того, что Марк Харрисон в своей книге «Тайный Левиафан» называет налогом на секретность: советская система вынуждена была тратить деньги на поддержание этого самого режима «совершенно секретно». Сначала нужно было потратить массу материальных и человеческих ресурсов, чтобы сделать очень точные карты, а затем - ещё немало ресурсов, чтобы внести в них правки и сделать непригодными для вероятного …
👍43😁31😢15😭10❤4🤬1
СССР полвека искажал свои же карты. Зачем? 3 сентября 1988 в газете "Известия" вышло интервью с начальником Главного управления геодезии и картографии при Совмине СССР Виктором Ященко. Он признался, что Советский Союз 50 лет искажал топографические карты (популярные среди походников и других туристов), чтобы ввести вражеских агентов в заблуждение. То, что топографические советские карты сделаны плохо намеренно, дл…
❤40😁29👍8👎3🤬1🤯1
Ученики советской школы магии на тренировке по квиддичу Валентин Борисов 1982 год
😁98🔥22😱9❤5🤯1
В ответ на мой пост пошла интересная линия дискуссии, к которой подключились уважаемые Павел Пряников, Дмитрий Прокофьев, Евгений Кузнецов и Александр Замятин, в связи с чем выскажу ещё несколько мыслей. 1. Непосредственно сам марксизм отдавал приоритет экономике, про это писали и классики и уже в советское время. Например, в Третьей программе КПСС было записано, что для построения коммунизма необходимо решить три з…
👍76❤34👎22🔥5🤬3😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @USSResearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 12,613 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“USSResearch” (@USSResearch), 12,578 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USSResearch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.