Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Стальной шлем

Channel

Стальной шлем

@stahlhelm

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,358subscribers

+136 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001132521681
TypeChannel
Username@stahlhelm
Created11 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stahlhelm

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,19720,35820,277.56 August 2026 — 20,222 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,222 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,219 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,208 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,212 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,216 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,213 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,208 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,207 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,204 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,203 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,197 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,204 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,206 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,241 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,292 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,317 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,328 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,329 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,342 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,334 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,338 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,329 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,325 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,326 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,328 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,323 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,314 subscribers5 September 2026 — 20,320 subscribers8 September 2026 — 20,358 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 34 days, net +136. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,173–20,382 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 18:3820,358+38
5 Sept 2026, 10:0020,320+6
3 Sept 2026, 10:4520,314-9
2 Sept 2026, 07:3420,323-5
1 Sept 2026, 08:4920,328+2
31 Aug 2026, 09:3620,326+1
30 Aug 2026, 08:5720,325-4
29 Aug 2026, 11:1420,329-9
28 Aug 2026, 10:2820,338+4
27 Aug 2026, 06:5620,334-8
26 Aug 2026, 04:0720,342+13
25 Aug 2026, 05:2720,329+1
24 Aug 2026, 06:2620,328+11
22 Aug 2026, 16:4920,317+25
21 Aug 2026, 05:2520,292+51
20 Aug 2026, 03:5320,241+35
19 Aug 2026, 04:4720,206+2
18 Aug 2026, 01:5220,204+7
16 Aug 2026, 22:1720,197-6
15 Aug 2026, 19:0320,203first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.5%
avg views ÷ 20,358 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,840
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held22 (7 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total62,710
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
73
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 22 we hold a reading for · 68%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stahlhelm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC≈3,340 views0 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026

​​Нацистская колонизация Польши 1 сентября – очередная годовщина нападения нацистской Германии на Польшу, с которой принято отсчитывать начало Второй мировой войны. Кампания продолжалась чуть больше месяца и завершилась 6 октября оккупацией всей польской территории. Со второй половины XIX в. жители аграрных восточных провинций Пруссии массово переезжали в более индустриализированные западные провинции, а то и вовсе

30 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,990 views0 reactions13 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Chu:i shiro! В третьей беседе «Стального шлема» и «Берсальеров» с преподавателем истории и политологии Арсеном Афунцем мы обсудили самую успешную войну в истории Японской империи – Первую мировую. C минимальными потерями, относительно других сражавшихся государств, Япония смогла отобрать у Германии Циндао, Марианские, Каролинские и Маршалловы острова. В итоге страна окончательно вошла в круг великих держав, определя

28 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈4,170 views0 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026

​​Четвёртая война за независимость Объединение Германии в XIX в. лишь частично можно описать метафорой «завоевание Германии Пруссией». В значительной степени это всё же был договорный процесс, в результате которого империя осталась федерацией автономных региональных монархий и Вольных городов с особыми «резервными» правами. Напротив, Рисорджименто в куда большей степени можно описать как «завоевание Италии Пьемонто

21 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈5,550 views0 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Канал Medieval Zhopa – блог о трудностях жизни в средневековой Европе с уникальным контентом. Каждый пост – личное исследование автора, основанное на редком историческом материале. Никакой копипасты и левых фактов. Канал рассказывает обо всём: рыцари и замки, войны и Крестовые походы, короли и шуты, восстания и пытки, голод и эпидемии, любовь и смерть, а также еда, одежда, профессии, животные, суд, криминал, интриги

18 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈29,000 views0 reactions10 Starsread 3 September 2026

​​На сайте https://pontvs.ru вышел подготовленный мною тест о путях объединения Германии. Хотя реальные перспективы объединить страну в XIX в. были, пожалуй, только у Пруссии и Австрии, я решил разнообразить прохождение и добавил ещё Баварию, Саксонию, Вольные Ганзейские города на северном побережье, а также западногерманские земли, которые могли стать центром объединения в случае успеха либеральной революции 1848 г.

16 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈5,160 views0 reactions13 Starsread 3 September 2026

А что, если бы… Давние читатели канала знают, что я являюсь большим хейтером кондовой фразы, будто «история не терпит сослагательного наклонения». Это клише сводит историю к унылому начётничеству и обоснованию неизбежности случившихся событий, выхолащивая из неё всю жизнь в виде борьбы нереализованных альтернатив. Впрочем, сильно увлекаться альтернативной историей тоже не стоит: исторический процесс – это, конечно,

14 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈6,320 views0 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026

Так ли беззубы системные партии? Оппозицию авторитарным режимам принято делить на «системную» и «несистемную». Подразумевается, что «системная оппозиция» играет «по правилам» и не представляет непосредственной угрозы, тогда как «несистемная» способна принести больше хлопот. Это весьма условная дихотомия. Бывает, что вчерашних «системных» кандидатов (вроде партии «Яблоко») снимают с выборов из-за того, что их якобы п

11 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈6,180 views0 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @politicalsinsPhoto

Мажоритарные -VS- пропорциональные выборы на примере 🇫🇷Третьей Французской республики🇫🇷 Принято считать, что пропорциональные избирательные системы должны заставлять политиков больше говорить о программах, которые выгодны широким группам избиратель:ниц: пенсиях, социальном страховании, защите труда, перераспределении доходов. Почему? Меньше смысла бороться за отдельный округ и больше за голоса всей страны в целом,

10 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈6,310 views0 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

​​Швейцарские львы С XIV по XIX вв. швейцарские наёмники служили во многих европейских армиях, в том числе в качестве личной гвардии монархов. Например, с конца XV столетия швейцарцы охраняли французских королей. В 1616 г. Бурбоны учредили полк Швейцарской гвардии. 10 августа 1792 г. в Париже в рамках очередного витка Французской революции началось восстание революционеров с целью окончательно упразднить конституци

31 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC≈8,040 views0 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026

​​Chu:i shiro! Записали второй разговор «Стального шлема» и «Берсальеров» с Арсеном Афунцем, преподавателем истории и политологии в Университете Мэйдзи (Токио). Наша предыдущая беседа была посвящена Реставрации Мэйдзи, а в этот раз Арсен подробно рассказал о русско-японской войне. В России об этом конфликте принято вспоминать как о поражении, которое стало прелюдией для Первой русской революции. Однако и в Японии,

30 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC≈8,870 viewsread 3 September 2026

​​Последнее фото Бисмарка Отто фон Бисмарк являлся премьер-министром Пруссии с 1862 г. и канцлером Германской империи с 1871 г. В 1890 г. новый кайзер Вильгельм II отправил его в отставку. Бисмарк не простил императора и, как часто бывает, стал интриговать против своих преемников. На момент отставки канцлеру уже было 75 лет. С возрастом он всё больше хирел, запустил гангрену на ноге и вечером 30 июля 1898 г. умер в

28 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC≈6,910 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

С 2010 г. 28 июля (или 15 июля по юлианскому календарю) отмечается в России как памятная дата – День крещения Руси. С 2008 г. эта дата также отмечается на Украине, хотя в 2023 г. она была перенесена на 15 июля по новоюлианскому календарю, который совпадает с григорианским. Впервые День крещения Руси был с большой помпой отпразднован в 1888 г., когда отмечался 900-летний юбилей этого события. Главными энтузиастами го

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @stahlhelm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@stahlhelm edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTCAnonymous Poll1,660 voters approx.

Посмотрим, какую аудиторию я собрал на этом канале. На чьей стороне ваши симпатии в испанской Гражданской войне?

  1. Республиканцы41%
  2. Националисты31%
  3. Нейтралитет28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 36 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Василий Тополев
@vasil_topolev · 44,443
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Redroom Text
@redroomtext · 75,794
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Гусь Василий под тополем
@gus_vasili · 37,837
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Первый ближневосточный | Иран 🇮🇷 | Ливан 🇱🇧
@kief_point · 52,902
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Григорий Баженов
@furydrops · 28,379
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
Книжный импорт
@importknig · 35,296
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Стальной шлем” (@stahlhelm), 20,358 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stahlhelm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.