Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Аппельберг

Channel

Аппельберг

@minarety

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,208subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001099457411
TypeChannel
Username@minarety
Created5 January 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/minarety

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,2088,2478,227.55 August 2026 — 8,228 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,228 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,239 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,240 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,245 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,247 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,242 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,239 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,231 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,225 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,208 subscribers5 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,202–8,253 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 14:008,208-17
1 Sept 2026, 15:138,225-6
30 Aug 2026, 01:168,231-8
23 Aug 2026, 23:048,239-3
20 Aug 2026, 02:488,242-5
16 Aug 2026, 17:228,247+2
12 Aug 2026, 17:248,245+5
9 Aug 2026, 19:588,240+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:178,239+11
6 Aug 2026, 03:038,228no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:008,228first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.4%
avg views ÷ 8,208 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,250
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held32 (28 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total22,470
Reactions total411
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,073 reactions across 31 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
97547.0%
👍80738.9%
🤔1024.92%
😢1004.82%
💔894.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,073 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC770 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня утром в эфире ВОТ ТАК: против кого «дружит новый альянс» Саудовская Аравия — Пакистан — Турция и что это говорит о влиянии США в регионе? ▶️ Мой комментарий по ссылке (с 1:25:36) *Тексты в этот канал тоже вернутся, а также готовлю кое-то новое (для себя), так что не переключайтесь

👍87🤔1

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

20 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC≈2,300 views36 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Дональд Трамп объявил об очередных — САМЫХ СОКРУШИТЕЛЬНЫХ (sic!) — санкциях против Ирана. Правда, кажется, он и сам не уверен, что они сработают. У Ирана же есть рычаги контрдавления: всё тот же Ормуз, удары по энергетической инфраструктуре стран Персидского залива — всё это повышает цены на нефть и вместе с тем стоимость войны для Трампа. Экономическая война на истощение. ▶️Мой комментарий Deutsche Welle по ссылке

👍2113🤔2

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

19 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈2,060 views76 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @wanderingtymur

Тем временем уже 11-й день идёт осада палестинских домов ультраправыми поселенцами в деревня Кусра на Западном берегу. События развивались по отработанной уже схеме, из-за которой тысячи палестинцев на Западном берегу были изгнаны израильтянами из своих домов. Поселенцы заблокировали дома семей Абу Рида и Хассан в районе Рас-эль-Айн (на окраине Кусры) в воскресенье, 9 августа. Они установили палатки и самодельные ко

😢52👍148🤔2

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

18 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC≈1,920 views24 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @demoversia_ilPhoto

«Гораскопус» в Музее АНУ: презентация книги и разговор о женщинах в эмиграции 20 августа в Музее АНУ пройдет презентация нового романа Вики Ройтман «Гораскопус» и Public Talk о женщинах в эмиграции. «Гораскопус» — история Зои из Одессы, которая репатриируется в Израиль, поступает в университет и заново собирает свою идентичность в новой стране. Вика расскажет, как создавался роман и почему литература помогает осмыс

14👍7🤔3

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

18 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC≈1,750 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Разные приятные женщины собираются, чтобы поговорить о своём опыте эмиграции. И, как будто этого мало, это ещё и презентация книги! ⬇️

15

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

13 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈2,780 views71 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Поселенческое насилие на Западном берегу достигло такого уровня, что даже посол США в Израиле Майк Хаккаби (который в целом поддерживает поселенческий проект) назвал осаду поселенцами домов палестинских семей «террором». (Ну и про Ормузский пролив) ▶️ Мой комментарий Deutsche Welle — по ссылке (с 00:19:30)

👍38😢196💔6🤔2

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

13 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC≈2,590 views58 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @wanderingtymur

Составил небольшую памятку по основным участникам предстоящих выборах, так как пока что не увидел нигде внятного краткого описания на русском. Выборы в Кнессет 26-го созыва состоятся 27 октября 2026 года. Главными вопросами этой кампании станут отношение к премьеру Биньямину Нетаньяху и формирование широкой коалиции (как и в 2021-2022). Снова столкнулись два рака: Рак Биби и Рак лё Биби. Правый лагерь и религиозные

👍439🤔3😢3

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

11 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC≈2,530 views39 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

По приглашению «Исраэль Шелану» завтра поучаствую в стриме Дмитрия Дубова. Что сейчас происходит с Ближним Востоком? Как война с Ираном изменила региональный баланс? Какие новые союзы зарождаются на наших глазах, кто усиливает свое влияние, а кто его теряет, и какое место в новой региональной системе занимает Израиль? 🗓️12 августа в 21:00 Зарегистрироваться для участия в стриме и задать свой вопрос можно по ссылке

23👍16

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

11 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC≈2,550 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Дональд Трамп разочаровался в идее силового давления на Иран – по крайней мере, пока. Переговоры, по его собственным словам, тоже идут вполсилы. Поэтому теперь ставка на экономическое давление. По крайней мере, до промежуточных выборов в ноябре. А там все счета обнуляются. ▶️ Мой вчерашний комментарий 9 каналу по ссылке (с 02:23:00)

👍2013

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

10 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈3,220 views43 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Свежезаключённый оборонный пакт Саудовской Аравии, Пакистана и Турции немедленно столкнулся с первым вызовом: хуситы нанесли удар по саудовскому нефтеперерабатывающему заводу. Хотя, согласно заявлению МИД Пакистана, атака на одну из трёх стран будет расцениваться как атака на все три, реакции пока не последовало. Видимо, смотря что считать атакой. Допустим, на удары иранских прокси альянс готов закрывать глаза (Сауд

17👍17🤔9

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

7 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTCviews —

Аппельберг pinned «Я подала в суд на Эзру Мора. В конце прошлого года израильский блогер Максим (Эзра) Мор на своем канале с десятками тысяч подписчиков опубликовал уничижительный сексуализированный пост обо мне (ссылка на веб-архив). Пост включает изображение логотипа моего…»

7 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC≈4,160 views39 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Интервью Deutsche Welle — про Иран и Трампа; про Израиль и Газу, и про Ормузский пролив. ▶️ Мой комментарий — по ссылке (с 00:10:30).

👍2316

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @minarety. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTCAnonymous Poll540 voters

Поиграем в Polymarket?

  1. СА нормализует отношения с Израилем12%
  2. СА не нормализует отношения с Израилем, сделка сорвётся15%
  3. СА не нормализует отношения с Израилем, но сделка состоится44%
  4. СА нормализует отношения с Израилем, но только после поражения Нетаниягу на выборах29%
  5. Конгресс взбунтуется не одобрит сделку11%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Первый ближневосточный | Иран 🇮🇷 | Ливан 🇱🇧
@kief_point · 52,932
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Восточный Синдром
@vostochnysyndrome · 83,945
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Пелливерт | Израиль | Политика
@pellivert · 41,725
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
Дмитрий Дубов
@dubovd · 38,760
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Обзиратель. Война на Ближнем Востоке ⚔️
@obzirate1 · 37,791
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аппельберг” (@minarety), 8,208 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minarety.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.