Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шангъянг

Channel

Шангъянг

@shanggyangg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,885subscribers

+100 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001534153793
TypeChannel
Username@shanggyangg
Created26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shanggyangg

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,7744,8854,829.56 August 2026 — 4,785 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,785 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,782 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,780 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,779 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,780 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,774 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,801 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,824 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,847 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,843 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,868 subscribers13 September 2026 — 4,870 subscribers17 September 2026 — 4,885 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,757–4,902 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:574,885+15
13 Sept 2026, 10:024,870+2
9 Sept 2026, 04:194,868+25
3 Sept 2026, 20:014,843-4
31 Aug 2026, 01:374,847+23
28 Aug 2026, 04:344,824+23
25 Aug 2026, 00:344,801+27
21 Aug 2026, 07:284,774-6
18 Aug 2026, 06:124,780+1
15 Aug 2026, 15:584,779-1
12 Aug 2026, 02:444,780-2
9 Aug 2026, 08:114,782-3
6 Aug 2026, 03:514,785no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:354,785first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 31 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,089 reactions across 25 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁86341.3%
🤡40719.5%
👍25912.4%
🕊1889.00%
❤1517.23%
🔥462.20%
🐳432.06%
🎉251.20%
😱251.20%
👏180.862%
🤩120.574%
💅100.479%
👎90.431%
🥰90.431%
🤓80.383%
😢50.239%
🫡50.239%
🙏20.096%
🤯20.096%
🤔10.048%
1 further kind10.048%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,573 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC990 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Написал для международной аудитории про чудеса советского этносостроения, замечательного якуто-гвинейского петербуржца и силу социально-экономических факторов. Until yesterday, I didn’t know there was a single Bissau-Guinean-Yakutian person in the world, and now I know there is at least two, and one of them just outran 5 000 white people. If this isn’t amusing, I don’t know what is. https://shanggyangg.substack.com…

😁16🕊11🤡3👍2❤1

10 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC≈1,520 views149 reactionsread 12 August 2026

О, накрутили клоунов, забавно (было ноль, когда в последний раз открывал, при количестве остальных реакций примерно как сейчас; и вдруг из ниоткуда отгрузили сразу 230)

😁109🤡24🕊7🐳4❤2👎1🤔1🤬1

10 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC≈2,030 views523 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ВНЕЗАПНАЯ волна энтузиазма вокруг партии «Яблоко», которая закончилась их снятием с выборов — как и ВНЕЗАПНЫЕ очереди за Надеждина, которые закончились его нерегистрацией — как и ВНЕЗАПНАЯ кампания по надуванию Даванкова, которая закончилась беспрецедентным уполовиниванием его реального результата фальсификациями — это всё история об одном и том же: в России существует огромный запас нереализованной политической эне…

🤡262🕊168🔥34😁20❤16👍16👎3👏2

9 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈2,150 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Блин, этому челу 38 лет. То есть он под сорокет годиков занимает первые места на марафонах. Вот она, сила социально-экономических факторов.

😁64❤8🥰4👏2

9 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC≈2,420 views128 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Human biodiversity Как известно, 97 из 100 лучших в мире бегунов на длинные дистанции родились в Африке, а в любой стране с заметным чернокожим населением они почти всегда доминируют среди бегунов. Это связано исключительно с социально-экономическими причинами. Но что если африканцев в стране почти нет? Например, вашими чемпионами становятся такие люди как Артур Бурцев — человек на фотографии и победитель сегодняшн…

😁110❤12🫡5🤩1

8 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC≈2,000 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Нет, я всё понимаю, но как возможно, заведя разговор о западничестве, пропустить славянофилов — то есть как раз концепцию, в которой Россия не неприкаянная часть чего-то иного, а сама себе целое? Каким лешим, Крылов, возможно придумать, что цивилизационную самодостаточность России выдумал Вадим Цымбурский? Что?

😁8🤓1

8 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC≈16,400 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вчера собрался писать пост о том, что Джастас Уолкер, пытающийся спасти свою семью от депортации, — скрепа, объединившая абсолютно всю Россию: нет вообще никого в стране, кто не сочувствовал бы алтайскому весёлому молочнику. Сегодня оказалось, что я неправ. Нашлись на Святой Руси люди, готовые напрыгнуть на белого консервативного христианского фермера — Егор Холмогоров и Роман Антоновский! Конечно, говорят, не надо…

😁57😱18🐳14😢5🤡3🕊2❤1

7 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈2,320 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хороший пример — Венгрия при Орбане (которая, конечно, не была диктатурой, но имела явные авторитерные тенденции): раз за разом раздробленная оппозиция дарила Орбану победу, и снесла его только полноценная консолидация вокруг Мадьяра — при том, что куча оппозиционных избирателей имели очень мало общего с идеологией Мадьяра. Российская «Тиса» могла бы быть либеральной, социал-демократической, фашистской, популистской…

👍42🤡5😱3❤2

7 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC≈2,130 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сложно не смотреть на дискурс, развернувшийся вокруг выборов в Госдуму («голосуем за яблоко!!!» — «нет, за нл!!!» — «нет, за кпрф!!!»), как на аргумент в пользу мажоритарной двухпартийной системы по американскому образцу. Двухпартийку обычно ругают по принципу «не за кого голосовать, всего две партии и обе говно». Особенно популярно среди радикалов слева («обе партии за бурзуазию») и справа («обе партии за сионистов…

👍56🤡20🐳3👎2😁2👏1😱1

7 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈3,600 views137 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новые чудеса российского парламентаризма: сегодня я узнал, что у Партии пенсионеров, как и у других партий, есть молодёжное крыло. Оно называется «молодёжное движение ВНУКИ». Думаю, на этом споры о выборах, в принципе, можно заканчивать.

😁124🎉13

6 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC≈1,660 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @witte_nachtenPhoto

Разговор по душам в шведском ультраправом лагере. Этнический иранец и известный правый блоггер Ник Алиния, родившийся и выросший в северной Швеции, берет интервью у лидера партии «Альтернатива для Швеции», известной своей программой по ремиграции, Густава Кассельстранда. Алиния: Насколько низко в списке по ремиграции находится Ник Алиния? Кассельстранд (смеется): Ну, ты знаешь, что ты есть в нем. Ты родился в Швец…

😁69🐳13❤7💅3👎1

6 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC≈1,870 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Дорогие петербуржцы! Говорят, вся Москва уже сходила в местную «Листву» на презентацию их новой книги по самообороне. А мы, питерские, отстаём. Друзья, стыдно. Нам что, самооборона нужна меньше, чем москвичам? Какой город, в конце концов, назвали Расчленинградом? Всех призываю срочно записаться на презентацию книжки в фантомную питерскую «Листву» и доказать москвичам, что именно наш город на первом месте по необход…

🤡24😁12👍7😱3❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @shanggyangg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTCAnonymous Poll802 voters

Подписчики, сезон выборов наступает. Вы знали, что этот опрос будет. За кого вы собираетесь голосовать на выборах в ГД РФ?

  1. 🐻 Единая Россия4%
  2. 🧴 Новые люди27%
  3. 🟥 КПРФ5%
  4. 🟦 ЛДПР3%
  5. 🟨 Справедливая Россия0%
  6. 🍎 Яблоко37%
  7. Другая партия1%
  8. Испорчу бюллетень1%
  9. Имею право голосовать, но не буду15%
  10. Не имею права голосовать (нет 18 / не гражданин РФ)6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Василий Тополев
@vasil_topolev · 44,432
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Роман Юнеман
@big3russia · 26,966
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
Гусь Василий под тополем
@gus_vasili · 38,045
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Григорий Баженов
@furydrops · 28,365
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
Пробковый шлем
@pithhelmet · 23,201
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД
@whalesgohigh · 61,668
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
CONWAY
@conway671games · 44,747
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
Михаил Светов (Комитет по Этике)
@mrlibertarian · 30,033
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шангъянг” (@shanggyangg), 4,885 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shanggyangg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.