Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 37 days, net +244. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,025–8,343 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 14:36
8,306
+64
7 Sept 2026, 05:57
8,242
+27
2 Sept 2026, 09:42
8,215
+8
30 Aug 2026, 15:29
8,207
+24
27 Aug 2026, 13:48
8,183
+29
24 Aug 2026, 10:28
8,154
+19
21 Aug 2026, 02:03
8,135
+40
17 Aug 2026, 18:54
8,095
+6
15 Aug 2026, 02:14
8,089
-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:05
8,090
+19
8 Aug 2026, 21:51
8,071
+9
6 Aug 2026, 03:04
8,062
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:39
8,062
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
45.1%
avg views ÷ 8,306 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,740
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
36 (6 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
41,190
Reactions total
1,484
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
4,926 reactions across 35 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,129
43.2%
🤬
585
11.9%
👍
420
8.53%
🔥
417
8.47%
🕊
406
8.24%
😁
246
4.99%
🙏
164
3.33%
😢
130
2.64%
🤡
124
2.52%
👏
77
1.56%
🫡
70
1.42%
💔
44
0.893%
🤔
28
0.568%
👎
26
0.528%
😱
22
0.447%
🤯
18
0.365%
🤩
15
0.305%
🎉
3
0.061%
🥰
2
0.041%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,983 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 36 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ob_community. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Живые дебаты между партиями в Москве! Приходите!
Совсем скоро в России пройдут выборы в Государственную Думу, и поэтому в российском обществе всё острее встаёт вопрос: за кого голосовать в сентябре?
13 сентября Общество.Будущее проведёт в Москве открытые дебаты между представителями парламентских партий России. Дебаты будут представлять собой структурированную дискуссию с ведущим-модератором. Тема дебатов звучит пр…
Поддержите сбор на гуманитарную помощь мирным жителям Крыма — осталось совсем немного!
О тяжёлой ситуации жителей Крыма многие знают не понаслышке: частые атаки ВСУ важнейших трасс, отключения электричества вплоть до полного обесточивания полуострова и, конечно, острый дефицит топлива. Эти проблемы делают жизнь обычных крымчан невероятно сложной или даже невыносимой.
Именно поэтому в середине августа открылся сбор …
Маленькая архитектурная победа
С хорошими новостями, особенно по теме сохранения культурного наследия, мы к вам приходим нечасто, но сегодня именно такой день. Станции московского метро, которые ранее были лишены причитающегося им охранного статуса, вновь его обрели!
Напомним, недавно более 30 станций московского метрополитена были лишены статуса выявленных памятников культуры регионального значения по абсолютно не…
Осторожно: патентные тролли!
От драконовских норм законов об авторских правах страдают далеко не только кандидаты на нынешних выборах. Уже давно что у нас, что в остальном мире орудуют «патентные тролли». В девяностые и двухтысячные в России они, например, массово скупали за копейки права на песни артистов СССР, сейчас же их излюбленная тактика приобретать права на фотографии. Метод их заработка: прочёсывать интерне…
Внезапно, негаданно, сенсационно! Савва Федосеев в Екатеринбурге и готов рассказать про великий и могучий русский геймдев!
Русский геймдев — велик и беспощаден. Мурашки уже побежали? Что вспомнили? Корсары? Мор.Утопия? Или Дальнобойщики? Эх…
Игры, к тому же, прекрасный инструмент для тонкой пропаганды идей, идеологий и смыслов на уровне кино, а может и значительнее.
На примере разрабатывающейся игры «Осовец 1915» …
Николай Бондаренко задержан
Предвыборная зачистка продолжается — на этот раз отстранить готовятся кандидата от КПРФ Николая Бондаренко. Сегодня стало известно о его задержании по обвинению в «демонстрации экстремистской символики».
Эта статья уже стала стандартной для сколь-либо неудобных для власти кандидатов. В прошлом году по ней был задержан снабженец фронта и наш соратник Савва Федосеев, в его случае за экстре…
Предвыборные дебаты между парламентскими партиями от Общества.Будущее
Друзья, все следят за выборами в Государственную думу, несмотря на «подмороженность» российской политики. Мы последовательно выступаем за то, что голосовать — надо.
Но за кого?
Мы решили сделать то, чего уже давно не видело русское гражданское общество — живые политические дебаты между партиями!
13 сентября в Москве мы дадим представителям всех…
Лучше поздно, чем никогда
Мы тут заметили, что плакат Артемия Лебедева ко Дню России (12 июня) подозрительно напоминает картинку нашего дизайнера от 16 марта.
Совпадение? Возможно. Но раз уж в последнее время в нашей стране к соблюдению интеллектуальных прав относятся особо трепетно, мы рекомендуем быть осторожнее с заимствованиями.
Артемий, мы не злимся. Но в следующий раз указывайте авторство — так и безопаснее,…
Дело «Яблока» подошло к концу
Сегодня Апелляционная коллегия Верховного Суда вынесла решение по делу о снятии с выборов списка партии «Яблоко». Ничего неожиданного — решение о снятии утверждено и вступает в силу незамедлительно. Это значит, что думская кампания по спискам для «Яблока» завершена.
Мы уже рассказывали об абсурдных деталях решения — и сегодня тоже не обошлось без них. Напомним, одним из оснований для с…
Возьмут ли в Думу без лицензии Microsoft?
Новые вести с предвыборных полей. Михаила Матвеева, кандидата в Госдуму от КПРФ, сняли с предстоящих выборов. Поводом стал иск его соперницы по тому же одномандатному округу, выдвинутой, по иронии судьбы, Партией пенсионеров.
Что известно о товарище Матвееве?
Он действующий депутат Госдумы, пожелавший переизбраться в Думу нового созыва. В отличие от большинства коллег, Мат…
16 августа в Петербурге говорим о дореформенной орфографии
В это воскресенье приглашаем всех на лекцию-семинар нашего сторонника и главы издательства «Шиповникъ» Святослава Рубинина о классической орфографии русского языка. Обсудим как историю реформы языка, так и место классической орфографии сегодня.
Издательство «Шиповникъ» занимается печатью исключительно в дореформенном стиле — у Святослава есть богатый опыт, …
Насильно мил не будешь
Премьеру «Колобка» в России ждали с большим трепетом. В ожидании триумфа владельцы кинотеатров даже перенесли нового «Человека-паука» — наверное, чтобы спасти его кассовые сборы, не иначе.
Ажиотаж не стихал и после премьеры кинокартины по детской сказке: сеть заполонили ролики и посты, где одни критикуют графику и сюжет фильма, другие иронизируют над полными залами нераспроданных билетов, а т…
❤127👏35👍24🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @ob_community. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ob_community named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@nepleno named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 21 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Роман Юнеман @big3russia · 26,895 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
Обыкновенный царизм @ordinaryczarizm · 43,484 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Под лед @podled · 34,614 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Общество.Будущее” (@ob_community), 8,306 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ob_community.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.