Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
28,400 average views per post against 38,134 subscribers — an engagement rate of 74.4%. Across the 8,315 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,997 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.08% and 20.8%, with a median of 10.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
41 of 41 published in the window (0 exact, 41 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,163,630
Mature posts only
75.8% over 40 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 93 days, net +2,265. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,523–38,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 23:46
38,130
+10
5 Nov 2026, 22:27
38,120
-14
4 Nov 2026, 20:31
38,134
+11
3 Nov 2026, 21:25
38,123
+18
2 Nov 2026, 18:40
38,105
-2
1 Nov 2026, 18:38
38,107
-10
31 Oct 2026, 21:07
38,117
+9
30 Oct 2026, 22:45
38,108
+4
30 Oct 2026, 00:20
38,104
-4
28 Oct 2026, 22:48
38,108
-5
27 Oct 2026, 03:50
38,113
-10
26 Oct 2026, 01:27
38,123
-21
25 Oct 2026, 02:50
38,144
+5
23 Oct 2026, 23:36
38,139
+5
22 Oct 2026, 22:45
38,134
-4
21 Oct 2026, 23:07
38,138
-2
19 Oct 2026, 14:31
38,140
-4
18 Oct 2026, 10:55
38,144
+6
17 Oct 2026, 07:56
38,138
-5
16 Oct 2026, 11:26
38,143
first reading
Engagement
256 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 191 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
73.8%
avg views ÷ 38,130 subscribers
Avg views / post
28,100
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 256 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
256 (31 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
1,209,400
Reactions total
29,877
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 20:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,980
Videos
≈362
Links
≈1,080
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9m 26s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
189,282 reactions across 255 posts, in 58 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
76,178
40.2%
🤣
34,038
18.0%
❤
17,848
9.43%
😭
11,109
5.87%
👍
7,496
3.96%
💯
5,049
2.67%
👻
3,985
2.11%
😈
3,676
1.94%
😢
3,150
1.66%
👏
2,597
1.37%
❤🔥
2,319
1.23%
🦄
2,057
1.09%
🥰
1,706
0.901%
😎
1,665
0.88%
🤔
1,346
0.711%
🙈
1,163
0.614%
🔥
1,047
0.553%
😱
1,036
0.547%
🤯
1,036
0.547%
🗿
1,000
0.528%
38 further kinds
9,781
5.17%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 256 of the 256 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189,677 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 256 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
152
across the posts below
Posts paid on
52
of 256 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gus_vasili. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 256 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 43 posts held from the last 30 days (20.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Тут есть одна проблема
Вот биография предыдущего демократического спикера Сената (сейчас - лидер меньшинства в Сенате).
Schumer attended Brooklyn public schools, scoring 1600 on the SAT and graduating as the valedictorian of James Madison High School in 1967. He competed for Madison High on the television quiz show It's Academic. He attended Harvard College, where he originally majored in chemistry before switching…
Для тех, кто пишет о скором и неминуемом крахе американской экономики после сегодняшнего стремительного падения наждачных бумаг, и для тех, кто считает, что акции - ничего не значащие фантики, а фондовый рынок - просто казино: две статейки из вики, просвещайтесь
Чёрный понедельник
Чёрный вторник
(в первом случае за гигантским падением биржи не последовало вообще ничего, во втором - Великая депрессия. Во втором слу…
Импортозамещение не перестаёт удивлять. Попадается уже не первый ролик, в котором рассказывают, что в новой Volga K50 на многих деталях маркировка заклеена скотчем или изолентой, чтобы скрыть истинную страну производства — Китай.
Не так давно автомобиль презентовали президенту Путину, где шли разговоры о «возрождении бренда». Хорошее «возрождение», ничего не скажешь. А скотч-то хоть отечественный? Или...
➡️ Подписа…
🇷🇺🇺🇸 СДЕЛКА ПО ПОСТАВКАМ РОССИЙСКОГО ДИЗЕЛЯ В США ОКАЗАЛАСЬ ПОД УГРОЗОЙ СРЫВА: ДВА ИЗ ТРЁХ ТАНКЕРОВ ИЗМЕНИЛИ МАРШРУТ — FT
Один направился в Средиземное море, другой — в Бразилию. Американские покупатели опасаются санкционных и юридических последствий, а губернатор Нью-Джерси призвала местные порты отказаться от приёма российского топлива.
👉 FTT - подписаться
Дональд Трамп: Не понимаю, чем мы вообще занимаемся. Эти тупые, тупые президенты. А ведь мы могли бы победить. Я мог бы выиграть ту войну за три недели. Мог бы выиграть войну во Вьетнаме за одну неделю.
Знаете, они сбрасывали, черт знает что это было, какая-то красная дрянь. Они постоянно сыпали её в джунгли. "Агент Оранж" - хотя цвет у него красный, но всё же «Агент Оранж». Они годами, десятилетиями поливали им лес…
Showing the 12 most recent of 256 posts we hold for @gus_vasili. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@gus_vasili edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 34 posts on @gus_vasili as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
34 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
10
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что означает «эффект храповика» в описании трансмиссионного механизма на странице 103?
Прерывания логистических цепочек ускоряют рост издержек производства28%
Цены менее склонны снижаться, чем расти30%
Храп снижает производительность труда, что в условиях опережающего роста зарплат ускоряет инфляцию14%
Хррр что?28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 256 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 73 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@gus_vasili named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sputniklive named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ @svtvnews · 112,450#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Стальной шлем @stahlhelm · 20,648 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
Тупа кволити контент @skazochnoebalie · 22,750 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 September 2026
Василий Тополев @vasil_topolev · 44,525 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД @whalesgohigh · 61,516 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Михаил Светов (Комитет по Этике) @mrlibertarian · 29,876 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
Redroom Text @redroomtext · 75,861 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Первый ближневосточный | Иран 🇮🇷 | Ливан 🇱🇧 | Йемен 🇾🇪 @kief_point · 53,062 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Пробковый шлем @pithhelmet · 23,218 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
Позже всех. Ну прости @latenewz · 59,693 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
Секира Лектора @lecturerhistory · 24,388 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
CONWAY @conway671games · 47,470 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
КАШИН @kashinguru · 75,113 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ @svtvnews · 112,450 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
Леонардо Ди Ванче @skvir · 20,883 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026
Григорий Баженов @furydrops · 28,201 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
Abstract memes | Amdevs @am_devs · 30,544 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 7 September 2026
историк-алкоголик @istrkalkglk · 123,388 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Норин @norinea · 40,689 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
кьют-монархизм 🇱🇻 | музыкальный критик, историк никита фризов @hyperpopmonarchism · 23,707 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 17 September 2026
Дисперсия Каргинизма / Ближний Восток @karginizm · 38,104 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
Virginia Bēowulf | английский язык @v_beowulf · 40,594 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Евгений Понасенков @evgenii_ponasenkov · 78,663 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Neural Meduza @neuralmeduza · 20,374 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 September 2026
СЛАВА БОГУ У НАС ЕСТЬ МЕМЫ @SBUNEM · 25,778 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 77 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гусь Василий под тополем” (@gus_vasili), 38,130 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gus_vasili.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
