Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Друг Народа /// 𝕂𝕠𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕕𝕠𝕣

Channel

Друг Народа /// 𝕂𝕠𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕕𝕠𝕣

@dryg_naroda

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11,467subscribers

-45 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001173253238
TypeChannel
Username@dryg_naroda
Created27 May 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dryg_naroda

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,46711,55411,510.55 August 2026 — 11,512 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,512 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,508 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,507 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,502 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,500 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,503 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,538 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,546 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,547 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,546 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,541 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,549 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,547 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,551 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,554 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,553 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,550 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,551 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,547 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,543 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,541 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,539 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,535 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,533 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,532 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,517 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,498 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,492 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,482 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,477 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,467 subscribers5 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 44 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,454–11,567 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:2111,467-10
16 Sept 2026, 23:5611,477-5
15 Sept 2026, 00:5811,482-10
13 Sept 2026, 13:4011,492-6
11 Sept 2026, 19:5511,498-19
9 Sept 2026, 09:5711,517-15
6 Sept 2026, 05:4011,532-1
2 Sept 2026, 11:4411,533-2
1 Sept 2026, 14:5411,535-4
31 Aug 2026, 13:1311,539-2
30 Aug 2026, 11:5411,541-2
29 Aug 2026, 15:1611,543-4
28 Aug 2026, 14:0711,547-4
27 Aug 2026, 14:1311,551+1
26 Aug 2026, 15:3311,550-3
25 Aug 2026, 12:4911,553-1
24 Aug 2026, 13:0811,554+3
22 Aug 2026, 22:3711,551+4
21 Aug 2026, 15:5611,547-2
20 Aug 2026, 15:0711,549first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.6%
avg views ÷ 11,467 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,880
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held40 (7 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total24,410
Reactions total450
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 05s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,716 reactions across 39 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,69462.4%
👍93534.4%
👎873.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,716 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 21:25 UTC≈3,750 views72 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Уверен, что белорусским оппозиционерам время от времени приходит такое видео от неизвестного аккаунта.

😁72

29 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈7,730 views82 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Вручить полковнику Пузику право распоряжаться имуществом вверенной солдатни — это эбсолютли гениальная идея.

😁74👎8

26 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC≈4,680 views146 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Мало кто знает, но особым отделом армии Дмитрия Донского заведовал молодой и тогда ещё никому не известный подполковник КГБ…

😁143👍3

26 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC≈4,330 views99 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Я все ждал, когда скажут что под началом Мамая была дивизия СС Мертвая Голова.

😁98👍1

26 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC≈3,920 views51 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @gus_vasiliVideo

Video, posted without a caption

😁47👎3👍1

22 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC≈5,210 views118 reactionsread 2 September 2026

35 лет «Лебединому озеру» Мои представления о том, что началось в 1989-ом и закончилось в 93-ем — или всё-таки в 96-ом, — лишь недавно приобрели более-менее стройные очертания. Я лично знал нескольких непосредственных участников событий. Трое были на стороне ГКЧП, один из них — Язов. Один — на стороне Ельцина, и именно он от жизни выиграл больше всех. Про его борьбу за демократию я слушал в замке на Лазурном берегу

👍115👎3

21 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC≈4,360 views84 reactionsread 2 September 2026

«Геннадий Андреевич, ёб твою мать, это какая-то унылая постная залупа. Тридцать лет говоришь эту хуету. Давай лучше дискредитируй себя, старый козёл.» — сказал расстроенный голос по телефону.

😁81👍2👎1

21 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈4,290 views78 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @progrevg1

Отрыжки ельцинской эпохи нападают на народного кандидата Николая Бондаренко. Владимир Владимирович говорит о честных выборах, но что делают власти в Саратове? Вместо формирования правительства народного доверия и развития народных предприятий они оказывают давление. Посмотрите как работает Казанков в Марий Эл, посмотрите как Грудинин сделал народное предприятие в Подмосковье. Люди устали от либерального экономическог

😁66👍11👎1

20 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC≈3,210 views78 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @AlexCarrier

Случился дипломатический анекдот. Гдет неделю назад я вам показывал представителя МИДа Марию Захарову, которая полтора часа рассказывала нам про западных лицемерных пидорасов и про то, как мы их своей правдой™ победим. Можно тут посмотреть: https://t.me/AlexCarrier/16578 С ней в эфире сидели Чадаев, Уралов и ещё ктото. И полтора часа слушали, как Захарова всех победит. Это было 6 августа, я пост написал 10 августа.

😁73👍5

19 Aug 2026, 21:20 UTC≈3,790 views53 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Тут комментировать только портить. Криэйтором, Вава, криэйтором. https://t.me/bankrollo/64917

😁53

19 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈5,160 views40 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @spichka_mediaPhoto

«Царь — хороший, бояре — плохие!» Шесть аргументов, которые уничтожат миф Ты снова это видел. Жители российского города на коленях перед камерой просят президента восстановить справедливость. Плач, гнев, недопонимание. В комментариях — репосты и молитвы: дай бог, чтобы заметил! Но царь не замечает. Вместо этого раз за разом подписывает антинародные законы, о шести из которых мы напомним в статье. Читай, как власти

👍24😁14👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @dryg_naroda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jul 2026, 20:37 UTCAnonymous Poll1,410 voters approx.

А где вы живете?

  1. Россия80%
  2. Украина2%
  3. Беларусь2%
  4. Казахстан1%
  5. Европа6%
  6. Штаты1%
  7. Другое7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Друг Народа /// 𝕂𝕠𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕕𝕠𝕣” (@dryg_naroda), 11,467 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dryg_naroda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.