Григорий Баженов - к.э.н., научный сотрудник ЭФ МГУ, препод ВШЭ. Веду блог об экономике.
Макро, экон. история, экономика стран
Сотрудничество: @Oneggin @ads_alina @bajenof
РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67afd0aa6411ff7853910712
Реклама ≠ рекомендация.
Created
27 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
15 measurements spanning 16 days, net -80. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,502–28,606 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 10:53
28,514
-18
20 Aug 2026, 22:34
28,532
-11
19 Aug 2026, 23:03
28,543
+3
18 Aug 2026, 23:54
28,540
-3
17 Aug 2026, 21:03
28,543
-12
16 Aug 2026, 17:48
28,555
-2
15 Aug 2026, 02:37
28,557
-3
13 Aug 2026, 16:17
28,560
-12
12 Aug 2026, 15:24
28,572
-6
11 Aug 2026, 16:08
28,578
+3
10 Aug 2026, 15:21
28,575
-9
9 Aug 2026, 16:05
28,584
-2
8 Aug 2026, 14:31
28,586
-4
6 Aug 2026, 18:44
28,590
-4
6 Aug 2026, 02:45
28,594
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.2%
avg views ÷ 28,514 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,040
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.989%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held
23 (7 July 2026 – 21 August 2026)
Views total
48,230
Reactions total
477
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,260
Videos
≈137
Links
≈1,780
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 30m
Average length
30m 02s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,244 reactions across 23 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
916
40.8%
❤
426
19.0%
custom 5224708023435404637
263
11.7%
🔥
259
11.5%
👍
123
5.48%
👎
75
3.34%
🍾
54
2.41%
✍
53
2.36%
💯
17
0.758%
🤔
16
0.713%
🤷♂
14
0.624%
👏
8
0.357%
😎
8
0.357%
🫡
7
0.312%
custom 5386776488341160794
2
0.089%
🥰
2
0.089%
🤩
1
0.045%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,244reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Беги, Трамп, беги
Шутки в сторону: технологический диктат, закат демократии, кризис духа, мировая война, угасание цивилизации уже наступили. Кто берет на себя смелость описывать происходящее в своих работах?
TuRist — концептуальный художник, который создает визуальные манифесты нашего времени и заставляет зрителя задуматься о происходящем вокруг. Его искусство — это попытка удержать мир от самоуничтожения. Гротескн…
Экономист Григорий Баженов в 36 лет не смог сдержать слёз, когда посмотрел это видео.
Удачи тебе, Лёша! Это была большая история, полная эмоций, самоотдачи и совершенно чуждой современному футболу искренности. И я знаю, что она продолжится еще ярче! Вся Россия будет болеть за тебя в Лиге чемпионов, а твой путь в искусстве игры в футбол только начинается!
❤️💚
https://t.me/fclokomotiv/39121
P.S. Скоро и мой камбэк,…
Драгоценные и редкоземельные металлы: от добычи и аффинажа до резервов центробанков и электроники — интервью с Михаилом Дягилевым
▶️В новом выпуске «Промкаста» мы говорим с Михаилом Дягилевым, генеральным директором «Красцветмета», одного из немногих предприятий в мире, обладающих полным технологическим стеком на все восемь известных драгоценных металлов: золото, серебро и шесть металлов платиновой группы, из минера…
▶️Облачный рынок России: ЦОДы, кибербезопасность и кризис железа — интервью с Сергеем Зинкевичем
В новом выпуске «Промкаста» говорим с Сергеем Зинкевичем, CEO K2 Cloud, о трендах российского рынка облачных технологий, новых вызовах для провайдеров и будущем инфраструктурных сервисов.
Обсуждаем, почему облака растут даже в охлаждающейся экономике, «кризис железа» — как за полгода серверы подорожали втрое и вдруг ста…
#заметки
об экономике
Рост цен в июне ускорился. Из чего сейчас складывается инфляция? Получится ли вернуться к ее снижению?
Как всегда — начинаем с фактов. В июне общий индекс потребительских цен (ИПЦ) вырос на 0,87% м/м, а его годовой рост ускорился до 6,0%. Если не брать в расчет скачок цен при повышении НДС в январе этого года, более значительный месячный рост ИПЦ последний раз был в ноябре-декабре 2024 г.
Пре…
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🎙🎙🎙 Аузан предложил способ помирить «слонов» и «китов» в российском обществе.
В течение последних 300 лет в России идет борьба коллективистов и индивидуалистов — «китов» и «слонов» из повести Льва Кассиля, но это противостояние возможно завершить с помощью нового общественного договора, рассказал декан экономического факультета МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова в восьмой лекции из серии «Послезавтра с Александром Аузаном» на …
😁71custom 522470802343540463722❤10🔥2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @furydrops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 30,498 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Proeconomics @proeconomics · 68,398 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
Простая экономика @prostoecon · 294,022 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Redroom Text @redroomtext · 75,835 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Больше, чем экономика @economylive · 637,964 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД @whalesgohigh · 61,751 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Александр Штефанов @alexandrshtefanov · 178,072 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Хулиномика @hoolinomics · 97,739 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
RationalAnswer | Павел Комаровский @RationalAnswer · 105,436 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 August 2026
Фининди | Александр Елисеев @Finindie · 73,085 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ @svtvnews · 113,467 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
Дизраптор @disruptors_official · 71,491 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Григорий Баженов” (@furydrops), 28,514 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/furydrops.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.