Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Твердые цифры

Channel

Твердые цифры

@xtxixty

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,140subscribers

+58 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001392080814
TypeChannel
Username@xtxixty
Created2 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xtxixty

Growth

20,07520,14020,107.56 August 2026 — 20,082 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,082 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,084 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,085 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,081 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,079 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,075 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,086 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,097 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,098 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,104 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,103 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,106 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,110 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,113 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,109 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,107 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,101 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,102 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,096 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,093 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,092 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,089 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,091 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,087 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,084 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,119 subscribers4 September 2026 — 20,122 subscribers6 September 2026 — 20,140 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 31 days, net +58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,065–20,150 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 13:4220,140+18
4 Sept 2026, 06:5420,122+3
2 Sept 2026, 21:3720,119+35
1 Sept 2026, 17:3520,084-3
31 Aug 2026, 20:2420,087-4
30 Aug 2026, 22:1820,091+2
29 Aug 2026, 22:5720,089-3
28 Aug 2026, 20:2420,092-1
27 Aug 2026, 18:1820,093-3
26 Aug 2026, 19:2420,096-6
24 Aug 2026, 17:0620,102+1
22 Aug 2026, 21:5620,101-6
21 Aug 2026, 14:1820,107-2
20 Aug 2026, 12:4220,109-4
19 Aug 2026, 11:1520,113+3
18 Aug 2026, 11:1320,110+4
17 Aug 2026, 10:5520,106+3
15 Aug 2026, 20:1420,103-1
14 Aug 2026, 13:3520,104+6
13 Aug 2026, 03:5420,098first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 20,140 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,910
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.533%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held48 (29 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total104,759
Reactions total558
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

741 reactions across 47 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍38752.2%
9512.8%
🔥8110.9%
🌭466.21%
😱354.72%
🤔293.91%
💯253.37%
182.43%
🤓182.43%
👌70.945%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 750 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:37 UTC979 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

❔Какой вклад в динамику выпуска базовых секторов вносят добыча и нефтепереработка? 👆Ответ на графиках* * Выделяем добычу полезных ископаемых и производство нефтепродуктов и кокса @xtxixty

👍4

2 Sept 2026, 17:34 UTC≈1,220 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Финансовые результаты: в июне ниже • По итогам 1п26 накопленный с начала года сальдированный финансовый результат компаний* составил 11.7 трлн руб. (-13.3% г/г) • В июне финансовый результат составил лишь 399 млрд руб. – примерно в пять раз ниже, чем годом ранее • С поправкой на сезонность ухудшились результаты в торговле, в обработке и в финансах и страховании 💡В среднем в последние месяцы отношение финансовых р

👍5

2 Sept 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,150 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Рынок труда: и всё же он охлаждается • Динамика зарплат в июне продолжила сближаться с динамикой производительности труда – зарплаты выросли на 3.4% г/г в реальном выражении и 9.6% г/г в номинальном выражении • С поправкой на сезонность, по нашим расчетам, зарплаты в реальном выражении продолжили снижаться • Безработица (2.3% по итогам июля) в последние месяца с поправкой на сезонность плавно растет – становится б

👍51🤔1

2 Sept 2026, 17:07 UTC≈1,070 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔍Бонус: розничная торговля под лупой 💡К декомпозиции розничной торговли следует относиться аккуратно – Росстат публикует оперативные детальные данные менее чем для половины структуры всего розничного товарооборота • Данные о динамике розничных продаж бензина Росстат не раскрывает @xtxixty

👍2🤔1

2 Sept 2026, 16:30 UTC≈1,300 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Экономическая активность в уровнях 👆На графиках – выпуск основных секторов в реальном выражении с поправкой на сезонный и календарный факторы 💡По нашим расчетам, сезонно скорректированная динамика выпуска базовых секторов в июле была околонулевой второй месяц подряд • Потребительский спрос в июле был слабее, чем в июне, строительству удалось вернуться к трендовым уровням после заморозки начала года, а в грузооборо

👍41🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC≈2,480 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

❔Как выглядят сценарии макропрогноза ЦБ? 👆Ответ из Основных направлений денежно-кредитной политики в таблицах ⏰Пресс-конференция – в 15.00 @xtxixty

6👍64🤓1

31 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC≈2,380 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

❔Что еще происходит с региональными рынками труда? • Принципиальных изменений в части безработицы (как открытой, так и скрытой) по итогам 2к26 не случилось • Подтверждает постепенное охлаждение рынка труда динамика зарплат 👆Графики и карты о региональных рынках труда, а также подробности об индексе рассогласованности – в документе @xtxixty

👍12

31 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC≈2,140 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

❔Что с региональной согласованностью рынка труда? 💡Она на минимуме более чем за 10 лет • По нашим оценкам, текущие значения индекса* региональной рассогласованности рынка труда соответствуют тому, что почти 30% свободной рабочей силы (безработных) находится не в тех регионах, где на нее предъявляется спрос • Последний раз на сопоставимых уровнях этот показатель был в 2010 г. • В 2017–19 гг. он в среднем составлял

👍7🤔63🔥2

31 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC≈2,150 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Макро – week ahead 🗓Чего ждать на этой неделе? • ЦБ в понедельник представит первый проект Основных направлений денежно-кредитной политики – пресс-конференция запланирована на 15.00 • Также регулятор в течение недели опубликует ряд аналитических материалов перед неделей тишины – календаря публикаций на сентябрь пока нет • Росстат в среду (19.00) выпустит доклад о социально-экономическом положении, а также данные

👍531

26 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC≈3,490 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

О промпроизводстве в июле 💡Выпуск в промпроизводстве остается ниже трендовых уровней, но динамика улучшилась – падение выпуска в добыче и нефтепереработке приостановилось • По нашим оценкам, промпроизводство по итогам июля прибавило 0.2% м/м с.к.* • Сезонно скорректированная динамика в добыче была околонулевой, а обработка выросла на 0.4% м/м с.к. * с.к. = с поправкой на сезонный и календарный факторы @xtxixty

👍10😱5🌭4🤔2

26 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈3,610 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Росстат: ИПЦ с 18 по 24 августа вырос на 0.01% н/н * за исключением 2022 г. @xtxixty

13👍6🌭3

24 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC≈3,510 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Макро – week ahead 🗓Чего ждать на этой неделе? • Росстат в среду (19.00) отчитается о промпроизводстве за июль и даст оценку ИПЦ с 18 по 24 августа (ждем от +0.01% до +0.07%) • ЦБ представит комментарии: i) о развитии банковского сектора (понедельник) и денежных агрегатах за июль (вторник) – динамика кредита и денежной массы уже известна ii) об инфляционных ожиданиях (вторник) – значения инфляционных ожиданий на

👍71

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @xtxixty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЕБИТДА
@ebitdaebitda · 33,359
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 4 September 2026
MMI
@russianmacro · 102,920
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
ВТБ Моя Аналитика
@omyinvestments · 210,072
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
Банк России
@centralbank_russia · 244,206
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
Cbonds
@cbonds · 34,849
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Бла-бла-номика
@blablanomika · 45,928
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
Invest Heroes
@InvestHeroes · 40,175
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
ВТБ Мои Инвестиции
@brokervtb · 109,268
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Alfa Wealth
@alfawealth · 56,132
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Газпромбанк Инвестиции
@gpb_investments · 45,474
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Frank Media
@frank_media · 31,803
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
Экспертосфера
@expertosphere · 29,666
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 8 September 2026
MOEX - Московская биржа
@MoscowExchangeOfficial · 54,807
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 August 2026
Минфин России
@minfin · 49,183
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Market Power
@marketpowercomics · 31,609
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
PRObonds | Иволга Капитал
@probonds · 30,191
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Твердые цифры” (@xtxixty), 20,140 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xtxixty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.