Читатели периодически спрашивают в личке, о чем пишу в приватном канале "Еще больше Думок". Давно о нем не упоминал здесь, поэтому отвечу подробно. В основном канале пишу об интересных событиях на рынках и о трендах в общих чертах, как вижу дальнейшее развитие событий. А в приватном канале почти каждый день конкретно разбираю динамику российского рынка и основных акций, которые торгуются на нем. Почти в обязательно…

Channel
ФИНАНСОВЫЕ ДУМКИ
@MarketDumki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
52,273subscribers
+507 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001138179385 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MarketDumki |
| Description | Авторский канал о мировой экономике, об инвестициях и трейдинге РКН - https://clck.ru/3KR8pk обратная связь @Fdumki [email protected] @privatedum_bot - подписка в приватный канал Только по вопросам приватного канала @MoreDumki_admin |
| Created | 29 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MarketDumki |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:08 | 52,273 | -7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:18 | 52,280 | -6 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:16 | 52,286 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:14 | 52,295 | -8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:49 | 52,303 | -2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:01 | 52,305 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:00 | 52,311 | -11 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:56 | 52,322 | +13 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 52,309 | +9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:21 | 52,300 | -16 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:41 | 52,316 | +33 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:04 | 52,283 | +19 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 52,264 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:36 | 52,272 | +2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 52,270 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:58 | 52,272 | +11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:20 | 52,261 | +8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 52,253 | +14 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:28 | 52,239 | -18 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:01 | 52,257 | first reading |
Engagement
196 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 192 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.8%
- avg views ÷ 52,273 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 13,500
- 67 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.442%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 67
- of 196 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 58 of 67 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 196 (23 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 903,190 |
| Reactions total | 3,456 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 04:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,100
- Videos
- ≈15
- Links
- ≈3,590
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 43s
- Average length
- 33s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,456 reactions across 33 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 843 | 24.4% | |
| 🍾 | 796 | 23.0% | |
| 🔥 | 710 | 20.5% | |
| ❤ | 699 | 20.2% | |
| 😁 | 186 | 5.38% | |
| 😱 | 84 | 2.43% | |
| 👏 | 54 | 1.56% | |
| 🤮 | 27 | 0.781% | |
| 💩 | 26 | 0.752% | |
| 👎 | 18 | 0.521% | |
| 🖕 | 13 | 0.376% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 150 of the 196 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,456 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 196 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 620
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 144
- of 196 we hold a reading for · 73%
- Most on one post
- 100
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MarketDumki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 196 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.55%
- 5 of 196 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 5
- posts carrying an erid · 5 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 14,500
- over 5 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 14,900
- over 191 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnje4C2NX | 1 | 12 October 2026 | 12 October 2026 |
| 2Vtzqv72TGp | 1 | 17 September 2026 | 17 September 2026 |
| 2VtzqvigXDn | 1 | 15 September 2026 | 15 September 2026 |
| 2Vtzqw13moz | 1 | 18 September 2026 | 18 September 2026 |
| 2VtzqwV2s6K | 1 | 4 September 2026 | 4 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 196 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 67 posts held from the last 30 days (1.49%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Южнокорейский индекс Кospi в пятницу снизился еще на 6% и ушел ниже летних минимумов, когда финансовые власти вынуждены были проводить экстренное совещание по стабилизации рынка. Тогда по данным Goldman Sachs около 1.2 млн человек (3.4% взрослого населения Южной Кореи) получили маржин колл! Похожая ситуация сейчас происходит и в Японии, где индекс Nikkei 225 от своего недавнего пика уже съехал вниз на 20%. Там тоже…
👍70🔥18😱18😁7
А помните посты в таком духе? Думали, что такой рост доходностей по Трежерис бесследно пройдет? А вот и нет. 7 октября написал следующее по этому поводу - Чувствую себя в моменте как Галилей, который до последнего утверждал, что Земля вертится вокруг Солнца. В моем случае я по-прежнему придерживаюсь того, что рост доходностей по Трежерис в какой-то момент приведет к резкому обвалу всех рисковых активов в мире (акц…
🔥69👍43😱6
Как вам такие процентные изменения по американским индексам за день? Nasdaq100 - минус 6.4%, а SP500 - минус 4.4% за одну торговую сессию! "Черный понедельник" на минималках. @marketdumki
🔥79👍21😱10😁5
Минус 8.5% сегодня по акциям NVIDIA. Получается, что сгорело в огне около 400 млрд $ капитализации. C вашего позволения процитирую самого себя от 15 октября - Так вот болезненно сдувается ИИшный пузырь в Южной Корее. Интересно, как этот процесс будет происходить в США? Ведь, если акции условной Nvidia потеряют в цене 50%, то это сгорит почти 2.6 трлн $ (при текущей капитализации компании около 5.2 трлн $). А ведь …
👍95🔥43😁19😱5👎3
А вот Илон Маск успел "ошкурить" инвесторов со своим IPO SpaceX еще в июне в отличие от Anthropic и OpenAI. Но теперь Илона хотят "ошкурить" демократы, которые взяли контроль над конгрессом. Такой вот круговорот "ошкуривания" в природе)) @marketdumki
😁133👍24🔥11😱4👎1
Anthropic и OpenAI по ходу дела не успели побрить хомяков на IPO Выскокотехнологичный индекс Nasaq100 падает сегодня колом на 4%. ИИшный бум как будто бы подошел к концу и в США. В Южной Корее это произошло еще летом. @marketdumki
😱37🔥28👍18😁9👎1
Рейтинговое агентство Fitch внепланово понизило прогноз по рейтингу Франции со "стабильного" до "негативного" из-за стремительно ухудшающегося состояния государственных финансов страны. Это произошло после того, как это же самое агентство Fitch во время планового пересмотра рейтинга Франции в августе оставило прогноз стабильным. И вот ситуация за эти два месяца настолько ухудшилась, что Fitch принял решение внеплан…
👍147🔥30😁13😱4👎2
Posted without readable text
Помните еще пост про ресерч от BlackRock от 13 октября? BlackRock задаунгрейдил американские акции до нейтрального уровня и считает, что надо покупать Трежерис для снижения рисков. SP500 тогда был около 7800 пунктов, а доходности по 10-летним Трежерис - 5.25%. А сейчас вы сами видите, что творится на рынке акций. Ну а доходность по 10 -леткам уже снизилась до 4.92% (=рост цены). Сечете фишку? 😉 @marketdumki
👍4
Пошла вода горячая на американском рынке... @marketdumki
Похоже, что американские Техи начали косплеить Коспи (Kospi). @marketdumki
Showing the 12 most recent of 196 posts we hold for @MarketDumki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@MarketDumki edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 27 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 27 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @MarketDumki as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 16 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 2 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 3 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@FatCat18 · 95,4431 postКот Эльвиры
@KotElviry · 48,0541 postSamara Investment Park | Инвестиции | Самара
@Samara_InvestPark · 1021 postНовый Век
@Wek_ru · 18,9331 postAkim’s channel
@akim_aliev · 141 post«АНТИКРИЗИС »
@anticrisisopora · 3771 postДивиденды Forever
@divForever · 76,5161 postПищаДляУма
@nashpeople · 721 postТуранчокс, Вуглускр и биомасса
@oldmosk · 711 postФонды Бонды Лондон
@ultra_trading · 6511 postЁБИ_news
@yobi_news · 171 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 22 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@markettwits · 340,8577 postsНовый Век
@Wek_ru · 18,9336 postsКот Эльвиры
@KotElviry · 48,0545 postsMoney & Digital Assets
@money2 · 26,3874 postsBusiness | Crypto | Finance
@business1 · 25,7393 postsAngry Bonds
@angrybonds · 24,2562 postsБКС Экспресс
@bcs_express · 56,0862 postsДоктор Z прописал
@docpro · 140,7472 postsRocketUP — продвижение telegram каналов!
@RocketUP · 3272 postsAkim’s channel
@akim_aliev · 141 post«АНТИКРИЗИС »
@anticrisisopora · 3771 postКоммодити Феникс
@commodityphoenix · 321 postДивиденды Forever
@divForever · 76,5161 postЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 664,7061 postFinReposter
@finreposter · 131 postНОВОСТИ RU
@finsunduk · 41 postInvest Chats | Каналы по инвестициям и трейдингу | Чаты по трейдингу
@investing_chats · 681 postТуранчокс, Вуглускр и биомасса
@oldmosk · 711 postБлокнот
@parchment · 21 postПолитджойстик / Politjoystic ™
@politjoystic · 250,5531 postTradeInWest
@TradeInWest_ru · 1571 postФонды Бонды Лондон
@ultra_trading · 6511 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@markettwits · 340,857#1
@russianmacro · 102,047#2
@bitkogan · 257,445#3
@headlines_for_traders · 114,676#4
@finpizdec · 54,383#5
@cbrstocks · 117,254#6
@spydell_finance · 131,106#7
@bitkogan_hotline · 82,832#8
@AK47pfl · 114,509#9
@inflation_shock · 39,764#10
@truecon · 26,627#11
@bankrollo · 461,750#12
@angrybonds · 24,256#13
@smartlabnews · 76,490#14
@martynovtim · 36,609#15
@sgcapital · 19,120#16
@ProfitGate · 78,377#17
@moi_misli_vslukh · 13,060#18
@ecworld · 64,575#19
@moexwolf · 26,109#20
@BIoomberg · 72,931#21
@dohod · 70,293#22
@newssmartlab · 64,538#23
@thefinansist · 17,667#24
@proeconomics · 68,731#25
@crimsondigest · 141,038#26
@c0ldness · 13,904#27
@tb_invest_official · 521,825#28
@crypto_hd · 131,750#29
@headlines_MACRO · 19,479#30
@PirogovLive · 27,564#31
@usertrader3 · 13,503#32
@kuzmlab · 23,487#33
@truevalue · 14,058#34
@MarketHeart · 5,479#35
@groks · 42,500#36
@centralbank_russia · 244,091#37
@if_market_news · 119,514#38
@warwisdom · 10,732#39
@MarketOverview · 46,372#40
@profitanet · 201,475#41
@rentierru · 6,315#42
@marketsnapshot · 66,901#43
@multievan · 850,874#44
@finamalert · 74,900#45
@selfinvestor · 126,999#46
@Finindie · 73,270#47
@pro_bonds · 7,328#48
@toxicopinion · 1,909#49
@Bablopobezhdaetzlo · 16,064#50
@mozgovikresearch · 23,532#51
@taurenin · 50,952#52
@InvestHeroes · 39,765#53
@headlines_quants · 17,140#54
@cbonds · 34,839#55
@banksta · 439,713#56
@bbbreaking · 1,975,837#57
@ejdailyru · 664,706#58
@yurasumy · 2,664,351#59
@mash · 3,142,084#60
@auantonov · 321,779#61
@asupersharij · 1,735,583#62
@goodtraders · 44,834#63
@rezident_ua · 963,750#64
@thewallstreetpro · 46,560#65
@zerada1 · 423,393#66
@alfawealth · 55,551#67
@onfleek419 · 37,122#68
@mr_mozart · 127,319#69
@rbc_news · 914,343#70
@legitimniy · 1,051,855#71
@ecworldnews · 27,723#72
@finfak · 15,587#73
@Defiscamcheck · 48,150#74
@thebell_io · 105,109#75
@true_flipper · 17,583#76
@mig41 · 477,158#77
@olegderipaska · 116,058#78
@hoolinomics · 98,634#79
@medvedev_telegram · 1,689,376#80
@headlines_geo · 19,917#81
@russicaru · 418,322#82
@politpe · 1,373#83
@profit1 · 190,273#84
@TotSamyiKogan · 54,074#85
@shuohuaxia · 143,417#86
@obrazbuduschego2 · 163,926#87
@forbesrussia · 235,517#88
@alenka_capital_comon · 15,124#89
@vysokygovorit · 485,341#90
@buratinovsmm · 3,792#91
@bazabazon · 1,557,606#92
@boris_rozhin · 751,554#93
@infantmilitario · 276,046#94
@bomber_fighter · 525,601#95
@dimsmirnov175 · 331,207#96
@politjoystic · 250,553#97
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@sgcapital · 19,120
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 October 2026
@monstertraders · 18,806
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 3 October 2026
@headlines_MACRO · 19,479
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 September 2026
@truecon · 26,627
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
@spydell_finance · 131,106
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@inflation_shock · 39,764
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
@VlULevchenko · 22,015
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
@ecworld · 64,575
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
@angrybonds · 24,256
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
@aabeta · 27,458
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
@Stock_News100 · 18,719
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
@blablanomika · 46,655
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
@russianmacro · 102,047
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
@dohod · 70,293
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
@profitking · 67,631
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
@ProfitGate · 78,377
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
@marketsnapshot · 66,901
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
@bitkogan_hotline · 82,832
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
@markettwits · 340,857
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
@martynovtim · 36,609
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
@smfanton · 51,658
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
@finpizdec · 54,383
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
@bitkogan · 257,445
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
@Ta_ftt · 28,064
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 105 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ФИНАНСОВЫЕ ДУМКИ” (@MarketDumki), 52,273 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MarketDumki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.