Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 16 days, net -237. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70,423–70,732 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 21:38
70,459
-30
20 Aug 2026, 20:28
70,489
-7
19 Aug 2026, 21:03
70,496
-18
18 Aug 2026, 18:52
70,514
-7
17 Aug 2026, 22:25
70,521
-16
16 Aug 2026, 19:05
70,537
-7
15 Aug 2026, 08:36
70,544
-32
14 Aug 2026, 02:36
70,576
-25
12 Aug 2026, 20:13
70,601
-17
11 Aug 2026, 19:33
70,618
-15
9 Aug 2026, 23:34
70,633
-20
8 Aug 2026, 22:06
70,653
-12
7 Aug 2026, 20:49
70,665
-21
6 Aug 2026, 17:33
70,686
-10
6 Aug 2026, 01:35
70,696
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:07
70,696
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 70,459 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,620
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.551%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
39 (21 July 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
298,340
Reactions total
1,643
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,730
Videos
≈144
Links
≈5,920
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,812 reactions across 36 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
753
41.6%
😁
340
18.8%
🔥
270
14.9%
❤
261
14.4%
😢
66
3.64%
👏
45
2.48%
👌
33
1.82%
👎
29
1.60%
🎉
11
0.607%
🤩
4
0.221%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,955reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Два маленьких мальчика, Джек и Том, сидели в парке и разговаривали.
— Какой работой занимается твой папа? — спросил Джек.
— Мой папа — учитель, — ответил Том. — Чем занимается твой папа?
— Он биржевой брокер, — сказал Джек.
— Честный? — спросил Том.
— Нет, просто обычный! — ответил Джек, пожав плечами.
#доходъюмор
💰 Банк Санкт-Петербург – дивиденды
Совет директоров Банка Санкт-Петербург рекомендовал выплату дивидендов за 1 полугодие 2026 г. в размере 19,17 руб. на обыкновенную акцию и 0,22 руб. на привилегированную акцию. Дата закрытия реестра 5 октября 2026 г.
▪️ Доходность
Дивидендная доходность обыкновенных акций по текущим ценам: 7,7%.
Дивидендная доходность привилегированных акций по текущим ценам: 0,6%.
Ожидаемая д…
Ожидаемые дивидендные доходности и индекс стабильности дивидендов (DSI) акций российских компаний
Данные на основе нашего сервиса ДОХОДЪ Дивиденды.
Ожидания не всегда реализуются, поэтому диверсификация, как обычно, должна быть обязательным атрибутом формирования портфеля. DSI позволяет измерить степень уверенности в дальнейших выплатах. Он определяет, насколько регулярно компания выплачивает дивиденды и повышает и…
🔵 Россети Московский регион, Россети Центр и Россети Центр и Приволжье
===Обзор позиций в активных фондах УК ДОХОДЪ
В секторе электроэнергетики несмотря на стремительный рост котировок в 2025 году мы продолжаем удерживать крепкие дочки электросетевого холдинга – Россети Московский регион, Россети Центр и Россети Центр и Приволжье. Это стабильные компании из коммунального сектора с высокой ожидаемой дивидендной дох…
💰 Инарктика (РусАква) - дивиденды
Совет директоров Инарктики рекомендовал выплату дивидендов за 1 полугодие 2026 г. в размере 10 рублей на акцию. Дата закрытия реестра – 4 октября 2026 г.
▪️ Доходность
Доходность выплаты к текущим ценам: 3,1%
Ожидаемая доходность в следующие 12 мес.: 15,3%
▪️ Дивидендная политика
В дивидендной политике Инарктики не прописывают долю от прибыли по МСФО, направляемую на выплаты. …
🔵 ММК
===Обзор позиций в активных фондах УК ДОХОДЪ
ММК, как и весь сектор проходит через циклический кризис, однако, крепкий баланс внушает уверенность в завтрашнем дне (компания имеет запасы кэша, а не долга). Потенциально, мы считаем, что именно текущий момент наиболее интересен для покупки циклической бумаги. Хотя и соглашаемся, что угадать дно цикла очень сложно.
В данный момент компания приостановила выплату…
Bond SHOW: Инвестиции в облигации - эксперт vs ИИ
Спикер: Всеволод Лобов, Директор по инвестициям УК "ДОХОДЪ"
Выступление на конференции Смартлаба в Санкт-Петербурге про то, как конкретно работают модели ИИ при анализе облигаций и каково будущее такого анализа.
https://youtu.be/rRm09HPbSvE
💰 Хэдхантер - дивиденды
Совет директоров Хэдхантер рекомендовал выплату дивидендов за 1 полугодие 2026 года в размере 200 рублей на акцию. Дата закрытия реестра - 28 сентября 2026 г.
▪️ Доходность
Доходность выплаты к текущим ценам: 6,99%.
Ожидаемая доходность в следующие 12 мес.: 12,23%
▪️ Дивидендная политика
Дивидендная политика Хэдхантер подразумевает выплаты дивидендов не реже одного раза в год исходя из …
🟡 Сургутнефтегаз ап
===Обзор позиций в активных фондах УК ДОХОДЪ
Покупка префов Сургутнефтегаза – это в первую очередь ставка на девальвацию рубля. Компания обладает внушительной денежной позицией (сейчас это около 5,5 трлн руб.). Состав «кубышки» сейчас неизвестен. Можно предположить, что какая-то часть переведена в юани и рубли. Ослабление рубля приводит к росту прибыли и дивидендов за счет переоценки валютной «…
🟢 Башнефть ап
===Обзор позиций в активных фондах УК ДОХОДЪ
Скачок цен на нефть и нефтепродукты после начала конфликта в Иране привел к кратному росту маржинальности переработки нефти. Если еще добавить рост выплат по топливному демпферу можно ожидать отличные финансовые результаты Башнефти за 2026 год (дивиденды на уровне 150-170 руб.). Долг компания закрыла.
К минусам компании можно отнести плохой уровень корпор…
👍20❤8👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @dohod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какое решение по ключевой ставке будет принято на заседании Совета директоров Банка России 24 июля?
Повышение (>14,25%)7%
Без изменений (14,25%)54%
-25бп (14.0%)28%
-50бп (13,75%)2%
Снижение более -50бп (<13,75%)2%
Хочу посмотреть ответы8%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 174,313 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Фининди | Александр Елисеев @Finindie · 73,085 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
Лимон на чай @lemonfortea · 245,270 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Дивиденды Forever @divForever · 77,616 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
СМАРТЛАБ @smartlabnews · 76,325 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Invest Era @usamarke1 · 61,128 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
ВТБ Мои Инвестиции @brokervtb · 106,223 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Финам Торговые сигналы @finamalert · 75,453 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
IF Bonds — Облигации РФ @if_bonds · 95,202 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
Инвестиции на диване @div_invest · 99,490 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Аналитика Т-Инвестиций @t_analytics_official · 72,781 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
MMI @russianmacro · 103,125 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
ВТБ Моя Аналитика @omyinvestments · 212,297 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
IF Stocks @if_stocks · 121,022 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
СМАРТЛАБ НОВОСТИ @newssmartlab · 64,278 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
Финансовая нeзaвисимость @fndb777 · 66,341 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
СберИнвестиции @SberInvestments · 254,078 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
Агрегатор инвест идей | pro.finansy @investforbegginers · 58,603 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
bitkogan⚡️HOTLINE @bitkogan_hotline · 82,858 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
РынкиДеньгиВласть | РДВ @AK47pfl · 116,226 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
Банк России @centralbank_russia · 244,894 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
Кира Юхтенко @kira_pronira · 65,237 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 August 2026
Альфа-Капитал @alfacapital · 212,841 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Деньги из бетона — Недвижимость РФ @if_estate · 64,347 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Дивиденды | pro.finansy @div_profinansy · 75,433 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДОХОДЪ” (@dohod), 70,459 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dohod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.