Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Signed Sergey Ray

Channel
@cryptomorfeus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,131subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001592613452 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptomorfeus |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptomorfeus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 1,131 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 1,130 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 1,128 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 1,130 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 1,136 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 1,138 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 1,137 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 1,138 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 1,138 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
135 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 82 | 60.7% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 25.9% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 3.70% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 2.96% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| custom 5413794461152978282 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.48% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptomorfeus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 April 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Signed Sergey Ray
Куда то мы идем не туда :)
😁6
Signed Sergey Ray
Народное бензиновое творчество прекрасно :-)
😁8
Signed Sergey Ray
Не про крипту, но это прекрасно :-) хотя про крипту писать в целом совсем не о чем. Ждём окончания криптозимы . Так что лучше такое :-)
😁7
Signed Sergey Ray
Photo, posted without a caption
😁9
Signed Sergey Ray
Питер Линч С 1977 по 1990 год управлял фондом Fidelity Magellan, за это время активы фонда выросли с $18 млн до более чем $14 млрд, а средняя годовая доходность составила около 29%. «Я люблю волатильность»
👍1
Signed Sergey Ray
Чуть больше боли на рынке. Похоже было при 16к за биток. Но как будто еще не совсем плохо. Мало статей в сми, что крипте конец :)
Signed Sergey Ray
ИИ НЕСЕТ БОЛЬШИЕ РИСКИ ДЛЯ крипты . Крайне опасная риторика для крипты от владельца топовой компании по аудиту смарт контрактов… Если ИИ способен находить уязвимости в безопасности DeFi и смарт-контрактов, а также банальные лазейки в человеческих ошибках — это может похоронить крипторынок очень надолго. Сейчас единственная тонкая нить надежды в том, что мир больших финансов в виде RWA перетечёт в децентрализованн…
❤1👍1
Signed Sergey Ray
На рынке какое то сумасшествие по экосистеме и токену Хайп. Но не забывайте про статистику 🤙 Если считать соотношение рыночной оценки к прибыли компании, то токен HYPE сейчас торгуется с коэффициентом P/E около 97 Для сравнения: средний коэффициент P/E компаний из индекса S&P 500 составляет 32 (а средний за всю историю – 20) ❓ Что это значит? За каждый 1 доллар прибыли, который зарабатывает Hyperliquid, инвестор…
👍1
Signed Sergey Ray
Photo, posted without a caption
😁2😢2
Signed Sergey Ray
Хорошие новости по KelpDAO 🪙 В ближайшие 2 недели проект планирует возобновить работу. Напомню, что сервис взломали месяц назад и выводы были закрыты. 👉 Хорошая новость в том, что взлом зацепил сразу 3 крупных проекта, поэтому просто сказать "извините, денег нет" не получилось. Весь месяц команды искали финансирование, чтобы компенсировать пострадавшим все убытки. По итогу, деньги нашли. Меня, кстати, этот взлом т…
👍2
Signed Sergey Ray
Хороший пост от Винника по тому что такое стейблы в современном мире. Имейте в виду при серьезных суммах: Это, пожалуй, главный кейс года (хотя еще середины даже нет) про "куда катится крипта":) Ваши USDC может заморозить любая юрфирма США без суда, без обвинения, без права защиты, и вы даже не узнаете за что. Как это работает: 23 марта Circle заморозил 16 кошельков с USDC (Я помню в тот день, как акции Circle силь…
👍5❤3😱2
Signed Sergey Ray
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptomorfeus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Morfeus” (@cryptomorfeus), 1,131 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptomorfeus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.