🔥Самые быстрые новости рынка, фокус на российские акции
⚡️Мгновенные сообщения о дивидендах, сделки, мнения, отчёты, причины роста и падения акций!
👉 Предложить новость: @newssmartlabbot
👉 По рекламе и ВП: @prsmartlab
РКН: https://clck.ru/3SdsYC
Created
29 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -144. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64,128–64,352 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 20:58
64,177
+4
14 Sept 2026, 23:19
64,173
+19
13 Sept 2026, 06:40
64,154
-15
11 Sept 2026, 06:00
64,169
-11
8 Sept 2026, 07:19
64,180
-3
5 Sept 2026, 02:37
64,183
+1
3 Sept 2026, 06:08
64,182
-18
1 Sept 2026, 23:26
64,200
-11
1 Sept 2026, 00:24
64,211
-21
31 Aug 2026, 03:15
64,232
-12
30 Aug 2026, 02:39
64,244
-13
29 Aug 2026, 02:04
64,257
-11
28 Aug 2026, 02:44
64,268
-8
27 Aug 2026, 04:03
64,276
+3
25 Aug 2026, 04:23
64,273
-5
22 Aug 2026, 08:38
64,278
+28
20 Aug 2026, 21:24
64,250
-7
20 Aug 2026, 00:34
64,257
-12
19 Aug 2026, 00:22
64,269
-10
17 Aug 2026, 22:27
64,279
first reading
Engagement
1,319 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.21%
avg views ÷ 64,177 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,990
861 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
861
of 1,319 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 826 of 861 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
1,319 (5 August 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
3,432,706
Reactions total
27,306
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Sept 2026, 01:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈20,000
Videos
≈601
Links
≈120,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 04s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
30,532 reactions across 954 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
12,499
40.9%
👍
5,846
19.1%
🍌
3,753
12.3%
🔥
2,082
6.82%
❤
1,671
5.47%
💔
1,010
3.31%
👀
785
2.57%
🤔
588
1.93%
💯
489
1.60%
🍾
407
1.33%
🫡
403
1.32%
👏
389
1.27%
🌭
380
1.24%
🎉
126
0.413%
custom 5249293339655678907
54
0.177%
🤝
50
0.164%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 959 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,532 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @newssmartlab. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Немецкая АдГ набрала 37% голосов на выборах в земле Мекленбург-Передняя Померания, у партии Мерца - худший результат в послевоенной истории Германии — Bloomberg
«Мы не можем приукрашивать ситуацию, это была катастрофа», — заявил Мерц журналистам.
Читать далее
👉 https://smartlab.news/i/204704
мы в max
Собянин: Сегодня отражена самая массированная атака вражеских беспилотников на Москву, несколько беспилотников достигли территории МНПЗ #SIBN
Читать далее
👉 https://smartlab.news/i/204703
мы в max
Явка на выборах депутатов Госдумы - более 55%, что превышает показатели 1993, 2016 и 2021 годов — РБК
Читать далее
👉 https://smartlab.news/i/204701
мы в max
Маркетплейсы за последние два месяца столкнулись с ростом количества поданных к ним исковых заявлений — Ъ #OZON
Читать далее
👉 https://smartlab.news/i/204700
мы в max
Зеленский: Есть на столе шаги для деэскалации: в энергетике, продовольственной безопасности. Нужна политическая воля
Читать далее
👉 https://smartlab.news/i/204699
мы в max
Трамп: война с Ираном скоро закончится, после чего цены на бензин упадут до прежнего уровня или ниже
Читать далее
👉 https://smartlab.news/i/204697
мы в max
Путин:
- Верхушка в Киеве предлагает якобы возобновить переговорный процесс, но на деле делает всё, чтобы этих переговоров не было.
- Европейцы пытаются спасти свой падающий рейтинг и прикрыть ошибки, говоря о подготовке к войне с Россией.
- У России нет никаких агрессивных намерений в отношении Европы.
Читать далее
👉 https://smartlab.news/i/204693
мы в max
Путин: угроз меньше не становится, НАТО разбухает и расширяется
Читать далее
👉 https://smartlab.news/i/204692
мы в max
🍌55👍8👀6😁6❤2💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,319 posts we hold for @newssmartlab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@newssmartlab edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Дивиденды Forever @divForever · 77,044 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Mozgovik Research | Анализ акций @mozgovikresearch · 23,295 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
СМАРТЛАБ @smartlabnews · 76,476 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Олег Кузьмичев @kuzmlab · 23,332 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Granite Trade | Торопов Степан @karsotel · 25,806 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Инвестируй или проиграешь | Юрий Козлов @invest_or_lost · 27,055 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
NataliaBaffetovna | Инвестиции @NataliBaff · 43,394 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Газпромбанк Инвестиции @gpb_investments · 45,343 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
ПРОГНОЗЫ ПО КОМПАНИЯМ @NataliaForecast · 30,911 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
ИнвестТема | Литвинов Владимир @particular_trader · 35,526 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
TAUREN ИНВЕСТИЦИИ | Егор Федосов @taurenin · 51,393 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Павел Шумилов - инвестиции, разборы компаний @ShumilovPavel · 31,255 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Market Power @marketpowercomics · 31,702 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
🏴☠️Срочно! Идея от Черных @srochno_chernyh · 25,717 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
Вредный Инвестор @harmfulinvestor · 30,880 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Обучалка @obuchalkaof · 40,152 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
ЗЛОЙ ФИНАНСИСТ 😡 @finpizdec · 54,899 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Российские акции @russia_companies · 25,414 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
Invest Heroes @InvestHeroes · 40,074 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
БКС Экспресс @bcs_express · 56,675 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Сигналы РЦБ @cbrstocks · 117,627 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
Усиленные Инвестиции @eninv · 23,429 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 September 2026
Артем Тузов. Финансы и инвестиции @tuzov_invest · 27,614 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
ПРАЙМ @prime1 · 44,580 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 130 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СМАРТЛАБ НОВОСТИ” (@newssmartlab), 64,177 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newssmartlab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.