Публичный канал компании «Усиленные Инвестиции» и ее основателя К. Кузнецова
Обзор компаний, событий на рынке
(не ИИР)
Портал https://eninvs.com
Контакты:
СЕО @k_s_kuznetsov
Трейдинг @m_s_kuznetsov
Общие вопросы @Azarov_VV
РКН: № 7517435214
Created
14 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 59 days, net +522. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,980–23,702 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 07:54
23,619
+111
25 Sept 2026, 19:22
23,508
+79
19 Sept 2026, 01:57
23,429
+9
16 Sept 2026, 15:21
23,420
+2
14 Sept 2026, 18:57
23,418
+14
13 Sept 2026, 06:16
23,404
+9
11 Sept 2026, 11:38
23,395
+46
8 Sept 2026, 20:40
23,349
+20
5 Sept 2026, 10:18
23,329
+27
3 Sept 2026, 14:39
23,302
-7
2 Sept 2026, 05:13
23,309
+10
1 Sept 2026, 03:04
23,299
-1
31 Aug 2026, 04:05
23,300
-7
30 Aug 2026, 07:16
23,307
+13
29 Aug 2026, 07:44
23,294
+7
28 Aug 2026, 05:34
23,287
+12
27 Aug 2026, 02:02
23,275
+12
26 Aug 2026, 00:03
23,263
+14
25 Aug 2026, 00:34
23,249
+42
23 Aug 2026, 15:46
23,207
first reading
Engagement
105 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 23,619 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,530
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 105 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
105 (31 July 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
133,950
Reactions total
2,100
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Oct 2026, 01:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,300
Videos
≈73
Links
≈2,150
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,649 reactions across 101 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,447
74.1%
❤
895
19.3%
custom 5192720120627104617
213
4.58%
custom 5195087240312685144
94
2.02%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,669 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
40
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 104 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eninv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 105 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#SMLT #облигации
Как и обещали, разобрали облигации Самолета по вашим просьбам – получилось 50 на 50.
Рынок оценивает шанс вовремя пройти февральскую оферту П11 примерно как подбрасывание монетки. По ценам 6 октября: выпуск 01 (30 октября) – 97%, П13 (январь) – 56-69%, оферта П11 (февраль) – 33-51%. Длинные выпуски стоят 56-68% номинала
За: банкам выгоднее, чтобы группа достроила дома. Сбер и ВТБ давали группе 360…
Справочно хочется отметить, что в описанном выше случае (как и в ряде других), скам называли скамом не брокеры (получающие комиссию от размещения), не площадка размещения, не регулятор (который по идее то должен следить за таким, хотя бы в части вывода средств через сделки со связанными сторонами) - а именно блогеры, те кого сейчас намереваются зарегулировать!
Мы уже несем плату за негативные обзоры которые иногда п…
#KLVZ #облигации
Разобрали облигации КЛВЗ Кристалл по запросам подписчиков: доходность около 50%, но мы бы держались подальше.
На IPO в феврале 2024 года компанию продали по 117 годовым прибылям завода. Собственник обещал за три года рост выручки в 5 раз. Выручка выросла на 35%, чистая прибыль снизилась, МСФО так и не появилась. Акция стоит 1,9 рубля против 9,5 на размещении. Мы ещё в ноябре 2023 года называли это …
🇰🇿 #HSBK #KZ
Казахстан: экономика растёт почти на 6% в год, а компании платят дивиденды около 10% - новое видео
YouTube | VK
25 лет роста быстрее мира
С 2000 года ВВП Казахстана рос в среднем на 5.8% в год против 3.5% у мировой экономики и обгонял мир в 22 годах из 26. Итого рост в 4.3 раза против 2.5
И замедляться пока не собирается
На 2026 МВФ ждёт 4.6% против 3.1% у мира
Внутри - компании с дивдоходностью около…
💵 #USD #рубль
Минфин кратно нарастил покупки валюты – как мы и ожидали: 12,7 млрд ₽ в день против 2,5 млрд в сентябре
С 7 октября по 6 ноября Минфин купит валюты и золота на 279 млрд ₽. Мы ждали около 10 млрд в день – почти попали, факт даже выше. С учётом продаж ЦБ государство нетто покупает около 12 млрд ₽ в день – максимум с начала разворота в мае
Валюта реагирует ростом
Юань на Мосбирже с утра +0,7% к закрытию п…
💵 #USD #рубль
Доллар к концу 2027: в прогнозе правительства 87 ₽, мы ждём 95–100 ₽ – новое видео
YouTube | VK
Сегодня в 12:00 Минфин объявит покупки валюты на 7 октября – 6 ноября. Мы ждём рост в разы, около 10 млрд ₽ в день против 2,5 млрд в сентябре
Октябрьский объём считают по сентябрьской нефти: налоговая цена Urals выросла с $67 до $92 при базе правила $59
Прогноз правительства – 87,4 ₽ в среднем за 2027 год п…
#weekly
Рос. портфель на неделе вырос на +0.4% вместе с индексом Мосбиржи +0.5% – продолжает восстанавливаться OZON, но несколько надавила на результат валютная позиция
Российский рынок завершил неделю небольшим ростом на ожиданиях возобновления переговоров России и США
- В начале недели на рынок давила публикация Reuters о повышении оценки дефицита федерального бюджета на 2026 год почти вдвое – с 3.8 до 7.3 трлн р…
🛒 #X5 #инфляция
Цены после выборов ускорились в 2-3 раза: проверили по Росстату и посчитали, что это значит для X5 – новое видео
YouTube | VK
Продукты без овощей и фруктов после выборов дорожают темпом 13% в год
За две недели до выборов было около 5%. Неделя 15-21 сентября как раз заканчивается первым днём после выборов
Всё продовольствие вместе с овощами тоже ускорилось – с -2% до +5% годовых
Сильнее не даёт дешёв…
#пятничное
Издание Собака записало интервью с нами (со мной и братом - партнером по бизнесу) и сделали "дофаминовые" образы - необычно, смело, прикольно; спасибо!)
Вот запись с бекстейджа
немного на breaking bad правда похоже как будто бы!
Главное на рынке — с Кириллом Кузнецовым
Разбираем ключевые темы недели с основателем проекта «Усиленные Инвестиции» и вице-президентом Группы Спутник Кириллом Кузнецовым.
🟥 Бюджет и налоги
Чтобы снизить дефицит бюджета, Минфин предложил облагать прирост капитала, дивиденды и купоны налогом по общей шкале 13–22% вместе с зарплатой. При доходе выше 200 тысяч рублей в месяц ставка на инвестдоход фактически растёт с 1…
#MBNK
МТС Банк: потенциал переоценки за счет роста ROE и дивидендных выплат
Прибыль восстановилась с низкой базы
Во 2 квартале МТС Банк заработал 4.7 млрд руб против 2.5 млрд год назад.
ROE снова двузначный
17.6% во 2 квартале по методике банка, 13.5% по нашим расчётам после вычета купонов по бессрочным облигациям из прибыли при сохранении базы капитала без суборда. В трёх кварталах из последних четырёх ROE был вы…
#T #сделки
Т покупает Точку по апрельской цене, хотя из Точки, по нашей оценке, уже выплатили около 20 млрд – переплата около 38%
1 октября Т-Технологии раскрыли условия: 84,8 млрд за 100% Точки, 64% новыми акциями по 320 рублей, остальное – 30,5 млрд деньгами в долг. Это ровно та цена, по которой Интеррос в апреле купил 25% Точки у VK
С апреля из Точки выплачивали дивиденды, а цена не изменилась
В июне капитал бан…
👍47❤8custom 51927201206271046174
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @eninv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@eninv edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выбираем наиболее важную интересную шокирующую новость дня!
Пот. рост налогов на дивы и прирост для с 15% до 22% для людей с доходами до 2.4 м.р.73%
Пот. рост налогов на норникель и золотовиков но нефтянников и банки21%
Снижение цены отсечения до 50 (лонг валюты, не ИИР!)15%
Ускорение индексации сетей в след году15%
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Invest Heroes @InvestHeroes · 39,972 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
Сергей Пирогов @PirogovLive · 27,734 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Алексей Линецкий @alexeylinetsky · 30,132 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
P.S investing @malishok_fonda · 26,130 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
Market Power @marketpowercomics · 31,615 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
InveStory @investorylife · 19,587 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 October 2026
Mozgovik Research | Анализ акций @mozgovikresearch · 23,279 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
Granite Trade | Торопов Степан @karsotel · 25,790 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Газпромбанк Инвестиции @gpb_investments · 45,156 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Залим Сохов - ON FLEEK investing @onfleek419 · 37,191 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
PROFIT @profit1 · 191,943 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Ренат Валеев @renat_vv · 19,631 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
Тимофей Мартынов @martynovtim · 36,308 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
NataliaBaffetovna | Инвестиции @NataliBaff · 43,270 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Alfa Wealth @alfawealth · 55,803 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
ИнвестТема | Литвинов Владимир @particular_trader · 35,379 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
ИнвестократЪ | Георгий Аведиков @investokrat · 31,807 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
Вредный Инвестор @harmfulinvestor · 30,901 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
БКС Экспресс @bcs_express · 56,511 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
БКС Мир инвестиций @bcs_world_of_investments · 36,461 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Олег Кузьмичев @kuzmlab · 23,308 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Артем Тузов. Финансы и инвестиции @tuzov_invest · 27,820 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
💰 WALL STREET PRO @thewallstreetpro · 46,471 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
ДОХОДЪ @dohod · 70,439 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Усиленные Инвестиции” (@eninv), 23,619 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eninv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.