Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Антон Поляков (Poly_invest)

Channel

Антон Поляков (Poly_invest)

@Polyakov_Ant

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,831subscribers

-223 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001552060878
TypeChannel
Username@Polyakov_Ant
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Polyakov_Ant

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,81916,05415,936.56 August 2026 — 16,054 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,044 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,038 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,031 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,027 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,022 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,027 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,022 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,015 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,006 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,003 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,999 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,995 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,980 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,974 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,984 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,982 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,969 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,964 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,965 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,957 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,954 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,950 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,948 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,952 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,944 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,947 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,933 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,931 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,920 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,911 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,906 subscribers26 September 2026 — 15,892 subscribers4 October 2026 — 15,860 subscribers8 October 2026 — 15,856 subscribers13 October 2026 — 15,857 subscribers14 October 2026 — 15,861 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,863 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,864 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,867 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,866 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,865 subscribers20 October 2026 — 15,858 subscribers21 October 2026 — 15,847 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,844 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,835 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,838 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,828 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,824 subscribers28 October 2026 — 15,819 subscribers29 October 2026 — 15,821 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,823 subscribers1 November 2026 — 15,824 subscribers2 November 2026 — 15,830 subscribers4 November 2026 — 15,831 subscribers15,8316 August 20264 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 90 days, net -223. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,784–16,089 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 02:1815,831+1
2 Nov 2026, 23:5415,830+6
1 Nov 2026, 21:4815,824+1
30 Oct 2026, 17:5615,823+2
29 Oct 2026, 18:1915,821+2
28 Oct 2026, 16:0715,819-5
27 Oct 2026, 18:5615,824-4
26 Oct 2026, 21:4415,828-10
24 Oct 2026, 21:3515,838+3
23 Oct 2026, 19:1815,835-9
22 Oct 2026, 18:2915,844-3
21 Oct 2026, 17:0815,847-11
20 Oct 2026, 13:4015,858-7
19 Oct 2026, 13:5615,865-1
18 Oct 2026, 15:4615,866-1
17 Oct 2026, 16:5615,867+3
16 Oct 2026, 15:5415,864+1
15 Oct 2026, 16:0415,863+2
14 Oct 2026, 13:3015,861+4
13 Oct 2026, 04:2715,857first reading

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 15,831 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,770
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 102 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held102 (29 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total63,670
Reactions total675
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 16:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,510 reactions across 98 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,30651.1%
😁68215.1%
❤55712.4%
🔥2736.05%
😭1212.68%
👎1142.53%
🤣1002.22%
😢942.08%
💯611.35%
🥴350.776%
🤝300.665%
👏210.466%
👌160.355%
❤‍🔥120.266%
🗿120.266%
🤔110.244%
💊100.222%
😐100.222%
🤬80.177%
🐳60.133%
11 further kinds310.687%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 100 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,599 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 101 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Polyakov_Ant. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 102 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,240 views24 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Видео уже на канале. Тема: "Почему в России вечная инфляция — честный разбор" https://youtu.be/UXjMjPhIaz0 Важные ссылки: boosty Доступ к ИИС + ранний доступ ко всем видео: clck.ru/3PQqwc Информация о моем фонде ИПИФ "Поляков инвестиции": https://clck.ru/3Tgaxf 00:00 О чём сегодня поговорим? 05:41 Какие налоги платит предприятие 08:52 Почему одинаковые проценты требуют разных денег 10:36 Почему фабрика откла…

👍13❤10👎1

3 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC≈1,500 views13 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍12👎1

3 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC≈1,420 views23 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Почему одним компаниям доверяют больше, другим меньше, а кому-то безусловно? На российском фондовом рынке достаточно компаний с масштабным бизнесом и государственной поддержкой. Но немногим удаётся одновременно наращивать прибыль, сохранять устойчивость и платить дивиденды. Сбер выделяется именно этим сочетанием. Секрет успеха не просто в статусе крупнейшего банка страны, а в способности превращать масштаб в эффекти…

👍19❤3👎1

2 Nov 2026, 07:08 UTC≈2,030 views15 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍12👎3

2 Nov 2026, 07:08 UTC≈1,950 views35 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Почему я не спешу обратно в акции? Мой план заработка на следующий рыночный цикл Российские акции опять в эйфории. Нефть по 110–120$, разговоры о мирных переговорах, котировки летят вверх. Похожий праздник уже был на рубеже 2025-26 годов и за ним последовало почти полгода падения. Сейчас нефтегаз действительно выигрывает от конфликта вокруг Ирана, а остальные акции растут на надежде на мир. И да, сейчас покупки зав…

👍24❤8👎3

30 Oct 2026, 16:25 UTC≈2,920 views29 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍28👎1

30 Oct 2026, 16:25 UTC≈2,620 views24 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Действительно ли российские акции стоят так же дешево, как об этом говорят? На российском рынке низкие мультипликаторы стали самостоятельным инвестиционным аргументом. При цене в 4-5 годовых прибылей компанию легко счесть недооцененной. Но цена акции коррелирует с деньгами, которые бизнес сможет передать собственникам в будущем. Если инвесторы годами отказываются платить за эти деньги больше, нужно выяснить причины…

👍19❤4👎1

30 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC≈2,700 views39 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Видео уже на канале. Тема: "Почему я не спешу обратно в акции — мой план заработка на следующий рыночный цикл" https://youtu.be/dEm9d5FZbpw Важные ссылки: boosty Доступ к ИИС + ранний доступ ко всем видео: clck.ru/3PQqwc Информация о моем фонде ИПИФ "Поляков инвестиции": https://clck.ru/3Tgaxf 00:00 О чём сегодня поговорим? 00:43 Что происходит на рынке? Эйфория 03:41 ЦБ и ставка 06:19 Бюджет на 2027-2029 го…

🔥22👍12❤3👎2

29 Oct 2026, 09:56 UTC≈2,780 views23 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭12🤷‍♂5👍3👎2🤬1

29 Oct 2026, 09:56 UTC≈2,800 views34 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Прилетело откуда не ждали! Как можно оказаться правым и все равно проиграть (на примере PLZL)? Можно правильно спрогнозировать движение цены, выбрать прибыльный бизнес и все равно проиграть в, как вам казалось, супервыигрышной ситуации. Историю Полюса вполне можно вписать в топ неожиданных кейсов в пособие для инвестора. Месторождения никуда не делись, золото осталось золотом, цена подросла, а компания тольков день…

👍27❤5👎2

28 Oct 2026, 10:25 UTC≈2,650 views31 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁30👎1

28 Oct 2026, 10:25 UTC≈2,700 views40 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Почему российские акции годами торгуются дешево? И дело не только в геополитике Вы можете правильно выбрать бизнес, угадать рост его прибыли и всё равно остаться разочарованной акционером. Компания продолжит зарабатывать, но до вас эти деньги могут и не дойти. Читая комментарии, обычно обсуждают две вещи: растет ли акция и сколько она платит дивидендов? Это реально то, что и волнует рынок. Подорожало, значит хороше…

👍37👎2❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @Polyakov_Ant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

БКС Мир инвестиций
@bcs_world_of_investments · 36,259
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Усиленные Инвестиции
@eninv · 24,138
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 September 2026
Инвестдруг Ольга Сабитова
@olgasabitova · 48,295
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Сергей Пирогов
@PirogovLive · 27,566
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Артем Тузов. Финансы и инвестиции
@tuzov_invest · 27,739
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Вредный Инвестор
@harmfulinvestor · 30,906
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Инвестиции - просто!
@bessonov_invest · 20,596
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 September 2026
Российские акции
@russia_companies · 25,332
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
Invest Heroes
@InvestHeroes · 39,780
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
Zakharov Invest
@zakharov_risk · 25,654
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Алексей Линецкий
@alexeylinetsky · 30,421
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
Mozgovik Research | Анализ акций
@mozgovikresearch · 23,484
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
БКС Экспресс
@bcs_express · 56,153
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
TAUREN ИНВЕСТИЦИИ | Егор Федосов
@taurenin · 50,993
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
P.S investing
@malishok_fonda · 25,716
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
Путь инвестора (Давыдов Артем)
@put_investor · 32,532
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Тимофей Мартынов
@martynovtim · 36,621
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Дивпрогнозы | Инвестминт
@divalerts · 19,732
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
Олег Кузьмичев
@kuzmlab · 23,393
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Антон Поляков (Poly_invest)” (@Polyakov_Ant), 15,831 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Polyakov_Ant.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.