Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -295. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,748–33,131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 15:38
32,792
-9
15 Sept 2026, 12:58
32,801
-5
13 Sept 2026, 21:01
32,806
-7
12 Sept 2026, 06:58
32,813
-34
10 Sept 2026, 04:40
32,847
-13
6 Sept 2026, 22:19
32,860
-28
4 Sept 2026, 05:15
32,888
-14
2 Sept 2026, 20:45
32,902
-12
1 Sept 2026, 17:25
32,914
-7
31 Aug 2026, 14:42
32,921
-9
29 Aug 2026, 16:03
32,930
-6
28 Aug 2026, 14:38
32,936
-6
27 Aug 2026, 15:02
32,942
-3
26 Aug 2026, 18:33
32,945
-1
25 Aug 2026, 15:46
32,946
-11
24 Aug 2026, 15:42
32,957
-13
23 Aug 2026, 03:03
32,970
-4
21 Aug 2026, 14:06
32,974
+1
20 Aug 2026, 12:03
32,973
-12
19 Aug 2026, 10:14
32,985
first reading
Engagement
63 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 32,792 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,760
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 63 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
63 (19 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
120,420
Reactions total
1,299
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 18:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,890
Videos
≈232
Links
≈2,180
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
36s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,338 reactions across 62 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,454
43.6%
🔥
607
18.2%
😁
318
9.53%
❤
292
8.75%
💯
226
6.77%
🤣
113
3.39%
😢
80
2.40%
🤡
41
1.23%
💩
36
1.08%
🤔
35
1.05%
👎
31
0.929%
🍌
22
0.659%
🤝
19
0.569%
✍
10
0.3%
👏
9
0.27%
🎉
8
0.24%
🕊
8
0.24%
🤬
6
0.18%
👌
3
0.09%
🆒
2
0.06%
12 further kinds
18
0.539%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,338 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⏳ Напоминание: скидка на 6-й сезон «Пути инвестора» действует до 21:00 сегодня
Вчера написал о наборе, и несколько человек спросили в личке, подойдёт ли им клуб. Отвечу коротко.
Клуб подойдёт, если вы:
• уже инвестируете сами и хотите понимать, почему держите конкретные акции
• не хотите каждый раз разбирать отчётность с нуля
• готовы проверять чужую логику, а не слепо копировать сделки
Не подойдёт, если ищете га…
Простыми словами про АЛРОСА
Компания находится на дне сырьевого цикла, однако в этот раз вероятно то, что это не дно цикла а закат индустрии, которая проиграла искусственным бриллиантам, остается надежда на очищающий циклический спад предложения натуральных алмазов. В 2026 будет -40 млн карат относительно 2019 года. Слабые игроки банкротятся или закрывают рудники, АЛРОСА еще держится...
Спрос на продукцию низкий, з…
АЛРОСА (ПАО)
🔹 РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ за 1П 2026:
• Выручка = 92 млрд руб (-33% г/г)
• Чистая прибыль = убыток 9.5 млрд руб (годом ранее прибыль)
• EBITDA = 14.3 млрд руб (-61% г/г)
• Маржинальность EBITDA = 16% против 27% годом ранее
• FCF = отрицательный, сжигание 3.2 руб на акцию за 1П 2026
• Операционный уровень = убыток 5.7 млрд руб от основной деятельности
• Запасы алмазов = 150 млрд руб, это 2/3 годовой выручки
По итога…
Набор в клуб «Путь инвестора» на 6-й сезон открыт!
Когда вкладываешь свои деньги, хочется понимать: почему держишь именно эти компании, стоит ли покупать ещё и что должно измениться, чтобы ты пересмотрел решение
В клубе я показываю весь путь: от отчётности компании до решения в собственном портфеле. Что считаю привлекательным, где предпочитаю подождать и почему. Делюсь не только покупками, но и ошибками, изменением…
В идеале покупаю бизнес, который имеет внушительный "запас на ошибку", таким образом снижаю риск потерять деньги
В инвестициях важно всегда оставаться в игре
Таблица справедливых цен. Как я ей пользуюсь?
В прошлом посте рассказал про 3 слоя оценки бизнеса. Теперь покажу, как использую эти расчеты при выборе акций.
В клубе есть таблица, где собраны мои оценки справедливой стоимости компаний. Можно сравнить их с текущими котировками и понять, что стоит изучить внимательнее, а где цена пока не устраивает.
Но сразу важный момент: самая большая скидка в таблице не означает …
🟡 МТС: новая дивидендная политика.
Акции упали. Разбираем отчёт за 2 квартал 2026 года и новую дивидендную политику, что изменилось и что делать акционеру.
Главное в выпуске:
• Дивиденды вместо 35 руб. около 24,5 руб., прежнего уровня не будет до 2029 года.
• За сделкой по продаже башеннго бизнеса стоит маскировка долга.
• Почему дивдоходность упала с 18% до 13,8% и при чём тут непрозрачный байбэк.
Смотрите до ко…
Как я оцениваю компании: 3 слоя оценки
Акция упала на 30% значит дешево? Не обязательно
P/E = 3x значит брать? Тоже нет
Цена сама по себе не говорит ничего. Мне важно понять, сколько стоит бизнес и за что я отдаю свои деньги. Поэтому смотрю на компанию через 3 слоя, от самого надежного к самому неопределенному. Чем дальше, тем больше предположений и тем выше шанс ошибиться
Слой 1. Стоимость активов. Что у компании…
Тем временем наша Юралс уже выше 100 баксов в наших портах, дороже Brent
Комбинация слабого рубля и снятия санкций может и наших нефтяников отправить в космос, ждем
Сегодня пришла новость, что американцы рассматривают заключения деловых соглашений не дожидаясь окончания конфликта, правда при этом принимают законопроект против российского энергосектора
Биполярка у них походу)
Вчера наткулся на график американской нефтяной компании
ExxonMobil и обратил внимание, что 100 баксов она стоила и в 2008 и в 2014 и в 2025 году, тоже самое в другом их нефтянике Шевроне
А мы на наш рынок гоним, что он не растет. А может так и должно быть, когда в индексе преобладают циклические бизнесы газовиком и нефтяников?
Это понимание может сильно прокачать долгосрочного инвестора в наш рынок
Обратите вниман…
💯17❤6👍6✍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @put_investor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@put_investor edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Российские акции @russia_companies · 25,414 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
Zakharov Invest @zakharov_risk · 25,609 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Cashflow - Ваш денежный поток @CashflowTime · 52,444 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
СИГНАЛЫ от CASHFLOW @Cashflowbuy · 49,536 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Инвестдруг Ольга Сабитова @olgasabitova · 51,403 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Максим Петров | Инвестирование @MaxsimPetrov · 43,473 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Павел Шумилов - инвестиции, разборы компаний @ShumilovPavel · 31,255 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
PROFIT @profit1 · 186,020 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
IF Bonds — Облигации РФ @if_bonds · 94,956 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
Облигации | Invest Assistance @investassistancebonds · 41,695 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
ДИВИДЕНДЫ INVESTMINT @investmint · 55,367 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Кира Юхтенко @kira_pronira · 64,955 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 August 2026
Финансовая нeзaвисимость @fndb777 · 66,033 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
Реальные инвестиции с Булатом @depoinvesting · 30,321 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
IF Stocks @if_stocks · 120,286 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
Аналитика Мосбиржи @analytics_moex · 34,938 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 September 2026
БАЗА Бизнеса | Финансы @BizBazza · 58,399 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Инвестиции с Оксаной Мащенко @investoksana · 51,758 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
Mozgovik Research | Анализ акций @mozgovikresearch · 23,295 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
IF Travel @without_borders_ru · 32,489 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
ПРОГНОЗЫ ПО КОМПАНИЯМ @NataliaForecast · 30,911 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Олег Кузьмичев @kuzmlab · 23,332 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
БКС Мир инвестиций @bcs_world_of_investments · 36,595 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Биржевик | Облигации @birzhevikbondsofficial1 · 22,047 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Путь инвестора (Давыдов Артем)” (@put_investor), 32,792 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/put_investor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.