Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
52 measurements spanning 80 days, net -1,066. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,426–21,885 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Oct 2026, 09:30
20,594
-15
24 Oct 2026, 11:56
20,609
-9
23 Oct 2026, 14:40
20,618
+12
22 Oct 2026, 18:01
20,606
-16
21 Oct 2026, 11:05
20,622
-16
20 Oct 2026, 06:17
20,638
-6
19 Oct 2026, 07:55
20,644
-6
18 Oct 2026, 10:58
20,650
-6
17 Oct 2026, 14:10
20,656
-15
16 Oct 2026, 13:54
20,671
-23
15 Oct 2026, 17:21
20,694
+2
14 Oct 2026, 15:19
20,692
-1
13 Oct 2026, 07:34
20,693
+1
9 Oct 2026, 03:21
20,692
-79
4 Oct 2026, 15:35
20,771
-97
26 Sept 2026, 13:16
20,868
-105
19 Sept 2026, 10:59
20,973
+13
17 Sept 2026, 01:59
20,960
-50
15 Sept 2026, 04:01
21,010
+5
13 Sept 2026, 15:17
21,005
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 57 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2s
Average length
2s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,664 reactions across 54 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5350562964778796270
11,664
100.0%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,328 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🩸Человек с несокрушимой силой воли — есть совершенное оружие.
🩸Человек, властвующий над собой.
🩸Человек, подчинивший себе все свои стремления.Именно такой человек оказывает силовое воздействие на окружающий мир.
🩸Такой человек защищён от непрерывно атакующей людей деструктивной информации извне.
🩸Человек этот имеет твёрдые убеждения, которые являются основой его непоколебимости при преодолении жизненного пути.
🩸Жизне…
🩸Только путь наибольшего сопротивления способен выковать поистине доблестные души.Души,которые общее благо-пользу ставят выше,чем собственные жизни и свободы.
🩸Чем сильнее сопротивление,тем мощнее извержение.
🫡Первое правило любой игры: "Единственный способ поумнеть - играть с более умным противником".
🫡Правило номер два: "Чем искушеннее игра, тем искушеннее соперник".
custom 5350562964778796270209
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @DictatorCryptoDCT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto PROFIT @profit_cryptoss · 20,873 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
Crypto by Nastya Docs @nastya_docs_crypta · 38,209 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
V️enividivici @VENIVIDIVICIASHFXPRO · 3 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
OKX Новости @okx_ru · 3,477,059 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Rezan Invest @rezinv · 19,716 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 September 2026
Криптомир с Оксаной Мащенко @cryptooxana · 20,578 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 September 2026
Арнольд Криптовалютный @ArnoldCrypto · 30,540 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Lost Dogs Co Ru @lostdogscoru · 210,781 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Обучалка @obuchalkaof · 39,804 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Your Premium | Your Notcoin @premium_not · 43,939 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
zicelaqo @zicelaqo · 160,723 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Getgems NFT RU @getgemsrus · 106,478 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Not Fans @notforfans · 137,725 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
TON News @new_ton_news · 187,969 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
КриптоКабан @TheCryptoBoar · 128,872 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Futureverse ($ROOT) @futureverse_meta · 33,235 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
Roxman печатает… @roxtalk · 459,343 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Новости Walt (ранее Кошелёк) @walt_news_cis · 1,096,938 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
NOTCOINS @notcoins · 59,547 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
INSpace | Инвестиции @INSpac3 · 33,606 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
Филатов Дмитрий @fil100 · 97,696 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
SosisochnayaGazeta @sosisochnayagazeta · 73,078 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Not a Trader @notatraderrr · 134,816 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Tom Capital @tomcapital · 31,486 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 74 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dictator Crypto” (@DictatorCryptoDCT), 20,594 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DictatorCryptoDCT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
