И сетапчик вам на шорт AAPL из клуба, можно по текущим (324,8) взять немного с добором в указанной зоне 😉
👍27✍3🤝3👌2❤🔥1🍾1🕊1

Channel
@profit_cryptoss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,223subscribers
-186 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001656408715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @profit_cryptoss |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/profit_cryptoss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 21,223 | -19 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 21,242 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 21,244 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:12 | 21,247 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 21,252 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 21,260 | +26 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 21,234 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 21,242 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 21,251 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 21,262 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 21,275 | -19 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 21,294 | -21 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 21,315 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 21,324 | -11 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 21,335 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 21,346 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 21,357 | -15 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 21,372 | -17 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 21,389 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 21,393 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (29 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 57,600 |
| Reactions total | 1,191 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 16:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,726 reactions across 43 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 657 | 38.1% | |
| 🔥 | 425 | 24.6% | |
| ❤ | 261 | 15.1% | |
| 👌 | 104 | 6.03% | |
| ❤🔥 | 103 | 5.97% | |
| 🤝 | 75 | 4.35% | |
| ✍ | 27 | 1.56% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 0.985% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 0.637% | |
| 💩 | 10 | 0.579% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 0.579% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 0.463% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 0.232% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.174% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 0.116% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.116% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.058% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.058% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.058% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.058% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.174% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,726 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И сетапчик вам на шорт AAPL из клуба, можно по текущим (324,8) взять немного с добором в указанной зоне 😉
👍27✍3🤝3👌2❤🔥1🍾1🕊1
#AAPL Шорт Среднесрок 326 - 335 вход, стоп за 345 Цели 300 и ниже
❤21✍5🤝5❤🔥2👍1🤷♀1
Так, оставлю тут переписку из клуба. Ну и последние две идеи (как то все очевидно было слишком) были по S&P500 с конечной в районе 7625, дошли, отскочили немного и пошли пробивать. Учитывая как долго не было коррекции на рынке США - будьте максимально аккуратными с лонгами. Даже поход на 200 пунктов вниз по индексу спровоцирует слив всех рынков хороший ☝️
👌11✍6❤3👍2🤝2❤🔥1
Ребята, всем привет! Хочу напомнить вам про канала Паши, который упоминал вот тут - https://t.me/profit_cryptoss/3039 У него отличная аналитика, сделки, а я сам есть там даже в чате, хотя и не часто пишу 🙈 От души рекомендую его канал ☝️ P.s. С вас подписка, а с меня разбор пары монет в ближайшее время😉
👍19💩3❤2👎2🥱1
Всем привет! Очень странные криптотрейдеры отдыхают не на мальдивах, а через смену деятельности - укладывая плитку на террасе 😁 Не знаю почему, но мы оба хотели давно с Катей хотели попробовать уложить плитку сами, а она еще и порывается из обрезков мозаику на одной стене сделать 😅 У меня было чуток опыта в укладке 15 летней давности, но там было совсем чуток и все очень криво и косо, технологию я не особо знал, а…
🔥65👍34❤🔥11❤4👏3💩2💯1🤝1
Ребят, пробили сегодня зону наконец и бодренько так поехали к 76500 😃 Брали шорты на пробитии?
🔥13❤5👍2🤝1
#Альты А вот тут выглядит все очень печально. Да, некоторые альты стрельнули неплохо вверх, но это касается только Эфира + очень небольшой части альтов. Увы, но я считаю, что 80% монет на рынке продолжит тренд вниз, а сейчас мы видим "отскок дохлой кошки". Никто не хочется шортить по многолетним лоям цены, а на ком тогда рост? Какие то локальные ситуация на лонг можно отрабатывать, но собирать портфель у меня все …
👍29❤8🔥5💩1🕊1🤝1
Ребят, всем привет! Не дали никакого импульса данные, так как вышли ровно такими, как и ожидали. Но, сценарий, что рисовал - актуален, вверх выбили, ждем возврата под 78900 + небольшого закрепа и можно пробовать шорты до 76500 и ниже ☝️
🔥16❤6🤝3
Ребят, небольшой совет тем, кто активно торгует фьючерсы внутри дня. Давно слежу за каналом трейдера Павла Казанцева: @cryptokazancev Павел также подписан на наш канал. Многие из вас уже знают его и хорошо о нем отзываются. Особенно за сделки и бесплатное обучение. Мы с Павлом часто общаемся, обсуждаем рынок и обмениваемся мнениями ☝️ Понаблюдайте хотя бы неделю-две! Многие уже сказали спасибо за рекомендацию 😉
🔥32👍14👌7❤4💩4👎2👾2🥱1
Signed Sergey Demidkin
Ребят, еще, вот такой вопрос прилетел в чате ☝️ Мы с вами обсуждали тему IV (Implied Volatility) на стриме, но нужно ее еще раз отдельно ее захватить. Implied Volatility (Предполагаемая волатильность) - очень интересный параметр и указывает нам ждет ли рынок резкого движения вверх/вниз на активе (новости, спрос/предложение и т.д.). Параметр указывается для каждого страйка отдельно и показывает, как рынок оценивает…
🤝16🔥11❤4❤🔥1👍1
Signed Sergey Demidkin
Так, ложного вверх не вышло, но цель пока все та же - 76000 - 76500, где уже буду смотреть реакцию и думать! Все альты выглядят слабо, зоны поддержки пониже по большинству. Гляну реакцию на зону, что указал выше и посмотрим после этого лонги по альтам, если реакция будет хорошая ☝️
👍26❤1
Signed Sergey Demidkin
Всем привет! Сверху репост из клуба, это примерный сценарий, который ожидания на выходе данных США сегодня в 15:30! Данные очень важные на них может начаться разворот рынка США вниз, который захватит с собой все остальные рынки ☝️
👍26❤11🤝4
Signed Sergey Demidkin
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @profit_cryptoss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto PROFIT” (@profit_cryptoss), 21,223 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profit_cryptoss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.