Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Путь трейдера (Давыдов Артем)

Channel

Путь трейдера (Давыдов Артем)

@put_tradera

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,832subscribers

-67 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001688847014
TypeChannel
Username@put_tradera
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/put_tradera

Growth

8,8328,8998,865.57 August 2026 — 8,899 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,899 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,891 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,882 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,873 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,863 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,855 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,844 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,835 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,832 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 25 days, net -67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,822–8,909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 05:168,832-3
29 Aug 2026, 05:128,835-9
26 Aug 2026, 04:598,844-11
22 Aug 2026, 21:578,855-8
19 Aug 2026, 12:468,863-10
16 Aug 2026, 08:388,873-9
13 Aug 2026, 04:388,882-9
10 Aug 2026, 10:568,891-8
7 Aug 2026, 08:308,899no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:268,899first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 8,832 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.984%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held25 (8 June 202623 August 2026)
Views total5,386
Reactions total53
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

547 reactions across 25 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍21940.0%
🔥9216.8%
🤡529.51%
😱386.95%
😁366.58%
325.85%
🥴224.02%
🙏173.11%
💯81.46%
🤣71.28%
🤔61.10%
😐50.914%
30.548%
🙊30.548%
🎃20.366%
🤝20.366%
🐳10.183%
🙉10.183%
🤩10.183%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 547 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC732 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🔴 Headhunter: дивиденды В ДОЛГ?! Друзья, вышло новое видео с разбором Headhunter за 2-й квартал! Компания анонсировала 200 руб. дивидендов (7.3%) и выкупает акции на 15 млрд, но рост выручки упал до 0%. Сможет ли Хэдхантер платить дальше и стоит ли покупать акции прямо сейчас? 🎬 Смотреть видео: https://youtu.be/1at8QvIe0wg

👍5🔥2🤝1

21 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC970 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁9🔥32

21 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC904 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#IRUS дни Если перевернуть график индекса Московской биржи, то очень похоже на ГиП (голова и плечи) Возможно идем обратно на 2300

👍9💯3🔥2🙏1

18 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC≈1,200 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🔥 На YouTube вышел разбор отчёта X5 Group за 2 квартал 2026 года! Разбираем ключевые цифры лидера рынка: — Замедление роста выручки и продажи — Давление процентных расходов на чистую прибыль — Оптимизация сети и свободный денежный поток — Прогноз по дивидендам за 2-е полугодие 2026 (~150₽?) 👉 Смотреть новый ролик: https://youtu.be/eBzRBETQsp0

👍7

9 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,580 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📊 Разбор отчёта OZON за 2-й квартал 2026! • Выручка +47%, GMV 1.3 трлн ₽, прибыль 10 млрд ₽ • OZON vs Wildberries чья модель устойчивее к атакам? • Что происходит с маржой Финтеха и стоит ли брать акции? 🎬 Смотреть на YouTube: https://youtu.be/mMIxHVKy2Bs

👍7🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC≈2,090 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

ПРОЖАРКА ЯНДЕКСА, новое видео уже на канале Яндекс отчитался за 2 квартал 2026 и отчёт получился жарким: — Выручка +16% — EBITDA +35%, рекордные 89 млрд руб. — Чистая прибыль +56% — Эйлер даёт целевую цену 10 000 руб. это х2,5 от текущих — Совкомбанк прогнозирует дивидендную доходность 8,3% уже в 2027 году Звучит слишком хорошо? Вот и я так подумал. Разобрал всё по полочкам: сегменты, маржинальность, денежный пот

👍7

31 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTC≈1,740 views26 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#IMOEX неделя Неделя действительно оказалась растущей Закрытие хорошее для логнустов

14👍6🔥6

29 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,790 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#YDEX Недели 200 недельная средняя неплохо себя показала, поддержка сработала

🔥12👍42

24 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC≈2,170 views39 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#IMOEX недели Если на этих уровнях закроем неделю, следующая тоже вероятно станет растущей

👍31😁4💯2🥴2

16 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC≈2,780 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#IMOEX месяцы Есть еще такой неплохой горизонтальный уровень на месяцах, мы близки к нему

👍15🔥7🤔61

15 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC≈2,560 views52 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#IMOEX недели По индексу следующий хороший уровень поддержки на 1777 пунктов Дойдем или нет?

😁23👍12😱11😐5🐳1

10 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC≈2,700 views30 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#NLMK недели На картинке исторический недельный график НЛМК, есть мощная поддержка чуть ниже текущих уровней 53 -54 руб Тут можно ожидать окончания падения

👍214🎃2🤣2💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @put_tradera. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

СИГНАЛЫ от CASHFLOW
@Cashflowbuy · 49,808
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Cashflow - Ваш денежный поток
@CashflowTime · 52,637
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Инвестдруг Ольга Сабитова
@olgasabitova · 53,374
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Путь трейдера (Давыдов Артем)” (@put_tradera), 8,832 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/put_tradera.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.