Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,230–15,331 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 11:00
15,242
-10
15 Sept 2026, 12:21
15,252
-5
13 Sept 2026, 19:20
15,257
+3
12 Sept 2026, 03:58
15,254
-4
9 Sept 2026, 17:56
15,258
+6
6 Sept 2026, 08:39
15,252
-8
4 Sept 2026, 02:56
15,260
-10
2 Sept 2026, 13:27
15,270
-1
1 Sept 2026, 16:56
15,271
-6
31 Aug 2026, 14:57
15,277
-3
29 Aug 2026, 16:16
15,280
-1
28 Aug 2026, 18:48
15,281
-4
27 Aug 2026, 20:35
15,285
-1
26 Aug 2026, 21:44
15,286
+3
25 Aug 2026, 21:28
15,283
+4
25 Aug 2026, 00:46
15,279
-3
23 Aug 2026, 15:25
15,282
-7
21 Aug 2026, 22:07
15,289
+1
20 Aug 2026, 17:13
15,288
-6
19 Aug 2026, 16:47
15,294
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.1%
avg views ÷ 15,242 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,980
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
21 (1 June 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
3,980
Reactions total
193
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
5,219 reactions across 21 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,124
40.7%
🤣
1,010
19.4%
🔥
786
15.1%
❤
778
14.9%
❤🔥
145
2.78%
🤡
55
1.05%
👏
47
0.901%
🤔
43
0.824%
😭
42
0.805%
👎
37
0.709%
🤝
37
0.709%
💩
27
0.517%
🥴
23
0.441%
😱
19
0.364%
💔
15
0.287%
🐳
9
0.172%
😢
9
0.172%
👻
5
0.096%
🤗
3
0.057%
😈
2
0.038%
2 further kinds
3
0.057%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
159
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 21 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @unsaid_and_dirty. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🏛 Сегодня объявлены результаты аукциона МинФина по размещению ОФЗ. И это важно. Но, мне кажется, сообщество смотрит на событие зачастую лишь с одной упрощённой стороны.
Размещён выпуск ОФЗ-ПК 29031 объёмом 1 триллион рублей при спросе 1,424 трлн с датой погашения 29.07.2042 по средневзвешенной цене 92,51% от номинала. Что это означает?
🏦 Что в моменте с банками найден компромисс, и им предложен действительно неплох…
Ну вы же хотите, хотите увидеть, как я еле сдерживаюсь, чтобы не задушить заживо человека, задающего в 2026 году вопрос, зачем в 2025 году было находиться в рынке, когда есть вкусненький сладенький депозитик, а в рынке страшно и бобо?
Тогда вот вам, пожалуйста, запись моего выступления на Смартлабе! :D
Раскатывать по второму кругу балалайку о банках было как-то не с руки, поэтому сфокусировался на практических и пр…
"Проклятье знания" - очень сильная штука.
Как вы знаете, я неоднократно в своих интервью и текстах говорил о том, что влажные фантазии об однозначном уровне ключевой ставки до завершения СВО абсолютно утопичны. И мне казалось, что в целом рынок должен это понимать, но нет - в том числе на линии пересмотра ожиданий по средним ставкам мы с дешёвого рынка IMOEX 2400 успели съездить до ультрадешёвого IMOEX 1900.
Конечн…
Посмотрел видео Назара об "Инкабе". И дальше будет текст, который Алексею Антонову не понравится.
📝 История "Инкаба" в том, что некогда компания взяла займы на развитие международного бизнеса, который зарабатывал деньги. И "истеричная санкционная повестка"(с) привела к тому, что международка у компании перестала работать в принципе. Какое-то время туда ещё поставлялись полуфабрикаты, но в дальнейшем это стало невозм…
Сегодня у мамы День Рождения, и мама своей деятельностью, живостью подаёт всем пример.
Мама всё делает круто. Она теперь знает, что радость не вчера и не завтра, она сегодня.
Пожелаю маме быть не купюрой, чтобы всем нравится, не запыленным архивом, функция которого - стенографировать прошлое, не эксель-таблицей, предназначенной только сводить формулы.
А быть Человеком. Человек, найдя гармонию внутри себя, всегда м…
Уважаемые авторы телеграм-каналов, внимание!
Прямо сейчас какой-то мамкин пробиватор узнал, как пользоваться сервисами с утечками персональных данных, и массово ходит по личкам, показывая свои выгрузки, вводя в заблуждение страшными опасными "ключами от вашего аккаунта и канала". Которые таковыми не являются. Демонстрируемый ключ вообще к телеге отношения не имеет.
А если админ недостаточно впечатлился - на официаль…
Вы думали, с кринж-контентом на сегодня всё? "Мы ещё даже не начинали" (с).
Люблю я, знаете, вот эти тёплые, ламповые дискуссии с фан базой Смартлаба - это на ютубе у Тимофея Мартынова, например.
Вы это там, приходите 20 июня на конференцию Смартлаба в Питере в 19:00 в зал "Чаплин"... гхм... в глотку мне запихивать... слова... Поговорим о техниках покупки и продажи идей в портфель, которые помогают выжать достойную…
Давненько ничего на тему сбора долгов у нас не было.
А зачем выдумывать - товарищ рылся в бездне моих старых записей ВК и нашёл прекрасное.
Делюсь.
🤣141🥴14👍4❤2😈2👎1💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @unsaid_and_dirty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
P.S investing @malishok_fonda · 26,290 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
Артем Тузов. Финансы и инвестиции @tuzov_invest · 27,614 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Олег Кузьмичев @kuzmlab · 23,332 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Вредный Инвестор @harmfulinvestor · 30,880 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Инвестируй или проиграешь | Юрий Козлов @invest_or_lost · 27,253 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
ИнвестТема | Литвинов Владимир @particular_trader · 35,473 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
igotosochi @igotosochi · 22,145 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Тимофей Мартынов @martynovtim · 35,988 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Ассоциация инвесторов «АВО» @Bondholders · 26,123 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 September 2026
Фининди | Александр Елисеев @Finindie · 72,841 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
Mozgovik Research | Анализ акций @mozgovikresearch · 23,295 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
Сергей Пирогов @PirogovLive · 27,814 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Финуслуги @MoexFinuslugi · 48,310 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Манька Аблигация @marythebond · 44,599 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Invest Era @usamarke1 · 61,168 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
TAUREN ИНВЕСТИЦИИ | Егор Федосов @taurenin · 51,393 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
ИнвестократЪ | Георгий Аведиков @investokrat · 31,915 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
Angry Bonds @angrybonds · 24,215 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Market Power @marketpowercomics · 31,650 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
Усиленные Инвестиции @eninv · 23,508 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 September 2026
Granite Trade | Торопов Степан @karsotel · 25,806 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Залим Сохов - ON FLEEK investing @onfleek419 · 32,688 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
Sid // Инвестиции + @sid_inves · 36,504 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
ДОХОДЪ @dohod · 70,328 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Грязь, долги и инвестиции | Сергей Таболин” (@unsaid_and_dirty), 15,242 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unsaid_and_dirty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.