Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Волк с Мосбиржи 🐺

Channel

Волк с Мосбиржи 🐺

@moexwolf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,427subscribers

-152 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001511455705
TypeChannel
Username@moexwolf
DescriptionВолком родился — овцой не бывать По вопросам рекламы — @moex_wolf
Created26 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/moexwolf

Growth

26,42726,57926,5035 August 2026 — 26,579 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,579 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,577 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,558 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,534 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,526 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,519 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,484 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,473 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,463 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,450 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,446 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,438 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,458 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,506 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,515 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,509 subscribers23 August 2026 — 26,500 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,494 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,467 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,444 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,443 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,448 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,443 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,444 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,441 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,427 subscribers5 August 20261 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 26 days, net -152. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,404–26,602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 08:2626,427-14
31 Aug 2026, 06:3426,441-3
30 Aug 2026, 08:0426,444+1
29 Aug 2026, 07:1326,443-5
28 Aug 2026, 10:3326,448+5
27 Aug 2026, 12:3326,443-1
26 Aug 2026, 14:3526,444-23
25 Aug 2026, 14:5326,467-27
24 Aug 2026, 14:5726,494-6
23 Aug 2026, 00:1526,500-9
21 Aug 2026, 14:2526,509-6
20 Aug 2026, 11:5726,515+9
19 Aug 2026, 10:1226,506+48
18 Aug 2026, 13:1426,458+20
17 Aug 2026, 12:3326,438-8
16 Aug 2026, 02:0426,446-4
14 Aug 2026, 13:5826,450-13
13 Aug 2026, 07:3426,463-10
12 Aug 2026, 04:3226,473-11
11 Aug 2026, 07:3126,484first reading

Engagement

166 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 26,427 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,370
154 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
154
of 166 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 153 of 154 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held166 (29 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total827,340
Reactions total8,974
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 21:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,440
Videos
876
Links
2,950

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
48s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,694 reactions across 145 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡3,08435.5%
😁1,91722.0%
🤣1,70819.6%
custom 52762897302568426995766.63%
👍5215.99%
💯3994.59%
2232.56%
👎860.989%
🌭740.851%
🔥530.61%
🙏260.299%
🏆150.173%
🍾120.138%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 165 of the 166 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,693 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 166 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moexwolf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 166 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC≈1,250 views17 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Ты же понимаешь, что прикидываться чуваком который не в рынке — это кринж?)) Чел, ты буквально позиционируешь себя как профессиональный участник рынка, разбираешь там фсф, капексы и прочее Если я почувствую, что ты меня байтишь и провоцируешь — я тебя укушу

😁9🤣6🤡2

1 Sept 2026, 19:44 UTC≈1,960 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Всем доброй ночи. В периоды MRAKOBESSION стараюсь совершать минимум действий, взял хэджик и стою спокойно, наблюдаю за вакхоналией Все будет хорошо, волчата мои, мы все заработаем, но видимо попозже..

custom 52762897302568426999🌭1

1 Sept 2026, 18:14 UTC≈3,760 views78 reactionsread 1 September 2026

помоекс.

😁41🤣22👍10🌭3custom 52762897302568426992

1 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC≈4,100 views42 reactionsread 1 September 2026

А я правильно понимаю: Силуанов встретился с Бессентом. Ему сказали, что он мракобесие устраивает на рынке долга и щас видим флоатер размещение новое))) Бессент любитель поддержать рынок госдолга))) мб пару советов дал российскому другу и увидим ралли в ОФЗ?..

🤣38🤡4

1 Sept 2026, 10:46 UTC≈4,460 views22 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🤣202

1 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC≈4,400 views24 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Mrakobession on the stock market Растем на ТАСС которые такие, ну может быть прорыв, они же созвонились))

😁18🤡51

1 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC≈4,920 views35 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Каминг аут ЦБ

😁26🤡5👎3🍾1

31 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈5,200 views36 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Не ну давайте по честному. Щас я поддался МРАКОБЕСИЮ Мне не нравится что нифига не понятно че за встреча Бессента, с кем, где и прочее. Короче ХЭДЖ плотный взял на всякий до выяснения всех обстоятельств С ЭТИМ МРАКОБЕСИЕМ

custom 527628973025684269916🤡11🤣6👍21

31 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈5,010 views70 reactionsread 1 September 2026

РАЗ ДВА ТРИ — ШОРТИСТАМ ХАНА С НАМИ БОГ БОЖЕ ХРАНИ РОССИЮ. ФОНДОВЫЙ РЫНОК РОССИИ ЛУЧШИЙ В МИРЕ

👍31🤣24🤡105

31 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC≈4,960 views56 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Так ну че? Продолжать мой СПАМ, что хана шортам — с нами Бог? Я ж могу... РЫНОК ТО ПОДРАСТАЕТ

😁29👎11👍54🤣3custom 52762897302568426993💯1

31 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈4,650 views6 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @centralbank_russiaPhoto

🏦 Опубликован проект Основных направлений единой государственной денежно-кредитной политики на 2027–2029 годы В документе разъясняются цель и основные принципы денежно-кредитной политики. В дополнение к опубликованному в июле базовому сценарию развития экономики на ближайшие три года в проекте представлены три альтернативных сценария — дезинфляционный, проинфляционный и рисковый. Сценарии различаются предпосылками

4😁1custom 52762897302568426991

31 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC≈4,330 views44 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Волчата, мы?

💯19😁16custom 527628973025684269961👎1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 166 posts we hold for @moexwolf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTCAnonymous Poll1,530 voters approx.

У меня кстати скоро день рождение. Угадайте сколько мне лет

  1. Нет даже 18. Какой то шизоид малолетний11%
  2. 18-23. Типичный темщик-зумер. Еще и манера общения такая8%
  3. 24-30. Ну базовый недоспекулянт, недоинвестор. Еще не определился. Пойдет по стопам Тимы Мартынова26%
  4. 31-40. Уже преисполнился в жизни. Прошел все стадии на рынке от 2014 и просто пишет шизу от скуки44%
  5. 40+. Еще не определился по каким стопам идти: Дед с котом или Тима Мартынов с Диасофтом17%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 298,355 of 1,629,419 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

РынкиДеньгиВласть | РДВ
@AK47pfl · 116,046
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
Сигналы РЦБ
@cbrstocks · 117,696
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
TAUREN ИНВЕСТИЦИИ | Егор Федосов
@taurenin · 51,222
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Профита нет. А если найду?
@profitanet · 202,386
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
ALEXANDER POLYARNIY
@alexpolyarniy · 42,182
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
ФИНАНСОВЫЕ ДУМКИ
@MarketDumki · 51,809
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Обучалка
@obuchalkaof · 40,329
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Рашнбизнес
@rusbiz · 110,108
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Сам ты инвестор!
@selfinvestor · 127,530
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
ВТБ Моя Аналитика
@omyinvestments · 210,632
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
СИГНАЛЫ от CASHFLOW
@Cashflowbuy · 49,808
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Инвестиции с Оксаной Мащенко
@investoksana · 51,880
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
Ленивый инвестор
@smfanton · 52,071
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
БАЗА Бизнеса | Финансы
@BizBazza · 58,505
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
IF News
@if_market_news · 119,297
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
Cashflow - Ваш денежный поток
@CashflowTime · 52,682
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Инфляционный шок!
@inflation_shock · 40,050
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
IF Stocks
@if_stocks · 120,719
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
PROFIT
@profit1 · 186,940
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
ВТБ Мои Инвестиции
@brokervtb · 105,677
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Invest Heroes
@InvestHeroes · 40,203
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
headlines
@headlines_for_traders · 115,537
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
#неинвестсовет by Alex Butmanov
@dtiAlgo · 38,166
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Волк с Мосбиржи 🐺” (@moexwolf), 26,427 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moexwolf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.