Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Волк с Мосбиржи 🐺

Channel

Волк с Мосбиржи 🐺

@moexwolf

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,179subscribers

-400 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001511455705
TypeChannel
Username@moexwolf
Created26 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 October 2026
Measurements held44
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/moexwolf

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

26,17626,57926,377.55 August 2026 — 26,579 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,579 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,577 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,558 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,534 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,526 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,519 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,484 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,473 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,463 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,450 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,446 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,438 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,458 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,506 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,515 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,509 subscribers23 August 2026 — 26,500 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,494 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,467 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,444 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,443 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,448 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,443 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,444 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,441 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,427 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,417 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,404 subscribers5 September 2026 — 26,381 subscribers8 September 2026 — 26,347 subscribers11 September 2026 — 26,303 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,294 subscribers15 September 2026 — 26,277 subscribers17 September 2026 — 26,269 subscribers19 September 2026 — 26,259 subscribers26 September 2026 — 26,216 subscribers4 October 2026 — 26,176 subscribers9 October 2026 — 26,211 subscribers13 October 2026 — 26,209 subscribers14 October 2026 — 26,194 subscribers15 October 2026 — 26,178 subscribers16 October 2026 — 26,181 subscribers17 October 2026 — 26,179 subscribers26,1795 August 202617 October 2026
44 measurements spanning 73 days, net -400. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,116–26,639 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Oct 2026, 12:0626,179-2
16 Oct 2026, 13:3826,181+3
15 Oct 2026, 15:1726,178-16
14 Oct 2026, 17:1926,194-15
13 Oct 2026, 07:5026,209-2
9 Oct 2026, 05:5526,211+35
4 Oct 2026, 17:3626,176-40
26 Sept 2026, 17:3726,216-43
19 Sept 2026, 13:1526,259-10
17 Sept 2026, 03:0126,269-8
15 Sept 2026, 04:4026,277-17
13 Sept 2026, 12:2226,294-9
11 Sept 2026, 15:5526,303-44
8 Sept 2026, 22:3726,347-34
5 Sept 2026, 11:5626,381-23
3 Sept 2026, 17:1626,404-13
2 Sept 2026, 11:3726,417-10
1 Sept 2026, 08:2626,427-14
31 Aug 2026, 06:3426,441-3
30 Aug 2026, 08:0426,444first reading

Engagement

347 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 26,179 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,080
162 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
162
of 347 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 161 of 162 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held347 (29 July 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total822,530
Reactions total9,108
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Oct 2026, 03:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 15s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

18,500 reactions across 325 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡4,72425.5%
😁4,41723.9%
🤣4,03321.8%
👍1,2456.73%
💯1,1886.42%
custom 52762897302568426991,1486.21%
❤7073.82%
🔥5232.83%
🌭2161.17%
👎1200.649%
🍾830.449%
🙏680.368%
🏆280.151%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 345 of the 347 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,499 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 347 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 347 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moexwolf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 347 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 16 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Oct 2026, 09:44 UTC≈2,690 views75 reactionsread 17 October 2026
Video

Что делать с убыточными позициями? Ну, ДЕРЖАТЬ И ТЕРПЕТЬ АХАХАХАХАХ А если выбрать правильного брокера, то можно бесплатно кушать в бизнес залах СУПЕР ПОДХОД НА РЫНКЕ:)) Приходите на конференцию Смартлаба! Там все подробно расскажут

😁41🤣27🤡6custom 52762897302568426991

16 Oct 2026, 07:37 UTC≈3,100 views28 reactionsread 17 October 2026

Товарищ ЦБ Обратите внимание, что скоро будет сигнал на покупку Газпрома И также обратите внимание на время сигнала и время когда газпром вырастет и на сколько (время будет один в один)

🤣17🤡8👍2❤1

16 Oct 2026, 00:19 UTC≈3,900 views144 reactions1 Starread 17 October 2026

Однажды, спустя годы, мы будем вспоминать это время совсем иначе. Время притупит остроту разочарований, горечь разбитых надежд. То, что сегодня кажется бесконечным, однажды останется далеко в прошлом. И, наверное, мы даже будем немного скучать. Особенно по самим себе — упрямым, авантюрным и местами безбашенным, еще не до конца разучившимся верить в здравый смысл. И за этой ностальгией будет скрываться тихое облегч…

❤105custom 527628973025684269924🤣5😁4👍3💯3

15 Oct 2026, 23:47 UTC≈3,820 views190 reactions1 Starread 17 October 2026

Сегодня ночью какой-то грустный муд, если честно, волчата мои ПУТИН: СТИМУЛИРОВАНИЕ И УКРЕПЛЕНИЕ ФОНДОВОГО РЫНКА РФ - ОДНА ИЗ НАШИХ ЗАДАЧ, ПОКА ОНА РЕШАЕТСЯ НЕ ПОЛНОСТЬЮ, ХОТЯ ОН УСТОЙЧИВ Прочитал эту новость и немного взгрустнул. А знаете почему взгрустнул? Потому что уже не помню, когда я торговал что-то НОРМАЛЬНОЕ, а не просто спекулировал на МРАКОБЕСИИ играя в МУЗЫКАЛЬНЫЕ СТУЛЬЯ (кто последний тот и с убытком) …

💯120👍35❤20custom 52762897302568426998🤣3🤡2😁2

15 Oct 2026, 14:26 UTC≈4,510 views35 reactionsread 17 October 2026

Давайте гасите старого и все, а то он уже оборзел

🤣28🤡7

15 Oct 2026, 08:18 UTC≈4,790 views85 reactionsread 17 October 2026

Волчата мои, доброе утро Что имеем? Зеленский положил огромный украинский БОРЩ на все призывы Трампа и хочет продолжать бить по НПЗ Нефть снижается Переговоров нет (зеленский уперся) Интересно куда же пойдет рынок?

😁45🤡21🍾8🙏5❤3🌭3

14 Oct 2026, 17:35 UTC≈6,230 views61 reactionsread 17 October 2026

АХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХ АХАХАХАХАХАХАХААХХАХАХАХАХААХАХАХХААХ В Люберцах… ору ГОСПОДИ БОЖЕ МОЙ МЫ НА ЭТОЙ ХЕРНЕ 10 ПУНКТОВ СДЕЛАЛИ

🤣47😁9🤡5

14 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC≈6,170 views20 reactionsread 17 October 2026

https://t.me/cbrstocks/83342 Походу ростелек следующий

🌭8🤣6🤡3👍2custom 52762897302568426991

14 Oct 2026, 12:11 UTC≈5,910 views56 reactionsread 17 October 2026

22.10.2026 2198 У меня скоро самолет. Так что не шалите без меня

🤡27😁12🌭9custom 52762897302568426996👍2

14 Oct 2026, 11:36 UTC≈5,750 views63 reactionsread 17 October 2026
Photo

Индекс Мосбиржи! БУ Испугается? 2435

😁37🤡18💯4❤2👍1🤣1

14 Oct 2026, 11:12 UTC≈5,530 views38 reactionsread 17 October 2026
Photo

Забавно как дед начал за свою жопу переживать Переименовал портфели в «модельные». Приписки не ИИР стал писать Как по утрам убивать трейдеров по пустым стаканам — так он рад А пожинать плоды манипуляций он не хочет. Типичные лицемеры Пишет 100% покупка индекса А через пару минут такой — О! рынок растет!! Тупизм

🤣28💯6❤2🤡2

14 Oct 2026, 10:44 UTC≈5,210 views16 reactionsread 17 October 2026

Мой форкаст 0.27+- вечером недельная инфла будет

😁9💯4👍2🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 347 posts we hold for @moexwolf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Oct 2026, 09:45 UTCAnonymous Poll597 voters

Недельная инфляция тудей

  1. Ниже 0.226%
  2. 0.2-0.2518%
  3. 0.26-0.319%
  4. Выше 0.340%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Sept 2026, 13:09 UTCAnonymous Poll474 voters

ВТБ в октябре

  1. Ниже 5038%
  2. 50-53 останется22%
  3. 558%
  4. 60+ будет🐝37%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTCAnonymous Poll1,530 voters approx.

У меня кстати скоро день рождение. Угадайте сколько мне лет

  1. Нет даже 18. Какой то шизоид малолетний11%
  2. 18-23. Типичный темщик-зумер. Еще и манера общения такая8%
  3. 24-30. Ну базовый недоспекулянт, недоинвестор. Еще не определился. Пойдет по стопам Тимы Мартынова26%
  4. 31-40. Уже преисполнился в жизни. Прошел все стадии на рынке от 2014 и просто пишет шизу от скуки44%
  5. 40+. Еще не определился по каким стопам идти: Дед с котом или Тима Мартынов с Диасофтом17%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 347 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 16 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

РынкиДеньгиВласть | РДВ
@AK47pfl · 115,221
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
Сигналы РЦБ
@cbrstocks · 117,466
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
Stock News
@Stock_News100 · 18,801
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
Sosisochniy Parser RU
@sosisochniyparserru · 21,874
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
TAUREN ИНВЕСТИЦИИ | Егор Федосов
@taurenin · 51,150
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Профита нет. А если найду?
@profitanet · 204,590
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
VM Finance
@vmfinance · 19,041
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 October 2026
Mozgovik Research | Анализ акций
@mozgovikresearch · 23,239
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
ALEXANDER POLYARNIY
@alexpolyarniy · 43,973
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
ФИНАНСОВЫЕ ДУМКИ
@MarketDumki · 52,013
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Олег Кузьмичев
@kuzmlab · 23,321
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Обучалка
@obuchalkaof · 39,870
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Рашнбизнес
@rusbiz · 105,068
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Сам ты инвестор!
@selfinvestor · 127,247
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Русский экономизм
@russianeconomism · 77,085
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
Сигналы для торговли
@signals_stock · 24,949
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
ВТБ Моя Аналитика
@omyinvestments · 207,234
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
Усиленные Инвестиции
@eninv · 24,032
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 September 2026
СИГНАЛЫ от CASHFLOW
@Cashflowbuy · 49,193
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Кот.Финанс
@mkot_finance · 18,943
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 3 October 2026
Angry Bonds
@angrybonds · 24,249
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Инвестиции с Оксаной Мащенко
@investoksana · 51,521
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
Биржевик | Облигации
@birzhevikbondsofficial1 · 21,980
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Ленивый инвестор
@smfanton · 51,809
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Волк с Мосбиржи 🐺” (@moexwolf), 26,179 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moexwolf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.