13 measurements spanning 32 days, net -107. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,591–9,730 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 08:16
9,607
-16
2 Sept 2026, 17:23
9,623
-7
30 Aug 2026, 22:36
9,630
-10
27 Aug 2026, 20:12
9,640
-5
25 Aug 2026, 05:13
9,645
-10
21 Aug 2026, 18:26
9,655
-10
18 Aug 2026, 18:03
9,665
-16
15 Aug 2026, 15:58
9,681
-9
12 Aug 2026, 12:46
9,690
-9
9 Aug 2026, 23:33
9,699
-12
6 Aug 2026, 23:10
9,711
-3
6 Aug 2026, 21:00
9,714
no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:50
9,714
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 9,607 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,280
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held
38 (14 July 2026 – 26 August 2026)
Views total
16,636
Reactions total
321
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,245 reactions across 38 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
596
47.9%
🔥
279
22.4%
❤
224
18.0%
🤝
37
2.97%
😁
34
2.73%
🤣
20
1.61%
🏆
9
0.723%
🤬
7
0.562%
🎉
6
0.482%
🌚
5
0.402%
😱
5
0.402%
🍌
4
0.321%
💊
3
0.241%
👌
2
0.161%
😢
2
0.161%
😴
2
0.161%
🦄
2
0.161%
⚡
1
0.08%
🐳
1
0.08%
👏
1
0.08%
5 further kinds
5
0.402%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,245 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
109
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 38 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
58
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thefinexpert. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💊 Защитный сектор: разбираем отчет Озон Фармы
Рынок у нас такой, что уже не знаешь, откуда прилетит; если не прятаться в депозите или облигациях, то выбор не так велик. Фарма традиционно считается защитной отраслью, и у $OZPH как раз вышел вчера сильный отчет. Посмотрим на него поближе
📌 В 1П2026 чистая прибыль почти удвоилась (+90%) и достигла 3,2 млрд рублей, валовая маржа вышла на 50%, а выручка увеличилась на +…
🔥 Что будет с рынком недвижимости в 2027 году?
Если вы покупаете, продаёте или инвестируете в недвижимость, сейчас самое время смотреть не только на сегодняшние цены, но и на то, что ждёт рынок дальше.
12 сентября мои большие друзья из Smarent проводят ежегодную конференцию «Тренды на рынке недвижимости 2027», где эксперты разберут главные изменения рынка, инвестиционные возможности и прогнозы на следующий год.
В …
🏒 На выходных стартовал Чемпионат лиги Трудовые резервы; подготовку мы начали еще 2 месяца назад, а впереди нас ждут 8 месяцев матчей с финалом на олимпийском стадионе в Сочи
Я впервые встал на коньки в 5 лет - и следующие 7 посвятил профессиональному хоккею. Каждый день у нас были тренировки, иногда даже 2. Тренировал нас легендарный Геннадий Курдин, воспитавший Никиту Кучерова, Никиту Гусева, Игоря Ожиганова, Иван…
❓Что будет с криптовалютой?
❓Золото обновит максимумы и будет стоить $7000?
❓Как меняется мировая финансовая система и чего ждать дальше?
❓Бомба замедленного действия под США, Францией и Японией
Об этом и других важных вещах порассуждал в подкасте выше. Слушаем и ставим реакции
❗️ ВАЖНО для владельцев облигаций ЕВРОТРАНСА
Я много раз писал, что это плохая инвестиция, но часть подписчиков и знакомых все равно держала бумаги. Нет злорадства, только сочувствие. Поэтому хочу что-то сделать, чтобы поменять ситуацию
Где мы сейчас?
5 августа зафиксирован дефолт по 3 выпускам: зелёные серии 01, зелёные 002Р-02 и БО-001Р-09. Купон должен был прийти 21 июля
Банк «Россия» подал заявление о банкрот…
❓Чем я сейчас занимаюсь? Часть 2. Reframe Buro
Чуть больше года назад мы с партнером Романом сделали ИИ-стартап Reframe Buro. За это время мы уже добились первых важных результатов. Рассказываю про пройденный путь - и думаю, что для вас это может быть не только интересно, но и полезно
❓Что мы делаем?
3 направления
1️⃣Обучаем использованию ИИ - не просто даем теорию, а в первую очередь фокусируемся на развитии при…
❓ Где сейчас искать доходность 20%+?
Ставка ЦБ 14%, вклады еще ниже. Полтора года назад даже на депозите можно было заработать 20-22%, так что сейчас вижу все больше интереса к облигациям, и статистические данные это тоже подтверждают. Но где высокие доходности - там и риски соответствующие. Однако риски могут быть в том, что компания помойка, а могут быть вполне просчитываемы и понятны. Второе - про облигации застр…
⚡️ VK вышел в чистую прибыль впервые с 2022 года. Но что за этим стоит?
Утром $VKCO отчитался за 2 квартал и 1 полугодие. К компании у меня были вопросы и ключевой - к финансовым результатам
Что с прибылью, свободным денежным потоком и как обстоят дела с долговой нагрузкой?
Посмотрим на цифры за 2 квартал
• Выручка 43,5 млрд, +17%
• EBITDA 7,6 млрд, +41%
• Рентабельность 17%, +3 п.п.
• Чистая прибыль 328 млн
За п…
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @thefinexpert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
По Евротрансу надо комментировать или и так все понятно?
Надо!37%
Не надо, помянем48%
Не в теме / все равно17%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 209%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Алексей Линецкий @alexeylinetsky · 30,105 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
Залим Сохов - ON FLEEK investing @onfleek419 · 34,183 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
ИнвестТема | Литвинов Владимир @particular_trader · 35,540 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
Газпромбанк Инвестиции @gpb_investments · 45,469 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Сергей Пирогов @PirogovLive · 27,852 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Павел Шумилов - инвестиции, разборы компаний @ShumilovPavel · 31,304 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Инвестируй или проиграешь | Юрий Козлов @invest_or_lost · 27,118 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
Артем Тузов. Финансы и инвестиции @tuzov_invest · 27,506 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Market Power @marketpowercomics · 31,658 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
Invest Heroes @InvestHeroes · 40,135 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
Вредный Инвестор @harmfulinvestor · 30,885 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
ИнвестократЪ | Георгий Аведиков @investokrat · 31,947 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
Tom Capital @tomcapital · 31,465 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
ПРОГНОЗЫ ПО КОМПАНИЯМ @NataliaForecast · 30,965 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Инвестиции с Александром Абрамяном” (@thefinexpert), 9,607 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thefinexpert.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.