🏦Результаты заседания 11 сентября и как они влияют на жизнь простого инвестора Совет директоров Банка России по итогам заседания 11 сентября оставил ставку на уровне 14%. Это первая пауза с апреля 2025 года: до этого было десять снижений подряд, за которые ставка опустилась с 21%. Большинство аналитиков паузу и ждали, хотя часть рынка рассчитывала на шаг вниз на 25 базисных пунктов. Почему регулятор остановился 👇 …

Channel
Лимон на чай
@lemonfortea
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
240,620subscribers
-8,716 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001120395988 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lemonfortea |
| Description | Реальный опыт инвестора, со всеми граблями и успехами. С понятными стратегиями и подробными инструкциями. Цель — стабильный доход от инвестиций 1 лимон рублей. Сайт: lemonfortea.su По рекламе: @KristiinaKovalenko https://clck.ru/3GJ2Az |
| Created | 6 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lemonfortea |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 240,620 | -715 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 241,335 | -533 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:42 | 241,868 | -344 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 242,212 | -330 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:53 | 242,542 | -239 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 242,781 | -235 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 243,016 | -214 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 243,230 | -221 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 243,451 | -244 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 243,695 | -268 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 243,963 | -222 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 244,185 | -309 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 244,494 | -434 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 244,928 | -342 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 245,270 | -269 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 245,539 | -284 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 245,823 | -209 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:19 | 246,032 | -349 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 246,381 | -212 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 246,593 | first reading |
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.68%
- avg views ÷ 240,620 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,050
- 41 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.732%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 41
- of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 41 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 67 (22 July 2026 – 11 September 2026) |
| Views total | 166,021 |
| Reactions total | 1,216 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Sept 2026, 15:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈557
- Videos
- ≈24
- Links
- ≈1,660
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 42s
- Average length
- 4m 42s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,969 reactions across 64 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 781 | 39.7% | |
| ❤ | 553 | 28.1% | |
| 👍 | 320 | 16.3% | |
| 🐳 | 194 | 9.85% | |
| 🤔 | 36 | 1.83% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 1.12% | |
| 🤣 | 14 | 0.711% | |
| 😢 | 13 | 0.66% | |
| 🤮 | 13 | 0.66% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 0.559% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 0.254% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 0.254% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.102% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,006 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 67 we hold a reading for · 1%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lemonfortea. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 67 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 11 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥7❤5
🇪🇺 Почему Европа не может прожить без российского топлива, и что с этого нам Европейская счетная палата выпустила отчет, который The Brussels Times озаглавила без прикрас: планы ЕС не смогут избавить страны от зависимости от российской нефти и газа. Цифры из отчета: За четыре года страны ЕС потратили на программу REPowerEU всего 54,3 млрд евро из предусмотренных 300 млрд, то есть освоили примерно пятую часть. Форм…
👍15❤5👎1🤔1
🤖 Почему 2026-2027-2028 станут вторым медным веком и причем здесь ИИ Первый медный век закончился примерно три тысячи лет назад. Люди научились плавить медь, делали из нее топоры, наконечники и посуду, а потом нашли железо, и медь ушла на второй план. Сейчас она возвращается, только теперь металл нужен не для оружия, а для того, чтобы прокормить электричеством искусственный интеллект. Директор по стратегии «Финама…
🔥58❤11🤣2🤮1
Что решит ЦБ 11го числа?
- Оставит все как есть! 14%38%
- Символическое снижение на 0.25%🥲 13.75%36%
- Снизят сильнее, 0.5 и более %6%
- А могут и повысить!😱8%
- Хочу посмотреть ответы12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤔5
📉 Заседание ЦБ 11 сентября: чего ждать по ставке ЦБ? До заседания несколько дней, и консенсус аналитиков сложился в пользу паузы. Ставка сейчас 14%, и после июльского снижения регулятор перешел от умеренно-мягкого сигнала к нейтральному. Аргументы за сохранение известны: вторая волна топливного кризиса, инфляционные ожидания населения на уровне 13,7%, годовая инфляция около 6,2% и бюджет, который складывается по бо…
❤14🔥6👍4
📺 Я БЫЛ В ЭФИРЕ РБК. И ГОВОРИЛ ПРО ЦИФРОВОЙ РУБЛЬ. Вчера меня пригласили на интервью на РБК. Спрашивали, конечно, про цифровой рубль — потому что сейчас это тема, которая волнует всех. О чём мы говорили в кадре: ❓ Это действительно инструмент тотального контроля или просто эволюция денег? ❓ Почему банки тихо ненавидят эту историю? ❓ Кому выгодно, чтобы вы перешли на цифровой рубль, а кому — нет? ❓ И главное: что эт…
🔥16❤3👍2
А что если вообще не инвестировать? Рубрика: практические ответы на гипотетические вопросы 😁 Обычно на этот вопрос отвечают страшилками про нищую старость. Мне такой подход не нравится, потому что он ничего не объясняет и просто давит на страх. Поэтому вместо этого давайте посчитаем. Берем человека, который откладывает 15 тысяч рублей в месяц, 180 тысяч в год. Вариант первый. Деньги лежат на карте За десять лет…
❤19🔥8👍4🐳1
‼️ Интересные и полезные посты за последнее время, переходите если не успели посмотреть: ✅ Какие акции смотреть осенью 2026? ✅ Когда ждать отдачи от ИИ и чем для рынка опасны новые предложения правообладателей ✅ Лукойл: прибыль выросла в 1,5 раза. Каких дивидендов ждать? ✅ Что купил в портфель дочери в этом месяце ✅ Цифровой рубль: как он изменит жизнь простого россиянина ✅ США по уши в долгах, и уже придумываю…
👍5❤1
🥰Чем мы в «Лимоне» гордимся? Обычно я пишу про рынок, отчеты и ставку, но сегодня хочется отойти от цифр и рассказать о том, что для меня стоит за этим проектом. Первое, чем горжусь: мы ни разу не обещали иксов. За все время существования канала вы не найдете ни одного поста в духе «зашел на всю котлету и утроил капитал за неделю», хотя соблазн был не раз, потому что такие заголовки собирают охваты в разы лучше, че…
❤28👍14🔥5👏1😢1
😱 США по уши в долгах, и уже придумывают, как их не отдавать Недавно мы разбирали материал Рэя Далио про долговой кризис США, где речь шла о механике: долг растет, покупателей на него все меньше, ЦБ включает станок. Теперь у этой истории появилось продолжение. На выходных в The New York Times вышел материал, который стоит прочитать любому, кто держит долларовые активы. Начнем с цифр. Госдолг США составляет 40 трлн…
🔥30❤7👍7🤣4🤬4
💲Цифровой рубль: как он изменит жизнь простого россиянина Про цифровой рубль спрашивают чаще всего в двух формулировках: «это чтобы за нами следить» и «а туда можно вложиться?». Сегодня отвечу на все вопросы. Минутка занудной терминологии об этом киборге. Цифровой рубль — это третья форма национальной валюты, наравне с наличными и безналичными деньгами. Один цифровой рубль всегда равен одному обычному, курс между н…
👍21❤10🔥10🤔6👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @lemonfortea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что решит ЦБ 11го числа?
- Оставит все как есть! 14%38%
- Символическое снижение на 0.25%🥲 13.75%36%
- Снизят сильнее, 0.5 и более %6%
- А могут и повысить!😱8%
- Хочу посмотреть ответы12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Друзья, готовлю для вас эфир на тему акций и облигаций. Чтобы встреча оказалась максимально полезной, хочу узнать, какие темы вас интересуют сильнее всего👇
- Акции. Какие покупать для базы портфеля?40%
- Облигации. Как выбирать ОФЗ?45%
- Как соблюдать баланс инструментов, чтобы портфель был сбалансированным?32%
- Какие инструменты точно переживут кризис?42%
- Свой ответ в комментариях1%
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@tstrep · 23 postsРабота для инвесторов
@jobsinvest · 182 postsCapital Growth Conf'26
@capitalgrowthconf · 6301 postФинам Коллаб
@finam_collab · 3391 postINSIDER UA | Україна | Новини
@insiderukr · 2,186,5491 postИнвест Блогеры
@investbloggers · 51 postMash
@mash · 3,101,3581 postМосквач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 4,146,4691 postРинат Салдинский
@nizamov_rinat · 7501 postГур Л.Н.
@sibwomen1 · 11 postsubNovost_reklama
@subNovost_reklama · 21 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@tb_invest_official · 529,502#1
@smfanton · 52,040#2
@markettwits · 335,855#3
@bitkogan · 260,281#4
@investfuture · 183,955#5
@div_invest · 99,072#6
@AK47pfl · 115,854#7
@cbrstocks · 117,752#8
@profitanet · 203,507#9
@smartlabnews · 76,440#10
@dohod · 70,382#11
@if_stocks · 120,497#12
@finpizdec · 54,960#13
@if_market_news · 119,098#14
@bitkogan_hotline · 82,633#15
@inflation_shock · 39,975#16
@SberInvestments · 253,536#17
@selfinvestor · 127,376#18
@MarketDumki · 51,755#19
@divForever · 77,216#20
@multievan · 876,706#21
@centralbank_russia · 244,180#22
@omyinvestments · 209,542#23
@Finindie · 72,907#24
@sberbank · 731,563#25
@alfa_investments · 726,225#26
@hoolinomics · 98,603#27
@t_jrnl · 98,810#28
@economikal · 118,628#29
@pensiya35 · 123,995#30
@cozytrade · 102,477#31
@bbbreaking · 1,972,015#32
@mash · 3,101,358#33
@banksta · 437,929#34
@headlines_for_traders · 115,386#35
@bankrollo · 454,175#36
@eeusd · 1,156,283#37
@crypto_gst · 578,297#38
@yurasumy · 2,665,433#39
@exploitex · 2,015,674#40
@crypta · 547,575#41
@egocrypton · 445,933#42
@investingcorp · 247,744#43
@CryptoPayk · 156,246#44
@ejdailyru · 644,713#45
@temalebedev · 970,230#46
@Anton_cryptoo · 145,955#47
@birdton · 822,845#48
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,224,316#49
@russianmacro · 102,860#50
@cryptogram_web3 · 410,447#51
@d_code · 391,658#52
@whackdoor · 1,609,139#53
@toncoin_rus · 529,809#54
@divonline · 53,675#55
@tons_base · 491,380#56
@Coin_Post · 292,161#57
@auantonov · 321,696#58
@profit1 · 186,465#59
@finamalert · 75,226#60
@alfawealth · 56,100#61
@hamsterdropru · 57,847#62
@vilarsofree · 868,381#63
@crypto_jeman · 673,094#64
@sale_caviar · 192,801#65
@investorbiz · 125,840#66
@alfabank · 999,543#67
@thewallstreetpro · 46,415#68
@legitimniy · 1,053,146#69
@daoinvestora · 7,429#70
@stalin_gulag · 301,747#71
@playweb4 · 145,065#72
@vcnews · 111,910#73
@lenvies · 1,583,059#74
@finansist_busines · 629,597#75
@DeCenter · 1,849,763#76
@rockettothemooonASHFXPRO · 64,984#77
@crypadvis · 96,153#78
@notcoin · 8,767,658#79
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,133,785#80
@trendingapps · 3,852,638#81
@lostdogscoru · 216,204#82
@boris_rozhin · 738,302#83
@yurydud · 864,469#84
@wylsared · 1,080,832#85
@pocketfi · 1,821,730#86
@yaplakal · 422,248#87
@forbesrussia · 235,518#88
@trendwatching24 · 1,455,654#89
@tonkeeper_ru · 464,543#90
@crypto_tappok · 84,050#91
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@smfanton · 52,040
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
@div_invest · 99,072
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@elonn_news · 32,908
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 September 2026
@investfuture · 183,955
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
@am_first · 49,414
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
@iznytri · 80,419
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@rusbiz · 108,861
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
@divonline · 53,675
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
@silaknigi · 123,104
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
@finraonline · 44,216
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026
@dohod · 70,382
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
@usamarke1 · 60,903
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
@finance_pro_tg · 120,242
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
@fedorinvest · 69,066
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
@showstartup · 27,121
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лимон на чай” (@lemonfortea), 240,620 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lemonfortea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.