Это канал компании «Первая», где управляющие крупными фондами:
• разбирают ключевые события в экономике;
• объясняют, как работают финансовые инструменты.
Дисклеймер: https://clck.ru/34eFj7
Регистрация в Роскомнадзоре: https://clck.ru/3Fz36x
Created
2 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
43 measurements spanning 74 days, net -1,476. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,316–50,234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Oct 2026, 01:36
48,537
-44
18 Oct 2026, 00:28
48,581
-19
16 Oct 2026, 23:31
48,600
-15
15 Oct 2026, 23:49
48,615
-21
15 Oct 2026, 00:17
48,636
-27
13 Oct 2026, 21:34
48,663
-106
10 Oct 2026, 11:00
48,769
-110
6 Oct 2026, 10:58
48,879
-138
1 Oct 2026, 07:15
49,017
-286
18 Sept 2026, 05:41
49,303
-36
15 Sept 2026, 23:59
49,339
-24
14 Sept 2026, 03:39
49,363
-26
12 Sept 2026, 08:36
49,389
-25
10 Sept 2026, 03:00
49,414
-47
6 Sept 2026, 21:58
49,461
-34
4 Sept 2026, 07:39
49,495
-36
2 Sept 2026, 19:03
49,531
-30
1 Sept 2026, 15:35
49,561
-24
31 Aug 2026, 15:56
49,585
-17
30 Aug 2026, 15:07
49,602
first reading
Engagement
88 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 150 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.13%
avg views ÷ 48,537 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,950
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 88 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026
Posts held
88 (24 July 2026 – 19 October 2026)
Views total
134,246
Reactions total
1,830
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
19 Oct 2026, 11:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,670
Videos
≈46
Links
≈606
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 04s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,040 reactions across 87 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,048
40.6%
🔥
1,081
21.4%
👍
928
18.4%
💯
268
5.32%
🤝
115
2.28%
😱
109
2.16%
custom 5373141891321699086
94
1.87%
custom 5325547803936572038
81
1.61%
😁
74
1.47%
❤🔥
49
0.972%
😢
46
0.913%
👎
26
0.516%
😭
23
0.456%
🫡
20
0.397%
⚡
18
0.357%
👏
16
0.317%
🏆
14
0.278%
🤯
10
0.198%
custom 5370953476635368811
7
0.139%
🐳
7
0.139%
1 further kind
6
0.119%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Еженедельный обзор
📈 Рынок продолжает расти
🟢 Индекс Мосбиржи завершил неделю на уровне 2 426 пунктов, прибавив 4,5% и обновив максимум с июня. Поддержку рынку оказали позитивные сигналы в российско-американском диалоге, точечное ослабление санкционного давления и высокие цены на нефть.
🛢 Нефть приблизилась к $110
🟢 Brent завершила неделю на уровне $109,86 за баррель, прибавив 4,9%. Резкий рост в пятницу был свя…
А вот и финальный вопрос!
🤍 Может ли управляющий менять стратегию, если увидел хорошую возможность на рынке?
❤️ — да, если считает сделку потенциально выгодной
👍 — только в пределах, которые допускает стратегия
🔥 — нет, состав портфеля нельзя менять после запуска
Правильный ответ: управляющий может менять состав портфеля и реагировать на рынок. При этом действует только в рамках правил и ограничений выбранной ст…
Проголосовали? Идём дальше!
🤍Зачем перед выбором стратегии определяют инвестиционный профиль?
❤️ — чтобы подобрать подходящий баланс потенциальной доходности и риска
👍 — чтобы понять, какую долю рискованных активов можно включить в портфель
🔥 — чтобы выбрать стратегию с самой высокой ожидаемой доходностью
Правильный ответ: инвестиционный профиль помогает найти баланс между потенциальной доходностью и риском — с …
🧠 Инвесторы, а вы знали, что за каждым решением управляющего стоит целая стратегия?
В доверительном управлении есть свои правила и подходы. И сегодня мы проверим, насколько хорошо вы их знаете.
Поехали! 👇
🤍 Что определяет инвестиционная стратегия в доверительном управлении?
❤️ — какие активы и в каких пределах может использовать управляющий
👍 — какие сделки управляющий обязан совершать каждый месяц
🔥 — какую до…
🔄 Фонды денежного рынка… нишевые?
Ещё пару лет назад их действительно можно было так назвать. Но на фоне высокой ключевой ставки интерес к ним заметно вырос. Сегодня СЧА таких фондов превысила 2,7 трлн ₽, а число частных инвесторов достигло 3 млн человек.
Но что происходит внутри фонда, пока стоимость пая плавно растёт?
Рассказываем!
👀 Что стоит за ежедневной переоценкой пая?
Стоимость пая пересчитывается каждый…
🐑 Если все побежали покупать…
Может, и мне тоже?
Инвесторы, знакомое чувство?
Именно так работает стадный инстинкт — психологическая ловушка, из-за которой мнение большинства начинает казаться правильнее собственного.
🤔 В чём суть ловушки?
⚪️ Наш мозг устроен так, что чувствовать себя частью группы безопаснее, чем идти против неё. Это обычный эволюционный механизм.
⚪️ Сегодня он работает и в инвестициях — всегд…
Еженедельный обзор
📈 Рынок набрал высоту
🔵 Индекс Мосбиржи завершил неделю на уровне 2 402 пунктов, прибавив 5,4%. Главным драйвером роста стали новости о телефонном разговоре президентов России и США и ожидания дальнейшего развития диалога.
🔵 Если индекс удержится выше 2 400 пунктов, следующим ориентиром могут стать 2 450–2 500 пунктов. При этом рынок гособлигаций продолжил снижение: индекс RGBI потерял 0,3% на …
✨ Настоящее будущее уже здесь!
Вчера отгремел большой форум СберИнвестиций. Наши руководители выступали на сессиях, эксперты обсуждали перспективы рынка.
А мы представили первый в России биржевой фонд активного управления, в котором используется система ИИ-агентов для формирования инвестиционного портфеля под контролем управляющего.
✅ Но и это ещё не всё. Собрали главное из выступлений Андрея Бершадского, генераль…
😎 Кто первый? Ну конечно, мы!
Не зря же наша УК называется «Первая»!
Именно поэтому запускаем первый в России биржевой фонд активного управления «Искусственный интеллект» (AIIQ), где система ИИ-агентов способна самостоятельно отбирать акции для портфеля.
Рассказываем, как он устроен!
🤖 Как это будет работать?
Фонд инвестирует в основном в акции российских компаний, которые подбирают четыре разных ИИ-агента. У ка…
❤52🔥31👏6👍3👎2😱2❤🔥1custom 53709534766353688111
Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @am_first. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
KEEMALA👩🍳рецепты и надежная техника для кухни @keemala_shop · 5,841#89
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
СберПремьер @sberpremiernew · 106,597 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
СберИнвестиции @SberInvestments · 252,894 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
КИТ Финанс Брокер @KIT_finance_broker · 33,069 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
ТВОЙ ПРАЙМ @sber_spasibo · 85,878 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 October 2026
Цифра брокер @vse_v_cifre · 19,510 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 4 October 2026
БанкБлог @bank_blog · 20,622 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 October 2026
таскам время, потехе час @poteha_time · 428,004 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
IF Travel @without_borders_ru · 32,230 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
ВТБ Мои Инвестиции @brokervtb · 119,534 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
СберМобайл @sbermobile_official · 23,855 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Первый инвестиционный” (@am_first), 48,537 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/am_first.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.