Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дневник Марии Поденко

Channel

Дневник Марии Поденко

@mariapodenko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,500subscribers

+69 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001552183918
TypeChannel
Username@mariapodenko
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mariapodenko

Growth

7,4067,5057,455.56 August 2026 — 7,431 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,431 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,413 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,406 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,493 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,484 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,473 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,464 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,454 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,505 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,500 subscribers7,5006 August 20261 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 26 days, net +69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,391–7,520 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 06:277,500-5
29 Aug 2026, 08:057,505+51
26 Aug 2026, 17:447,454-10
23 Aug 2026, 21:377,464-9
20 Aug 2026, 09:567,473-11
17 Aug 2026, 20:167,484-9
14 Aug 2026, 21:467,493+87
11 Aug 2026, 22:227,406-7
9 Aug 2026, 07:537,413-18
6 Aug 2026, 03:077,431no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:147,431first reading

Engagement

72 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 7,500 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 72 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held72 (30 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total61,254
Reactions total2,269
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,484 reactions across 68 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,42757.4%
🔥52221.0%
😍1194.79%
👍1024.11%
🥰983.95%
❤‍🔥401.61%
😁381.53%
👏351.41%
💯291.17%
💔240.966%
🤣110.443%
🤝60.242%
40.161%
40.161%
🏆40.161%
🙏40.161%
👌30.121%
🤩30.121%
👎20.081%
😢20.081%
7 further kinds70.282%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,620 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 72 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mariapodenko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 72 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC632 views48 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, весь последний месяц год я так или иначе пишу о возвращении к себе. О выборе в собственную пользу. О праве на праздность - не как на безделье, а как на возможность остановиться и наконец услышать собственные мысли. О неудобных вопросах: а я вообще живу так, как хочу? И тут мне предложили продолжить это исследование - пройти шестидневную программу с подходящим названием «Иначе». Интересно не только названи

24🔥16👍8

27 Aug 2026, 04:41 UTC827 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Про «Непокой» Пошла на мультфильм, а вышла как после тревожного сна, который вроде бы состоял из полной ерунды, и при этом был подозрительно похож на жизнь. Двое друзей, Яша и Бернар, сворачивают с большой дороги и останавливаются на ночь в провинциальном отеле «Роза». Утром выясняется, что дороги больше нет. Уехать невозможно. В отеле живут человек-тигр, человек-пирамида, розовые зайцы и женщина с огромными глазам

17🤝3😐1

26 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC836 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10🔥1😍1

26 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC817 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4🔥2😍1

26 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC790 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

7🔥1😍1

26 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC946 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Только вернулась с Мальдивских островов и, кажется, поймала классический постотпускной синдром: телом уже в Москве, а мыслями всё ещё там, где вода, зелень, закаты и никто никуда не спешит. Так что теперь невольно ищу похожие вайбы в городе — места и маленькие сценарии, которые хотя бы ненадолго возвращают ощущение отпуска. Обожаю, когда прогулка без цели, спонтанный пикник на природе или закат с борта речного трамв

12🔥5👍4

25 Aug 2026, 05:22 UTC993 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Я, кстати, старательно все посты переношу в зеркальный Дневник в MAX для тех, кому удобно читать там. У канала в MAX уже 411 подписчиков, так что я точно не зря это делаю. Но мне больше нравится цифра 500 😌

7🔥7👌3👎1🗿1🤩1😍1

25 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC998 views31 reactionsread 28 August 2026

📈 Сколько стоит хорошее отношение к людям Four Seasons - частная компания, поэтому привычной подробной отчетности у нее нет. Мы не знаем точной выручки, чистой прибыли, денежного потока и дивидендов акционеров. Но известных цифр достаточно, чтобы понять: философия Айседора Шарпа превратилась во вполне материальный актив. Сегодня Four Seasons принадлежит трем акционерам: — 71,25% - Cascade Investment, инвестиционной

23🔥5👍2😍1

25 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC819 views26 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

🏨 Философия Four Seasons или роскошь - это не про мрамор. Практически любой отель можно скопировать. Заказать похожую мебель, купить такие же матрасы, нанять модного архитектора и поставить в ванной дорогую косметику. Гораздо труднее скопировать ощущение: меня здесь знают, обо мне позаботятся, мне не придется ни за кем бегать и ничего объяснять дважды. Именно это ощущение Айседор Шарп сделал главным продуктом Four

20👍5😍1

25 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC886 views49 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

📚📚📚📚📚 Человек, который придумал современную роскошь. Хотя вовсе не собирался. Долгий перелет не прошел даром. Ловите целую серию постов, про бренд, который стал синонимом роскоши, и человека, который его создал. Человек этот, Айседор Шарп, основатель Four Seasons, сразу вошёл в клуб #любимыемужчины. Он по всем характеристикам подходит - умный, смелый, с чувством юмора, высокий и спортивный. Ему, правда, 95 лет, но

31🔥13😍4👍1

24 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC944 views59 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Доброе московское утро! ☕️ В понедельник важно правильно выбрать масштаб: не список дел, а горизонт. Пусть на этой неделе будет место не только срочному, но и важному. И прекрасному. ДНЕВНИК В MAX

43😍9💯7

22 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC≈1,070 views36 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

28😍4🔥2🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @mariapodenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@mariapodenko edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

СберПремьер
@sberpremiernew · 107,591
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
FounderWoman
@FounderWoman · 45,046
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
Skolkovo School of Management
@skolkovo_channel · 43,164
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 28 August 2026
Первый инвестиционный
@am_first · 49,531
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дневник Марии Поденко” (@mariapodenko), 7,500 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mariapodenko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.