Channel
@podenkouletela
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,157subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003334927055 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @podenkouletela |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/podenkouletela |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 1,157 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 1,160 | -5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 1,165 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 1,166 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 1,168 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 1,171 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 1,177 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 1,175 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 1,177 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
119 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 68 | 57.1% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 33.6% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 7.56% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
План на день 1. Найти на малюсеньком острове магазин с настоящей, а не сувенирной одеждой. По настоящей цене. 2. Найти в нем два черных платья. Черных, на Мальдивах. 3. Устроить онлайн примерку с подругой 4. Вынести ей мозг, убеждая, что они очень разные. 5. Уйти, купив маску для волос. Upd. Вернулась за вторым
🔥6❤2😁2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Повторю любимые банки - в кружочке плохо видно. А вообще лучший SPF это, конечно, зонт - азиаты знают в этом толк. Причем зонты у них специальные, я себе купила один такой в Китае, но ходить с ним стесняюсь. Поэтому слушаю, что говорит мой косметолог. Это она меня лет 5 назад очень эффективно убедила, что солнце зло - чем больше я загорала, тем дороже становились процедуры 😅
❤5
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
❤8
🌅 А это к вопросу зачем сюда лететь. Это все фазы одного и того же заката, снятые на одной и той же террасе в течение одного часа. #мальдивылетом
🔥27❤21😍6
Гидросамолетики вылетают из старого терминала (но по сравнению с международным терминалом он не такой и старый). И милые они невозможно! Так же как и босоногие бортпроводники и пилоты в шортах )
🔥7❤6
Из хорошего логистического - приземлились в новом Velana Male Airport. На вид приятный и просторный, в обслуживании быстрый - паспортный контроль мы пролетели как в Дубае. Открылся, оказывается, в прошлом сентябре. Почитала - старый аэропорт был рассчитан на 1,5 млн туристов, новый на 7 млн, с запасом. Good.
❤6
Температура на Мальдивах прекрасна свой стабильностью - +28-30 круглый год, не больше и не меньше. Но если зимой здесь гарантировано солнце, то прилетая летом, ты принимаешь на себя риски штормов и дождей. Но так как риски неполучения шенгенской визы сейчас ещё выше, я решила снова рискнуть. Прошлым летом мне повезло и за неделю (на больший срок останавливаться не рекомендую) не было ни одного дождя. Посмотрим, что …
❤16😍3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @podenkouletela. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Поденко снова улетела ✈️” (@podenkouletela), 1,157 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podenkouletela.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.