Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 90 days, net -23,347. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 387,193–417,544 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 23:16
390,695
-625
3 Nov 2026, 22:20
391,320
-458
3 Nov 2026, 01:18
391,778
-481
2 Nov 2026, 03:57
392,259
-545
1 Nov 2026, 06:56
392,804
-651
31 Oct 2026, 07:46
393,455
-636
30 Oct 2026, 04:18
394,091
-636
29 Oct 2026, 02:29
394,727
-496
28 Oct 2026, 01:38
395,223
-644
27 Oct 2026, 00:51
395,867
-543
26 Oct 2026, 00:18
396,410
-481
25 Oct 2026, 03:38
396,891
-485
24 Oct 2026, 04:59
397,376
-584
23 Oct 2026, 02:41
397,960
-595
22 Oct 2026, 01:18
398,555
-706
20 Oct 2026, 21:09
399,261
-431
19 Oct 2026, 20:37
399,692
-355
18 Oct 2026, 17:00
400,047
-271
17 Oct 2026, 16:48
400,318
-177
16 Oct 2026, 19:47
400,495
first reading
Engagement
182 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.845%
avg views ÷ 390,695 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,300
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.316%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 182 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
182 (27 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
184,875
Reactions total
584
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 13:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,190
Videos
≈271
Links
≈3,490
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,131 reactions across 180 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
687
32.2%
❤
360
16.9%
🤡
287
13.5%
👍
279
13.1%
👏
185
8.68%
❤🔥
144
6.76%
🤨
103
4.83%
🗿
44
2.06%
🏆
15
0.704%
🐳
12
0.563%
🦄
9
0.422%
👾
6
0.282%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 182 of the 182 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 182 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 182 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptogram_web3. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 182 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 56 posts held from the last 30 days (5.36%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💬 В Solana заходит управляющая компания с активами на $1,1 трлн
Британская Schroders запустила в блокчейне Solana токенизированный фонд облигаций развивающихся рынков.
Теперь инвесторы смогут приобретать доли фонда в цифровом формате, используя возможности блокчейна для доступа к традиционным финансовым инструментам.
⚡️Криптограм 👾
Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
🔥 Американские рынки спровоцировали мощное ралли в крипте
После открытия торгов в акции США поступил почти $1 трлн капитала, что поддержало и криптовалютный рынок.
Bitcoin поднялся выше $81 000, Ethereum преодолел отметку $2 400, а большинство альткоинов перешли в зелёную зону.
⚡️Криптограм 👾
Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
✔️ Ethereum ускоряет подготовку к угрозе квантовых компьютеров
Исследователь Джастин Дрейк считает, что сеть сможет перейти на постквантовую криптографию уже к декабрю 2028 года — на год раньше первоначальных ориентиров.
Для этого потребуется три крупных обновления, а инструмент leanVM уже успешно прошёл формальную проверку.
⚡️Криптограм 👾
Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
🇺🇸 Крипторынок готовится к возможным резким движениям на фоне выборов в США
Промежуточные выборы в Конгресс могут стать дополнительным источником неопределённости для BTC, ETH и альткоинов.
Главный риск для трейдеров — повышенная волатильность: на фоне первых результатов возможны резкие движения цен в обе стороны и массовые ликвидации позиций с высоким кредитным плечом.
⚡️Криптограм 👾
Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
📊 Токенизированные акции растут, но большинство инвесторов держат копейки
Общий объём рынка достиг $3,2 млрд, однако медианный баланс среди 740 000 криптокошельков составляет всего $4,58.
Более 70% адресов владеют лишь одной токенизированной акцией, а половина стоимости всех активов сосредоточена в нескольких десятках крупных кошельков, многие из которых принадлежат биржам.
⚡️Криптограм 👾
Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
🔪 Криптоинвестора заставили передать биткоины под пытками
22-летний программист стал жертвой нападения после того, как в соцсетях демонстрировал дорогие автомобили и роскошные путешествия. Преступники похитили его и около пяти часов избивали в гараже, требуя доступ к криптокошелькам.
В итоге они получили 10,39 BTC, после чего оставили молодого человека связанным в лесу.
⚡️Криптограм 👾
Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
‼️ Южнокорейские власти усиливают защиту криптоактивов после взлома Binance
2 ноября финансовый регулятор FSC провёл экстренную встречу с представителями Upbit, Bithumb и других бирж.
Площадкам рекомендовали увеличить объём холодного хранения, усилить контроль доступа к внутренним системам и мониторинг транзакций, а также сформировать дополнительные резервы на случай атак.
⚡️Криптограм 👾
Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
💸 Пользователи Binance вывели $3,64 млрд за первые 10 часов
Биржа восстановила вывод криптовалют в 15 сетях. За первые 10 часов клиенты вывели $4,65 млрд и внесли обратно $1 млрд, в результате чистый отток составил $3,64 млрд — около 2,1% активов платформы.
⚡️Криптограм 👾
Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
👀 Теперь за перемещениями средств хакеров Binance можно следить в реальном времени
Arkham представила специальный дашборд для отслеживания украденных активов.
Пользователи могут наблюдать за кошельками злоумышленников, остатками альткоинов, а также объёмами стейблкоинов USDT и USDC, которые удалось заморозить Tether и Circle.
⚡️Криптограм 👾
Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
‼️ Под угрозой оказались пользователи сразу 12 криптоплатформ
Злоумышленники взломали сайты Flap, Kintsu, Pickle Finance, ApeX DeF и ещё нескольких проектов, используя вредоносный инструмент Step Drainer.
Он позволяет похищать средства через подключение кошелька и подписание опасных разрешений.
⚡️Криптограм 👾
Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
✔️ Binance готовит многомиллиардное возмещение пострадавшим от атаки
Биржа заявила, что выделила $6,34 млрд собственных средств для покрытия убытков пользователей: $5 млрд уже обеспечены в пострадавших токенах, а оставшиеся $1,34 млрд компания формирует через закупки на биржевом и OTC-рынках.
Binance обещает компенсировать все подтверждённые потери и после этого обновить Proof of Reserves.
⚡️Криптограм 👾
Биржи: Go…
☃️ Одна хакерская атака нанесла ущерб, сопоставимый с 12 годами взломов бирж
По одной из оценок, потери от взлома Binance достигли $6,3 млрд. Для сравнения: за 118 атак на централизованные криптобиржи в период с 2014 года хакеры суммарно похитили около $6,6 млрд.
⚡️Криптограм 👾
Биржи: GoSwap no KYC
🔥15❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 182 posts we hold for @cryptogram_web3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
VilarsoFREE |CryptoTrading ¹⁸⁺ @vilarsofree · 781,766 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
ТОНИ КРИПТАНА @TonyCryptoTrade · 81,162 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
BIRD TON @birdton · 768,972 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
ShortWorldsNews @MemeAler · 41,613 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Криптопаук 🎆 @CryptoPayk · 149,017 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Крипта Скруджа ⚡️ @crypta · 503,808 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
Сегодня @GoTodayGo · 122,293 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026
Ego Crypto @egocrypton · 408,840 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Дропы хомяка @hamsterdropru · 55,417 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
Юнит • Системщики Профита 🔥 Весь мир, как офис @demwinner · 182,247 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
Криптопатолог | Новости | Инвестиции @criptopatolog · 75,249 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
VideootWELVURA @tsitatyns · 176,143 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 August 2026
Очко Олексія Кулеби @shkilmaksym · 217,994 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Fomo @crypto_gst · 540,609 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
Newcoin - Возможности крипты @newcoinopss · 124,911 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Ladesov Crypto @eeusd · 1,067,997 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
INCRYPTO @incrypto_tg · 139,741 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
TechGPT [🅽 🅴 🆆 🆂] 🤖 @TechGPTNews · 262,892 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
Buddy Музыка @Buddy_music · 590,040 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 August 2026
Нейросети & Технологии | DeepTech @DeepTechNET · 282,097 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
FAMEZ @masezzzz · 61,244 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 21 August 2026
Азбука Криптана @Kripto_Azbuk · 280,589 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Крипто Стукач | Инвестиции | Заработок @crypto_stukach · 536,312 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
КриптоИнсайдер | CRYPTOIN @cryptoin · 43,655 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
www.okx.comregistrable domain: okx.com21 posts · 27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Криптограм 👾” (@cryptogram_web3), 390,695 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptogram_web3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.