Второй квартал 2026 года стал пятым подряд кварталом, когда инвестиции в российской экономике снижаются За первое полугодие инвестиции снизились на 9,9%, - и это худший результат за последнее десятилетие. К такому выводу пришли эксперты Института Столыпина, проанализировав ситуацию в российской экономике по итогам II квартала 2026 года». О чем говорят цифры В апреле–июне спад составил 6,6% год к году после рекордн…

Channel
Дерипаска
@olegderipaska
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
117,392subscribers
-1,441 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001130495604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @olegderipaska |
| Created | 18 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/olegderipaska |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 117,392 | -51 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 117,443 | -129 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 117,572 | -29 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 117,601 | -60 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 117,661 | -57 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 117,718 | -76 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 117,794 | -67 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:45 | 117,861 | -80 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 117,941 | -25 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 117,966 | -24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 117,990 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 118,006 | -26 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 118,032 | -47 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 118,079 | -78 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 118,157 | -29 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 118,186 | -39 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 118,225 | -172 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 118,397 | -31 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 118,428 | -42 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 118,470 | first reading |
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 37.0%
- avg views ÷ 117,392 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 43,500
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (23 May 2026 – 15 September 2026) |
| Views total | 391,300 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 21:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 8
- Videos
- 11
- Links
- 19
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 20m 41s
- Average length
- 2m 35s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Утверждение ОНДКП: момент истины для новой Думы 🔸Опубликованный Банком России проект Основных направлений единой государственной денежно-кредитной политики (ОНДКП) на 2027-2029 годы вызывает много вопросов. Заложенные в нем параметры - систематическое недостижение цели по инфляции, завышенная ключевая ставка, пересмотр прогнозов по ВВП в сторону снижения - выглядят как признание поражения в борьбе за ценовую стабиль…
План ЦБ на 3 года вызвал у многих экономистов недоумение Совершенно прямо в лице зампреда Центробанка на основе опубликованных ранее «Основных направлений денежно-кредитной политики (ДКП) на период с 2027 по 2029 годы» фактически была предложена стратегия, которая предлагает «сузить талию» вместо того, чтобы скроить для экономики костюм пошире. Основное – сохранить действующую ДКП без изменений, а главной и фактиче…
https://www.ng.ru/economics/2026-09-01/1_4_9572_money.html
Да, в нашем финансовом мегарегуляторе (ЦБ РФ) отдельные сотрудники, похоже, очень беззаботно отнеслись к надвигающемуся спаду инвестиций в основной капитал. А это может свести на нет все усилия российского бизнеса (который находится под сумасшедшим санкционным давлением) и Правительства по восстановлению экономического роста до уровня не ниже 6% для достижения национальных целей, установленных указами президента. h…
Ожидания и инфляция: что не так с логикой ЦБ 🔸Зампред ЦБ А. Заботкин в интервью РБК предложил нам, по сути, так рассуждать о денежно-кредитной политике: люди долго помнят плохое, поэтому после пяти лет высокой инфляции нужен длительный период роста цен вблизи 4%. Получается, что инфляция снизится только когда все забудут о том, какая высокая инфляция у нас была в прошлом. Выглядит все это так, что цель ДКП – это …
Да, видимо, не зря многие аналитики предсказывают грядущую эскалацию в космосе. Мировая экономика потеряет триллионы долларов... https://www.ft.com/content/7ee0ae41-db32-453d-ac30-80660ee9b60f
https://youtu.be/crUTqPD4_N4
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @olegderipaska. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@derepaska · 614 postsПогрязший во фьючерсах
@falleninfutures · 725 postsПроПолитику
@propolitikum · 33 posts𝚃𝙴𝚉𝙸𝚂 𝙿𝙾𝚂𝚃
@TEZISPOST · 92 postsКрАЗ Настоящий
@therealkraz · 82 postsЭльдар Латыпов
@Latypov12 · 11 postПищальников
@Pishchalnikovdmitriy · 8691 postОвощи тоже будут мясо...
@PoliticalVegetables · 231 postТЕЗИСЫ об Экономике и Промышленности
@PromProizvodstvo · 91 postАнклдед, отвечай!
@Sychtv · 4,0791 postВандербильдиха
@Vanderbildiha · 31 postЦИЭТ (Центр изучения экологических трансформаций)
@ciet_ru · 651 post«УгольИнвест»
@coalrf · 291 postРазмышления местного. Василий Мартовский.
@iluziyvebor · 311 postКузнецов не забудет
@kuznezabudet · 961 postМамкин инвестор
@mominvest · 311 postLost in LA
@ndl3441 · 2191 postНЕХАЙМ
@neshaim · 431 postПолипон
@poliponchik · 71 postЯ лох
@polloxxx · 31 postРекрутолоджи | Рекрутинг и карьера без BDSMa
@recruitology · 641 postRes Publica
@respublicahse · 131 postRodk_in76
@rodk_in76 · 11 postghfghfgh
@rusmusor · 11 postСокольский
@sokolskihutor · 7931 postАрхитектор сквотов
@vtraktovenko · 91 postКанал Беспощадный пиарщик(короткие видео о событиях в мире иногда о прекрасном)🇷🇺🇺🇦🇬🇧🇺🇸♥️
@zima1277 · 241 postКровожадный Сталин
@zloyStalin · 651 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@medialogia · 13,0256 postsФинансовый климат
@financial_climate · 2,1585 postsУлыбаемся & Машем
@afric_ylbIbka · 11,2873 postsФинансы РФ | Разборы
@finrfrazbor · 2,1603 postsHappyMerryStalinStrait
@happy_merry_stalin_strait · 43 postsРусский Контекст
@RusskiyKontext · 2,0653 postsЦифры власти
@power_numbers · 2,3882 postsЧёрный Лебедь
@swaneconomy · 135,5622 posts5 копеек
@Vkopeek · 12 postsАхмат Хасанов / Политика, международные отношения, аналитика / 🇷🇺
@AkhmatKhasanov · 1211 postДетский научный лагерь "Лобачевский"
@ano_dnll · 8191 postРаньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,6931 postДеньги и смыслы
@dengismysly · 2,4241 postЕнисейский Сибиряк
@eniseysiberia · 2511 postМир и Война
@geopolist · 841 postМаксим Ильяхов (Главред)
@glvrdru · 69,5351 postЗаголовки
@investies · 821 postДжо в тумане
@joethedark · 51 postЛамповый Преемник
@lamp_priemnik · 10,9671 postМиллиардеры
@milliardery_rus · 5251 postНевольные каменщики
@nonmason · 1911 postOZMAN
@ozmanofficial · 53,5301 postPavel Obrero
@pavelobrero · 411 postПолиттролль
@politrolling · 1541 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693#1
@banksta · 438,140#2
@ejdailyru · 649,498#3
@bloodysx · 1,158,879#4
@temalebedev · 968,245#5
@rbc_news · 905,528#6
@rezident_ua · 937,082#7
@dimsmirnov175 · 332,880#8
@auantonov · 321,690#9
@markettwits · 336,496#10
@infantmilitario · 277,659#11
@legitimniy · 1,029,288#12
@bankrollo · 454,915#13
@bponline · 111,013#14
@kommersant · 294,027#15
@meduzalive · 1,121,201#16
@bitkogan · 259,899#17
@imnotbozhena · 504,326#18
@moscowmap · 2,674,200#19
@obrazbuduschego2 · 165,087#20
@finpizdec · 54,899#21
@olegtsarov · 403,249#22
@tass_agency · 567,568#23
@kashinguru · 75,441#24
@wargonzo · 745,026#25
@russianmacro · 102,810#26
@crimsondigest · 141,567#27
@cbrstocks · 117,627#28
@AK47pfl · 115,716#29
@razborpoletoveconomy · 4,643#30
@botcharov · 210,518#31
@istrkalkglk · 122,253#32
@stalin_gulag · 300,961#33
@headlines_for_traders · 115,317#34
@nonetutto · 136,217#35
@centralbank_russia · 244,199#36
@news_kremlin · 282,421#37
@stolypin2 · 35,827#38
@tolk_tolk · 126,019#39
@groks · 43,050#40
@proeconomics · 68,378#41
@asupersharij · 1,700,527#42
@mash · 3,096,804#43
@mig41 · 480,324#44
@medvedev_telegram · 1,700,869#45
@yurasumy · 2,672,095#46
@bazabazon · 1,535,150#47
@boris_rozhin · 747,495#48
@aavst2022 · 176,254#49
@russicaru · 430,325#50
@bomber_fighter · 527,852#51
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,141#52
@kontext_channel · 838,100#53
@luka_ebkov · 431,305#54
@zerada1 · 425,490#55
@rvvoenkor · 1,459,285#56
@readovkanews · 2,012,262#57
@vysokygovorit · 488,324#58
@sncmag · 301,518#59
@prbezposhady · 151,786#60
@minaevlife · 318,729#61
@dvachannel · 938,773#62
@aleksandr_skif · 315,688#63
@yurydud · 864,661#64
@insect_life · 192,024#65
@victorstepanych · 156,134#66
@russ_orientalist · 130,371#67
@spydell_finance · 131,481#68
@forbesrussia · 235,528#69
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005#70
@TuckerCarlsonNetwork · 208,241#71
@shot_shot · 1,264,301#72
@oper_goblin · 494,224#73
@rkadyrov_95 · 2,124,406#74
@thebell_io · 105,282#75
@brieflyru · 100,613#76
@solovievlive · 1,101,856#77
@sladkov_plus · 705,173#78
@bbcrussian · 387,062#79
@sashakots · 474,029#80
@shuohuaxia · 144,665#81
@margaritasimonyan · 512,145#82
@voenacher · 664,441#83
@strelets_molodec · 355,464#84
@O_Arestovich_official · 241,702#85
@tatlersheroine · 100,724#86
@Alexey_Pivo_varov · 306,315#87
@epoddubny · 575,703#88
@addmeto · 71,835#89
@pezduzalive · 372,470#90
@politjoystic · 250,578#91
@ksbchk · 372,627#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@stolypin2 · 35,827
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
@blablanomika · 45,892
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
@davydovin · 1,889,362
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
@crimsondigest · 141,567
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@metodi4ka · 87,876
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
@TuckerCarlsonNetwork · 208,241
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
@Coala_russia · 28,661
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
@pozneronline · 44,617
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
@TotSamyiKogan · 54,432
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
@Burovaia · 41,132
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
@AbzalovD · 43,814
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
@economikal · 118,445
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
@tlgdoc · 29,450
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
@rbc_pro · 27,593
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
@gazmyaso · 47,579
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
@proeconomics · 68,378
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
@oooavirta · 56,312
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@glazieview · 46,384
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
@russianmacro · 102,810
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
@bitkogan · 259,899
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
@market_hand · 30,537
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
@ssluchay · 25,847
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
@nomerok777 · 25,886
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
@pushkins_life · 26,107
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 74 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Oleg Deripaska |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian businessman |
| X / Twitter | @deripaskaoleg |
| Official site | https://deripaska.com/ |
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Hacker News
This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дерипаска” (@olegderipaska), 117,392 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olegderipaska.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.