File, posted without a caption

Channel
Академик для думающих людей
@glazieview
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
46,324subscribers
-123 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001182028672 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @glazieview |
| Created | 2 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/glazieview |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 46,324 | -10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:26 | 46,334 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:54 | 46,339 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 46,342 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 46,354 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 46,364 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 46,366 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 46,372 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 46,367 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 46,374 | +70 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 46,304 | -15 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 46,319 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 46,325 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 46,324 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 46,330 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 46,333 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 46,345 | -14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 46,359 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 46,364 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 46,371 | first reading |
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.1%
- avg views ÷ 46,324 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,520
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (12 July 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 123,840 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 22:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,750
- Videos
- ≈368
- Links
- ≈2,960
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Публикуем краткий вариант доклада на совместном заседании Научно-экспертного Совета ВЭО и Научного Совета РАН 26 августа с.г.
Начинающаяся в Бишкеке встреча глав государств ШОС происходит вскоре после введения Администрацией США «невиданных» санкций против Ирана. Глава США прямо угрожает отключить от долларовой системы все страны, сотрудничающие с Ираном. Если для России связь с долларовой системой сохраняется только руководством ЦБ, которое зачем-то продолжает котировать эту валюту и номинировать в ней курс рубля, то другим государствам ШО…
Совместное заседание Научно-экспертного Совета Вольного экономического общества и Научного Совета РАН по комплексным проблемам евразийской экономической интеграции, модернизации, конкурентоспособности и устойчивому развитию 26 августа в Москве в Конгресс-холле ВЭО России прошло совместное заседание Научного совета РАН и Научно-экспертного совета Вольного экономического общества России (старейшая экспертная организац…
Читателям канала «Академик для думающих людей» Информируем вас об изменении концепции канала. С этого момента он становится средством информации о деятельности Научного совета РАН по комплексным проблемам евразийской экономической интеграции, модернизации, конкурентоспособности и устойчивому развитию,Научно-экспертного совета Вольного экономического общества России и Научно-экспертного совета при Постоянном Комитете…
File, posted without a caption
В очередной записке ведущего американского аналитика Д,Лифшульца раскрывается техника манипулирования ценами на нефть на мировом рынке, а также факторы повышения цен на нефть вследствие войны в заливе. Получается, что из-за неверных ценовых ориентиров, формирующихся на манипулируемом «бумажном» рынке фьючерсов и опционов, Россия экспортирует нефть вдвое дешевле цены на реально потребляемую нефть, а гигантская маржа д…
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Публикуем полный текст, ранее выложенный в цикле статей под этим же названием
File, posted without a caption
Ведущий американский аналитик Лифщульц пересмотрел прогноз краха мировой финансово-торговой системы в связи с ростом цен на нефть из за войны в Заливе, сдвинув его на полгода
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @glazieview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@fasie21 · 462 postsLomonosov Research - о поиске своего места в науке
@lomonosov_research · 752 postsАлександр Саверский
@alexander_saversky · 2,1381 postChronicles of Covidla
@covidlarus · 81 postДОКТОРЧТОСОМНОЙ
@doktor4toSomnoy · 361 postdr_korsakova
@dr_korsakova · 1731 postGeopolitics & Empire
@GeopoliticsAndEmpire · 12,6221 postГлазьев экономика
@Gluazev · 7861 postКлючевые детали в мировой политике
@invisiblespiral · 681 postИСКРА.БЕЗ ПРОБЛЕМ.
@iskrabezproblem · 241 postВидео Топор Война Крипта Москва Новости 18+
@novostigaza · 201 postО политике с любовью.
@papinagotovka · 431 postНа заре туманной Юности
@razvitieujnosti · 1241 postСводки частной разведки
@rtechnocom · 18,5091 postРУССТРАТ
@russtrat · 108,6411 postссылки
@SmartTalk1 · 11 postПошла черемуха
@vremevpered · 461 postДед МаZай и яйца
@zloydedmazay · 831 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@khazinml · 245,204#1
@spydell_finance · 130,654#2
@rezident_ua · 925,034#3
@shuohuaxia · 144,916#4
@asupersharij · 1,678,485#5
@russicaru · 426,443#6
@delyagin · 126,732#7
@dimsmirnov175 · 323,098#8
@oper_goblin · 495,114#9
@zakharprilepin · 225,627#10
@legitimniy · 1,064,035#11
@obrazbuduschego2 · 165,208#12
@clubpravda · 89,255#13
@arktida_rus · 2,207#14
@dimonundmir · 208,230#15
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 444,576#16
@crystal_book · 59,125#17
@mardanaka · 203,326#18
@ukr_2025_ru · 493,989#19
@Kdvinsky · 29,698#20
@botcharov · 210,920#21
@Agdchan · 98,240#22
@rbc_news · 900,838#23
@inosmichannel · 144,809#24
@nonetutto · 132,323#25
@rus_demiurge · 113,393#26
@DDrobnitski · 80,007#27
@swaneconomy · 134,952#28
@vv_volodin · 1,305,543#29
@nstarikovru · 86,148#30
@montyan2 · 303,352#31
@olegderipaska · 117,794#32
@olegtsarov · 403,993#33
@yurasumy · 2,668,995#34
@bbbreaking · 1,971,750#35
@boris_rozhin · 739,135#36
@ejdailyru · 651,038#37
@solovievlive · 1,094,116#38
@banksta · 437,250#39
@dva_majors · 1,160,732#40
@readovkanews · 2,014,152#41
@mash · 3,105,206#42
@vysokygovorit · 488,673#43
@mig41 · 472,532#44
@politjoystic · 250,574#45
@bomber_fighter · 517,707#46
@rvvoenkor · 1,461,107#47
@medvedev_telegram · 1,705,521#48
@sladkov_plus · 697,058#49
@gevorgyankarine · 110,191#50
@zerada1 · 425,405#51
@victorstepanych · 156,071#52
@wargonzo · 746,644#53
@aleksandr_skif · 316,448#54
@rogozin_do · 92,091#55
@infantmilitario · 277,848#56
@sashakots · 474,436#57
@MIrvMomente · 72,710#58
@mikle1on · 490,090#59
@epoddubny · 570,758#60
@tass_agency · 567,605#61
@geonrgru · 138,656#62
@barantchik · 90,345#63
@govoritfursov · 130,669#64
@rkadyrov_95 · 2,155,714#65
@logikamarkova · 53,847#66
@voenkorKotenok · 313,814#67
@milinfolive · 615,427#68
@MedvedevVesti · 183,770#69
@nationaldef · 116,218#70
@voenacher · 666,261#71
@rusengineer · 124,216#72
@notes_veterans · 277,574#73
@vizioner_rf · 80,990#74
@mariavladimirovnazakharova · 465,204#75
@geostrategrus · 124,983#76
@OpenUkraine · 180,945#77
@belarusian_silovik · 450,922#78
@mod_russia · 648,665#79
@warhistoryalconafter · 482,677#80
@Alekhin_Telega · 117,987#81
@margaritasimonyan · 513,881#82
@imnotbozhena · 504,118#83
@nikitabsg · 391,529#84
@chadayevru · 101,910#85
@strelkovii · 368,083#86
@obshina_ru · 595,564#87
@NeoficialniyBeZsonoV · 245,514#88
@brieflyru · 100,565#89
@news_kremlin · 282,990#90
@hazinOpen · 49,809#91
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@govoritfursov · 130,669
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
@delyagin · 126,732
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
@mariashukshina · 153,188
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
@fursov_andrey · 46,951
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
“…/t.me/peresleginserg/902. Один из анализов Переслегина хвалил [[Сергей Глазьев]]https://t.me/glazieview/8480 https://t.me/glazieview/8481…”
read 23 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Академик для думающих людей” (@glazieview), 46,324 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glazieview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.