Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Geopolitics & Empire

Channel

Geopolitics & Empire

@GeopoliticsAndEmpire

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,494subscribers

-221 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001391166244
TypeChannel
Username@GeopoliticsAndEmpire
DescriptionTelegram Channel of the Geopolitics & Empire Podcast: https://geopoliticsandempire.com Geopolitics & Empire Telegram Group: https://t.me/GeopoliticsAndEmpireBackChannel
Created4 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/GeopoliticsAndEmpire

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@GeopoliticsAndEmpire/67275 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 23:44 UTC@theologyandgeopolitics/164867 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC1.0019 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@theologyandgeopolitics6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0016 hoursthis entry (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @GeopoliticsAndEmpire — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

12,49212,73312,612.56 August 2026 — 12,715 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,714 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,709 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,733 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,704 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,702 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,703 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,697 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,689 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,685 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,676 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,674 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,672 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,666 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,663 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,662 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,658 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,655 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,650 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,649 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,641 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,635 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,632 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,629 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,627 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,622 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,598 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,587 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,584 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,580 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,576 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,571 subscribers26 September 2026 — 12,556 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,532 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,519 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,521 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,520 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,517 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,515 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,513 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,508 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,510 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,506 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,511 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,509 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,511 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,506 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,503 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,494 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,492 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,493 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,494 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,495 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,498 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,494 subscribers12,4946 August 20266 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 92 days, net -221. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,456–12,769 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 12:1512,494-4
5 Nov 2026, 10:1112,498+3
3 Nov 2026, 09:1912,495+1
2 Nov 2026, 12:4712,494+1
31 Oct 2026, 10:3612,493+1
30 Oct 2026, 12:3012,492-2
28 Oct 2026, 16:0712,494-9
27 Oct 2026, 14:1812,503-3
26 Oct 2026, 16:0112,506-5
25 Oct 2026, 15:0512,511+2
24 Oct 2026, 12:1612,509-2
23 Oct 2026, 09:2712,511+5
22 Oct 2026, 10:1112,506-4
21 Oct 2026, 02:4712,510+2
20 Oct 2026, 02:1812,508-5
18 Oct 2026, 23:0612,513-2
17 Oct 2026, 19:5012,515-2
16 Oct 2026, 21:1612,517-3
15 Oct 2026, 20:0912,520-1
14 Oct 2026, 17:0612,521first reading

Engagement

309 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.77%
avg views ÷ 12,494 subscribers
Avg views / post
596
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 309 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 60 of 64 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held309 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total38,163
Reactions total438
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 19:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈21,400
Videos
≈12,800
Links
≈41,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 03m
Average length
2m 52s

Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,970 reactions across 276 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤29815.1%
💯27714.1%
👍1969.95%
🤬1628.22%
🔥1035.23%
😁1025.18%
🤡995.03%
🤣924.67%
💩824.16%
🤮723.65%
🖕673.40%
😈422.13%
👎361.83%
🤯351.78%
👀311.57%
🤔301.52%
🏆241.22%
👌231.17%
🤪231.17%
😴221.12%
31 further kinds1547.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 291 of the 309 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,037 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 309 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 64 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 14:58 UTC401 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👌9🤣4

6 Nov 2026, 14:58 UTC323 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

The 2026 “blue wave” was always the intended (orchestrated) outcome, just as 2024’s “red MAGA wave” was also. Neither was organic. Both are deliberate phases of a much larger, overarching PsyOp… The political pendulum’s constant swing from one extreme to the other is not natural, it is entirely by design IMO: this is all about doing away with left and right, and ultimately creating a centrist political party that w…

👍5💯1

6 Nov 2026, 14:57 UTC308 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Politics is entirely scripted and rigged. Our vote does not count. If our vote truly made a legitimate difference, we would not be allowed to cast one! By voting, an individual is simply consenting to be ruled over Voting and (s)elections are an enslavement mechanisms designed to create the illusion of “democracy” and “choice”, while voters remain yoked to the uniparty system All politicians (actors) work for the s…

❤3💯3

5 Nov 2026, 04:50 UTC807 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @AnarchismemesDAOPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

👍3🔥2👎1💩1🕊1🤡1🥴1

5 Nov 2026, 03:43 UTC839 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @voxday_official

To Hell with Republicans I have never been prouder to be able to say that I am not, and have never been, a Republican. Or, for that matter, a conservative. Now, I have no doubt that the Democrats cheated, scammed, and cast fraudulent votes like they always do. They are openly evil and beneath contempt. But the Republicans, as […] https://voxday.net/2026/11/05/to-hell-with-republicans/

👍4👎1🤡1🤷‍♂1😴1

5 Nov 2026, 02:08 UTC776 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @jeffdotpro

https://jeff.pro/the-brain-computer-interface-bci-may-be-the-mark-of-the-beast

🔥2👀1

5 Nov 2026, 02:04 UTC726 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @CounterPropagandazPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

💯9❤‍🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 02:01 UTC763 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Sign me up! https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/chinese-company-develops-1000-ai-powered-laser-system-kill-mosquitoes

🤬1🆒1

5 Nov 2026, 02:00 UTC663 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @Radio_Far_Side

As we've often noted on the Far Side, NGOs are weaponized corporations funded by global slush funds: https://rt-english.com/russia/648208-rt-examines-decolonization-russia/

😈4👍1

5 Nov 2026, 01:49 UTC737 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Welcome to the future. https://archive.ph/ovUne

🤬6

5 Nov 2026, 00:55 UTC662 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @davidavocadowolfePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

❤3🤣1🤷‍♂1

Showing the 12 most recent of 309 posts we hold for @GeopoliticsAndEmpire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Theology & Geopolitics
@theologyandgeopolitics · 6,127
12 posts
𝚁𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚁𝚊𝚋𝚋𝚒𝚝 𝙷𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚜
@Revelations_and_Rabbit_Holes · 24,572
7 posts
Borderless
@Borderlessblog · 67
3 posts
AshTruthBrew
@AshTruthBrew · 122
2 posts
The Daily Zi-Op
@antiwarnews · 91
2 posts
#TBOT: Take Back Our Tech
@takebackourtech · 10,637
2 posts
Ytringsforum
@ytringsforum · 9
2 posts
Elastic Resistance
@ElasticResistance · 15
1 post
Jewish Truth Archive
@JewTruthArchive · 4,772
1 post
NatExpress
@Nat_Express · 28
1 post
OSINT
@OSINT_1 · 595
1 post
Open Minds Inc. 💡
@OpenMindsInc · 595
1 post
BIG PICTURE | WW3.Film.com with James Patrick (Planet Lockdown)
@PlanetLockdown · 4,339
1 post
Repaire de M . K
@Repaire_k · 9,255
1 post
Slain's Library
@SlainPosts · 4
1 post
The Great Awakening, not Q
@TheGreatAwakening999 · 145
1 post
adapt2030
@adapt2030 · 3,637
1 post
Conscious Spaces
@consciousspaces · 48
1 post
Deep Dives: bioweapons, great reset, recession | no refunds edition
@cv19reset · 282
1 post
Defending Freedom
@defending_freedom · 21
1 post
DELIA News
@delianews · 176
1 post
ENGINEERED PANDEMIC
@engineeredpandemic · 5
1 post
Iain Davis
@iaindavis · 1,637
1 post
See the light
@letter2you · 6
1 post
𝕸𝖚𝖓𝖊𝖓𝖊 𝕾𝖕𝖊𝖆𝖐𝖘
@munenespeaks · 197
1 post
Revisionismo y Geopolítica
@revisionismoygeopoliticaoficial · 1,704
1 post
Scientists for Health Freedom
@scientistsforhealthfreedom · 521
1 post
Social Justice Azania
@socialjusticeazania · 116
1 post
Ssussdriad
@ssussdriad · 8
1 post
Still in the Storm
@stillinthestorm · 920
1 post
Taoist Professor
@taoistprofessor_schoolworldorder · 106
1 post
Unlimited Hangout
@unlimitedhangout · 13,579
1 post
Vault of Secrets - Unpopular History
@vaultofsecrets · 18,303
1 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Republishes 62 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

Ice Age Farmer
@iceagefarmer · 66,564
14 posts
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 317,208
13 posts
weird shit
@weirdiswise · 2,363
8 posts
The Conspiracy Hole
@TheConspiracyHole · 104,386
7 posts
NavigatingTheLies
@navigatingthelies · 12,305
7 posts
David Avocado Wolfe
@davidavocadowolfe · 101,587
6 posts
𝙨𝙣𝙚𝙠 𝙥𝙞𝙩 - AUTUMN COZY POSTING
@snekpit23 · 3,346
6 posts
🔴 Blazing Press 🔴 BP NEWS
@trumpetnews1 · 19,181
6 posts
NoGoolag
@NoGoolag · 4,773
5 posts
Wikispooks.com - A Wikipedia of deep politics
@Wikispooks1 · 849
5 posts
Derrick Broze's Daily News
@dbrozenews · 7,328
5 posts
HEYS REVIEWS
@HEYSREVIEWS · 444
4 posts
cryptogon
@cryptogon_feed · 288
4 posts
BIG PICTURE | WW3.Film.com with James Patrick (Planet Lockdown)
@PlanetLockdown · 4,339
3 posts
RadioFarSide
@Radio_Far_Side · 213
3 posts
𝚁𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚁𝚊𝚋𝚋𝚒𝚝 𝙷𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚜
@Revelations_and_Rabbit_Holes · 24,572
3 posts
Information Liberation
@informationliberation · 5,465
3 posts
Our High Calling
@our_high_calling · 2,811
3 posts
RISE
@roundsaturnseye · 863
3 posts
AM's Garden Sanctuary 🌸
@AMsGardenSanctuary · 1,635
2 posts
Filling Our Cups With Hope
@FillingOurCupsWithHope · 1,116
2 posts
Maryann Gebauer
@MaryannGebauerChannel · 2,422
2 posts
Ivana Đirlić Šindija NE (psihološkoj) manipulaciji
@NEpsihomanipulaciji44 · 1,267
2 posts
The Daily Psyop
@PsyopDaily · 3,477
2 posts
The Macro Butler
@TheMacroButlerSubstack · 463
2 posts
Expat Money®
@expatmoney · 969
2 posts
LifeSiteNews
@lifesitetelegram · 8,521
2 posts
OffGuardian (official)
@offguardian · 8,543
2 posts
Stonetoss
@stone_toss · 20,891
2 posts
#FREEPARISTINE
@volmemes · 15,122
2 posts
Anarchismemes DAO
@AnarchismemesDAO · 187
1 post
Bones' Tech Garage
@BonesTechGarage · 2,885
1 post
☀️Conscious Health☀️
@ConsciousHealthOfficial · 7,594
1 post
The Few, The Proud
@CounterPropagandaz · 662
1 post
Dirt Road Discussions
@DirtRoadDiscussion · 131,068
1 post
Disidente incontrolado
@Disidenteincontrolado · 13,077
1 post
ESFERA TERRA⚡️
@ESFERATERRA · 241
1 post
Fundamental Christianity
@FundamentalChristianity · 9,511
1 post
Jewish Truth Archive
@JewTruthArchive · 4,772
1 post
Laura Ru
@LauraRuHK · 15,507
1 post
MARK37.COM
@MARK37public · 1,033
1 post
ᴍᴇᴏᴡᴅʏ🤠
@MeowdySir · 1,867
1 post
BubbaNews
@bubbanews · 19,119
1 post
Death to the World
@deathtotheworldofficial · 2,387
1 post
Bible
@eng_bible · 590
1 post
Академик для думающих людей
@glazieview · 46,034
1 post
𝕀𝕟 𝕄𝕒𝕘𝕟𝕒 𝔼𝕩𝕔𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠
@inmagnaexcitatio · 19,239
1 post
Jeffrey Peterson - jeff.pro
@jeffdotpro · 23,757
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Exposé News (Official)
@dailyexpose · 27,519
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Health Ranger
@RealHealthRanger · 62,515
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
SSGEOS
@ssgeosurvey · 19,713
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 29 September 2026
Xoaquin Flores - New Resistance
@NewResistance · 28,425
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
Robin Monotti
@robinmg · 66,964
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
The Crowhouse
@thecrowhouseoffical · 29,237
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
Eurasia & Multipolarity
@EurasianChoice · 23,702
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
REALCHRISSKY
@realchrissky · 31,594
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
Dr. Simon
@goddek · 38,391
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
David Avocado Wolfe
@davidavocadowolfe · 101,587
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
Covid Vaccine Injuries
@covid_vaccine_injuries · 24,641
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
Real World News
@RealWorldNewsChannel · 24,854
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 September 2026
David Icke Official Telegram
@davidickeofficial · 42,306
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
Lee Merritt MD: FreedomDoc1
@FreedomDoc1 · 24,351
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
Independent Medical Alliance
@IMA_Health · 31,012
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
COVID-19 Up
@COVID19Up · 25,522
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
Zeee Media 🎙
@zeeemedia · 53,700
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
INFOWARS.COM 🚫🚫🚫
@infowarslive · 22,222
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel
@DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 25,917
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
World Doctors Alliance
@worlddoctorsalliance · 74,878
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox · 118,816
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon
@DrMikeYeadon · 26,881
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 September 2026
Dr. Tenpenny
@DrTenpenny · 87,635
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
Children’s Health Defense
@childrenshd · 52,477
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Geopolitics & Empire” (@GeopoliticsAndEmpire), 12,494 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GeopoliticsAndEmpire.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.