This is saying something. In spite of all the disparity and fighting, this is the Wagner Group meme “The fuel of War. Snickers, Red Bull, etc.

Channel
Lee Merritt MD: FreedomDoc1
@FreedomDoc1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,448subscribers
-262 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001154906575 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FreedomDoc1 |
| Description | Will you choose comfort? Or will you fight against evil? Be ungovernable. |
| Created | 30 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 40 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FreedomDoc1 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 24,448 | -4 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 23:50 | 24,452 | -12 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 16:41 | 24,464 | -14 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 24,478 | -28 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 24,506 | -28 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 24,534 | -6 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 24,540 | -11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 24,551 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 24,557 | -18 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 24,575 | -13 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 24,588 | +5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 24,583 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 24,591 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:46 | 24,596 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 24,603 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 24,605 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 24,610 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 24,617 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 24,615 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 24,613 | first reading |
Engagement
358 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.2%
- avg views ÷ 24,448 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,500
- 148 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.06%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 148
- of 358 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 140 of 148 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 358 (2 August 2026 – 15 October 2026) |
| Views total | 369,424 |
| Reactions total | 7,394 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Oct 2026, 03:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,820
- Videos
- ≈4,610
- Links
- ≈5,880
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 11m
- Average length
- 1m 04s
Measured directly from 68 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19,669 reactions across 334 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,783 | 19.2% | |
| 👍 | 3,206 | 16.3% | |
| 💯 | 2,241 | 11.4% | |
| 🔥 | 1,835 | 9.33% | |
| 🙏 | 1,540 | 7.83% | |
| 👏 | 1,015 | 5.16% | |
| 😈 | 780 | 3.97% | |
| 🤔 | 673 | 3.42% | |
| 🥰 | 622 | 3.16% | |
| 🤬 | 580 | 2.95% | |
| 😡 | 436 | 2.22% | |
| 😱 | 358 | 1.82% | |
| 😁 | 324 | 1.65% | |
| 🤣 | 319 | 1.62% | |
| 👀 | 285 | 1.45% | |
| 🤡 | 267 | 1.36% | |
| 🤮 | 240 | 1.22% | |
| 🤯 | 218 | 1.11% | |
| 🎉 | 151 | 0.768% | |
| ⚡ | 127 | 0.646% | |
| 35 further kinds | 669 | 3.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 347 of the 358 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,243 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 358 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
@DoomsdayTimeAnomalies
🔥5
Video, posted without a caption
👍3
On February 15, 2025, Hollywood actress elitist Jennifer Garner left many of her fans disturbed after uploading a video of herself reading a book titled Secret Pizza Party to children at a Save the Children event, which is currently under investigation for child sex trafficking. The book Secret Pizza Party instructs children to keep secrets. On October 8, 2024, BBC reported Police in Guatemala raided five regional o…
🔥4😈4
They’ve been doing this for years and nobody wanted to believe in “Pizzagate” or the FBI pedophile symbols. They aren’t hiding. It’s disgusting.
https://x.com/mrpool_qq/status/2110123785378558008?s=42
❤2
"ThEy JuSt WaNt A bEtTeR eDuCaTiOn" 🔥🔥🔥 Join @GodlyEndTimeTruthChat @GodlyEndTimeTruth @TraditionalBritainGroup
😈30👎13💩11🥴7🤪5❤2🤬2⚡1
In 1996, Smith, Jones and Williams were the most common surnames among babies born across England and Wales. Taylor, Brown, Davies, Evans, Thomas, Johnson and Wilson round up the top 10. Top 10 now: Smith, Khan, Ahmed, Ali, Jones, Hussain, Singh, Williams, Patel and Kaur. 👹🤬👹🤬 ALL BY DESIGN ALL GOING ACCORDING TO THEIR PLAN. THEY HAVE IMPORTED OUR REPLACEMENTS. DIVERSITY EQUALS WHITE GENOCIDE. 🤬👹🤬👹 🔥🔥🔥 Join @G…
😈46💯12🔥7🙏7❤2😁1
IT'S OFFICIAL: Scott Bessent's Treasury Department "is imposing a $1.2 BILLION fine on Bank of America for allegedly violating anti-money laundering laws and sanctions" Bank of America ADMITTED it willfully broke federal anti-money laundering law. Treasury says the bank failed to report more than $5 BILLION in suspicious transactions on time More than $1 billion of that was tied to Chinese 🇨🇳🏴☠️🐍🐲money-laundering…
👏40👍10🔥7❤4💯3
I need one of these guys…
😁27💯14
https://x.com/jeffreytucker/status/2109704910342402232?s=52
🤬68🔥10🤯9🥴2❤1🤨1🤮1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤34👍22🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 358 posts we hold for @FreedomDoc1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@FreedomDoc1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 5 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 5 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@VseWeda · 13,0974 postsAfter Hours With Dr. Sigoloff
@afterhourswithdrsigoloff · 6292 posts🇨🇦 CHD CANADA 🇨🇦
@CHDCanada · 4951 postLaw Friends
@FriendsInLaw · 2431 postGrand Theft World
@GrandTheftWorld · 4261 postICONS(INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY OF NATURAL SOVEREIGNS)
@ICONS2021 · 24,2811 postShedding Light
@earthdeclassified · 151 postProЗдоровье
@human_healing · 11 postLIES and BS vs TRUTH
@liesbsTRUTH · 281 postPC Patriot
@pc_patriot1 postChina Virus - Covid Vaccine - Masks ~ T
@wuhanvirus_covid19 · 171 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@AzazelNews · 26,04316 postsDoomPosting
@doomposting · 7,95110 postsThe Conspiracy Hole
@TheConspiracyHole · 104,9997 postsTartaria & History Channel
@TartariaHistoryChannel · 119,5115 postsTrudi Verstegen - Mama vs Maffia
@gweverstegen · 14,2725 postsGodlyEndTimeTruth
@GodlyEndTimeTruth · 1,2934 postsQ NEWS OFFICIAL #WWG1WGA 💛🇺🇸
@QNewsOfficialTV · 85,5554 postsDmitry Medvedev
@medvedev_telegramE · 40,1893 postsConspiracy Theory
@conspiracy_theory3 · 47,9892 postsEdom is Idumea
@edomisidumea · 4672 postsUnacceptable Fringe Covid mRNA NWO Whistleblowers Bugle
@CVmRNAWhistleblowers · 661 postВоенкор Кулько
@DKulko · 31,1541 postD.U.M.B.S and Underground War
@DUMBSandUnderground · 102,1011 postDan Scavino 🇺🇸
@DanScavino17 · 46,0721 postDoomsday Time Anomalies
@DoomsdayTimeAnomalies · 4,0731 postDoomsday Tradecraft
@DoomsdayTradecraft · 2,4231 postDr. Tenpenny
@DrTenpenny · 88,3701 postLauraAboli
@LauraAbolichannel · 167,3411 postMudflood Research, Tartaria, True Aryan History
@MatrixKillers · 2,9201 postAwakened Soulz✨️
@Moonlight65Q · 3551 postMr Pool
@Mr_Pool_7221 · 30,1661 postUnacceptable Fringe Chembetrayals
@PIPAlberta · 1351 postKELLY ‘ROBERT’ QTTURD
@Qtturd · 2,8411 postThe 12 Tribes of Jacob Bible
@The12TribesofJacobBible · 7351 postX WORLD 🌎
@X_W0RLD · 38,0071 postCruel History
@cruel_historyy · 103,5541 postDoomPosting Chat
@doomposters · 4,6251 postDoomsday Spray
@doomsdayspray · 1,2321 postFollow The White Rabbit ™ 🐇
@followsthewhiterabbit · 79,3331 postIntel Slava
@intelslava · 388,2251 postloop_rm_3117211
@looP_rM_3117211 · 3171 postMudflood
@mudflood · 1,7001 post🌿 Natural Cures 🌿
@naturalcuresforbody · 2,7671 postNewsTreason Channel 17 (Dave)
@newstreasonupdates · 35,0381 postPolice frequency
@police_frequency · 69,6141 postQAnon+ 🇺🇲🦅
@qanonplus · 28,4521 postDavid Clements
@theprofessorsrecord · 50,1571 postvDarkness Falls / Light_on_Liberty
@vDarknessFalls · 26,3141 postWAGNER Z GROUP/Z PMC WAGNER'Z
@wagner_group_pmcr · 40,7621 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@doomposting · 7,95111 postsGodlyEndTimeTruth
@GodlyEndTimeTruth · 1,2934 postsQ NEWS OFFICIAL #WWG1WGA 💛🇺🇸
@QNewsOfficialTV · 85,5554 postsTartaria & History Channel
@TartariaHistoryChannel · 119,5114 postsTartaria English Group
@TartarianEnglishGroup · 21,7714 postsTwitter (𝕏) Media Downloader دانلود از توییتر (ایکس)
@twittervid_bot · 145,8514 postsDoomsday Spray
@doomsdayspray · 1,2322 postsEARTHSEEDERS
@earthseeders · 16,3772 postsTrudi Verstegen - Mama vs Maffia
@gweverstegen · 14,2722 postsPolice frequency
@police_frequency · 69,6142 postsTraditional Britain Group
@TraditionalBritainGroup · 15,5942 posts🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺
@AussieCossack · 72,4831 postAzazel News
@AzazelNews · 26,0431 post🇳🇱👻 🏴☠️Clone π-rate Busters
@clonebusters · 4,8961 postDoomsday Time Anomalies
@DoomsdayTimeAnomalies · 4,0731 postEdom is Idumea
@edomisidumea · 4671 postFlock Safety
@Flock_Safety · 101 postFoxx Den 🦊
@FoxxDen14 · 4,5441 postIntel Slava
@intelslava · 388,2251 postLauraAboli
@LauraAbolichannel · 167,3411 postloop_rm_3117211
@looP_rM_3117211 · 3171 postMr Pool
@Mr_Pool_7221 · 30,1661 postTartaria Empire
@TARTARIAEMPIRE · 16,9541 postX WORLD 🌎
@X_W0RLD · 38,0071 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@FreedomDoc1 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 5 October 2026 – 5 October 2026
named in 1 post, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@RealHealthRanger · 63,018#1
@DrTenpenny · 88,370#2
@LauraAbolichannel · 167,341#3
@VigilantFox · 119,605#4
@SGTnewsNetwork · 110,421#5
@davidavocadowolfe · 102,342#6
@followsthewhiterabbit · 79,333#7
@drchristianenorthrup · 41,419#8
@DrDavidMartin · 50,180#9
@LeeMerritt · 15,951#10
@GeneralMCNews · 143,404#11
@joinmiFight · 5,202#12
@childrenshd · 52,877#13
@quidestveritaschannel · 653#14
@gatewaypunditofficial · 109,935#15
@Edward_Dowd · 12,253#16
@bioclandestine · 138,322#17
@ninoscorner · 79,036#18
@ShadowofEzra · 145,827#19
@qthestormrider777 · 154,075#20
@insiderpaper · 108,100#21
@patientadvocatebulldog · 3,931#22
@Jack_Posobiec · 115,596#23
@CPNHQs · 534#24
@realx22report · 159,080#25
@worlddoctorsalliance · 75,548#26
@DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 25,931#27
@thecrowhouseoffical · 29,388#28
@hiddeninplainsight1 · 38,315#29
@DrMikeYeadon · 26,948#30
@drloveariyana · 1,581#31
@covidbc · 31,083#32
@sayeregengmi · 27,671#33
@disclosurehub · 73,858#34
@Intelsky · 20,514#35
@truthavengers · 2,205#36
@Forbidden_History_tg · 33,735#37
@drsambaileyofficial · 16,338#38
@georgenews · 142,499#39
@DrJessicaRose · 6,414#40
@zeeemedia · 54,099#41
@DrJaneRuby · 57,805#42
@projectcamelotKerry · 75,160#43
@solarireport · 15,378#44
@ElevateThyMind · 76,460#45
@disclosetv · 319,718#46
@awakenedspecies · 140,873#47
@robinmg · 67,423#48
@stfn_news · 62,486#49
@DrPaulMarik · 9,681#50
@KanekoaTheGreat · 115,641#51
@Fall_of_the_Cabal · 81,600#52
@DrRobertOYoungNews · 1,194#53
@HATSTRUTH · 87,219#54
@celestesolum · 1,588#55
@PepeMatter · 144,615#56
@WeTheMedia · 141,412#57
@drgroupofficial · 19,671#58
@brighteonofficial · 1,746#59
@amandhavollmer · 18,634#60
@GeorgeWebb · 6,117#61
@TartariaHistoryChannel · 119,511#62
@truth_is_the_contagion · 4,436#63
@GeopoliticsAndEmpire · 12,521#64
@DoctorMercola · 31,132#65
@BryanArdis · 36,580#66
@DrTomCowanChannel · 6,707#67
@ParasitesTheGreatAwakening · 7,641#68
@cruel_historyy · 103,554#69
@BarbaraOneillOfficial · 66,004#70
@DrBergOfficial · 13,176#71
@CriticallyThinkingLinks · 1,144#72
@UPDATE_MikeAdams · 7,236#73
@maninamerica · 29,796#74
@BarbaraOneill_official · 109,716#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@RealHealthRanger · 63,018
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
@drgroupofficial · 19,671
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 September 2026
@Fall_of_the_Cabal · 81,600
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
@dr_judymikovitss · 25,405
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lee Merritt MD: FreedomDoc1” (@FreedomDoc1), 24,448 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FreedomDoc1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.