Channel
@medvedev_telegramE
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,155subscribers
-326 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002244914709 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @medvedev_telegramE |
| Description | https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=675072adc577eb7c524ce1b2®istryType=bloggersPermission |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/medvedev_telegramE |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 40,155 | -26 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 40,181 | +5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 40,176 | -14 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:14 | 40,190 | -25 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 40,215 | -24 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 40,239 | -29 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 40,268 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 40,267 | +9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:46 | 40,258 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 40,269 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 40,274 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 40,284 | -18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 40,302 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 40,310 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 40,323 | +15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 40,308 | +23 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 40,285 | -14 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 40,299 | -21 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 40,320 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 40,331 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 28 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (28 February 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 257,500 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 22:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
I never get tired of the arrogance of the European puny freaks. They slapped sweeping sanctions on our businesses, hurt the interests of millions of Russian citizens (by cancelling their credit cards, for one), and even banned cultural ties with our country, didn’t they? They’re waging an outright war with Russia by providing our enemy with everything one can think of, from missiles and intelligence to actual funds t…
About AI and the end of the world Lately, we’ve been hearing a lot from AI creators who are bemoaning humanity’s haste. They’ve been warning us that AI is dangerous, unpredictable, and developing too fast according to laws we don’t quite fathom. It’s time, they say, to slow down and make a pause before we feel really sorry when our intelligent brother goes berserk. Are these fears real? Especially given that many s…
From an interview with Vedomosti newspaper
Answers to RT’s Questions During a Visit to the Siberian Federal District
Berlin has accused Russia of an unproven attack on Leipzig Airport. Given the neo-Nazi, fiercely Russophobic course pursued by Germany's current leadership, this fabricated act of sabotage is the mildest form of punishment for their sins. They deserve direct strikes on all German facilities producing military equipment for the Banderite clique. And quite possibly, on certain other sites in Berlin as well. And then t…
The Finnish president really is an imbecile. He’s talking about defeating Russia by striking Wildberries, an online marketplace! His level of professional competence is beyond laughable. The man is morally repugnant and a fool, to boot. Then again, he was exactly the same back when he was Finland’s foreign minister. I remember him well. Nothing has changed: same face, same intellectual level…
The bloody clown, as if to spite his own roots and the legacy of his ancestors, continues to glorify Nazis and worship traitors of every stripe. First he turned Bandera into a political saint, then reburied the earthly remains of Melnik and Konovalets. And now he’s holding a competition to design a monument to Mazepa. At this rate, he might as well build pantheons in Kiev dedicated to Hitler and Mussolini. What a di…
Western European dogs are barking hysterically about the so-called Russian shadow fleet. So, what exactly are they talking about? This refers to ordinary merchant vessels that sail under non-Russian flags but carry cargo in our interests. Such flags are usually known as ‘flags of convenience.’ This is a system whereby a vessel is registered in a country other than that of its owner in order to save on taxes and regu…
Three Quotes from the Past Week 1. A certain Kaja and her comrades announced that the European Union is close to imposing a lifetime ban on Special Military Operation participants from entering the EU. Well, that is like trying to scare a hedgehog with a bare backside. We should urge the European Union to do this as soon as possible. In that case, millions of our citizens will lose all their foolish illusions about…
The US turned 250. Is it a role model or an “evil empire”? I think, neither. But here is what most countries on this planet would agree on: America has no right to make decisions for others. Any state, large or small, can sort out its problems on its own. The US and the White House have no business imposing their will on others. Let them clean up their own mess at home first.
The capture of Konstantinovka is a clear victory for our soldiers. It marks an important step toward the complete liberation of the Donbas and the achievement of the goals of the Special Military Operation. I wonder what the reaction will be from various lying scoundrels who are spreading nonsense about “Ukraine regaining the momentum”? That green louse might say that the surrender of Konstantinovka is a major victo…
No matter how Russophobic the Polish elites may be, one has to admit that on the issue of the vile Kyiv Banderite scum they have taken a correct and honest stance, unlike other European countries and brainless Brussels. I wonder what their position would be if, say, instead of a family crypt, the Duce’s body were reinterred in the Roman Pantheon, and a grandiose monument to Hitler were erected in Berlin. Or is that a…
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @medvedev_telegramE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dmitry Medvedev” (@medvedev_telegramE), 40,155 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medvedev_telegramE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.