Channel
@medvedev_telegramE
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,051subscribers
-430 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002244914709 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @medvedev_telegramE |
| Description | https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=675072adc577eb7c524ce1b2®istryType=bloggersPermission |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/medvedev_telegramE |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:49 | 40,051 | -3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:41 | 40,054 | -14 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:46 | 40,068 | +1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:49 | 40,067 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:51 | 40,070 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:46 | 40,077 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:06 | 40,086 | -5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:08 | 40,091 | -12 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:15 | 40,103 | +1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 40,102 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:59 | 40,105 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:57 | 40,111 | +10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:40 | 40,101 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:37 | 40,110 | -15 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:17 | 40,125 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:59 | 40,130 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 40,133 | -10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:01 | 40,143 | -14 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:10 | 40,157 | -11 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:29 | 40,168 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 28 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 177 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (28 February 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 163,400 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Yes, Musk has finally seen the light, even if too late, and admitted that it was a mistake to give the Banderite scum access to Starlink's military capabilities. His much-vaunted satellite network has been used to strike civilian targets since the very beginning. Playing the “Starshield is not the same as Starlink” card won’t get him off the hook, either. The blood spilled on account of either is the same deep red. E…
I don’t share the giddy excitement over the CAS hockey ruling and Russia’s participation in certain international events. Given the appalling attitude that Canadian scumbag carney has shown towards our country and our people, competing would be nothing but a headache for our athletes. Sure, they are starving for major tournaments, and an athlete’s prime is fleeting. We could, of course, keep putting up with this mock…
Posted without readable text
Trump: “They [Ukrainians] are not gonna do it with him. He doesn't wanna settle. He says he wants to settle, but he doesn't. No, I'm not a big fan of Zelensky. They've destroyed that country.” After that, a fidgety creature with an absurd name, for some reason ending in English with a double “y,” should have taken rat poison or gobbled down a horse dose of his favorite coke. But the beast is so cowardly that it won…
The green louse is outraged at the US cutting off Ukraine from military intelligence. Without it, it goes blind, panics, and runs around. And what did it expect? When you’re rude to your sponsors, they get angry. Trump is not Scholz. He doesn’t want to be seen as a liver sausage, nor does he enjoy being bitten by bloodsucking bugs.
Kiev moron's request to “block” Russia’s Rassvet satellite constellation can only imply its destruction. And that will lead to a full-scale space war. I hope the US understands this. Otherwise, their low-orbit Starlink satellites will then come dropping like decorations off a dried-out Christmas tree. Space is a very cramped place so it's a must to be mutually polite.
Silvio Berlusconi would have turned 90 today. He was probably no angel. But he wanted the best for his Italy and understood Russia's place in the world. With his passing, the era of strong European politicians came to an end. In their place came shortsighted, spiteful Russophobes who are doing everything they can to drag Europe into war with Russia. And the chances of plunging the world into a new conflict are the h…
Polish foreign minister Sikorski has proudly declared: “We've been fighting the Russians since before the United States existed.” It’s true to some extent, but he forgot to add: “And we’ve lost every time.” As it was in 1612, and as it was during the “Partitions of Poland” in the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. Of course, the proud minister knows nothing about how the ultimate demise of the Poles was prevented durin…
I never get tired of the arrogance of the European puny freaks. They slapped sweeping sanctions on our businesses, hurt the interests of millions of Russian citizens (by cancelling their credit cards, for one), and even banned cultural ties with our country, didn’t they? They’re waging an outright war with Russia by providing our enemy with everything one can think of, from missiles and intelligence to actual funds t…
About AI and the end of the world Lately, we’ve been hearing a lot from AI creators who are bemoaning humanity’s haste. They’ve been warning us that AI is dangerous, unpredictable, and developing too fast according to laws we don’t quite fathom. It’s time, they say, to slow down and make a pause before we feel really sorry when our intelligent brother goes berserk. Are these fears real? Especially given that many s…
From an interview with Vedomosti newspaper
Answers to RT’s Questions During a Visit to the Siberian Federal District
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @medvedev_telegramE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dmitry Medvedev” (@medvedev_telegramE), 40,051 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medvedev_telegramE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.