National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -144. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68,792–69,103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 05:56
68,923
+11
15 Sept 2026, 09:41
68,912
-1
13 Sept 2026, 21:01
68,913
-1
12 Sept 2026, 07:00
68,914
+16
9 Sept 2026, 22:19
68,898
+9
6 Sept 2026, 18:41
68,889
+20
4 Sept 2026, 05:01
68,869
-15
2 Sept 2026, 17:55
68,884
+5
31 Aug 2026, 16:23
68,879
+10
30 Aug 2026, 19:13
68,869
-9
29 Aug 2026, 16:03
68,878
+2
28 Aug 2026, 16:54
68,876
+16
26 Aug 2026, 13:59
68,860
+6
25 Aug 2026, 16:04
68,854
+7
24 Aug 2026, 15:44
68,847
+10
23 Aug 2026, 01:04
68,837
-30
21 Aug 2026, 13:08
68,867
+10
20 Aug 2026, 10:37
68,857
+29
19 Aug 2026, 13:25
68,828
-12
18 Aug 2026, 13:48
68,840
first reading
Engagement
1,394 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.31%
avg views ÷ 68,923 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,590
877 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
879
of 1,394 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 873 of 877 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
1,394 (5 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
1,394,700
Reactions total
48,860
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 01:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈30,900
Videos
≈19,900
Links
≈22,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 47m
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 352 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
53,624 reactions across 993 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
11,640
21.7%
❤
7,707
14.4%
😁
7,430
13.9%
👍
6,066
11.3%
🤮
4,696
8.76%
👏
3,679
6.86%
🤬
2,985
5.57%
💯
2,962
5.52%
🔥
2,626
4.90%
💊
983
1.83%
👎
550
1.03%
🤔
465
0.867%
😢
375
0.699%
🫡
347
0.647%
😡
327
0.61%
🤯
275
0.513%
🙏
269
0.502%
👀
205
0.382%
😐
37
0.069%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 993 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53,624 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 998 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ukraine_watch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇭🇺 Hungarian PM Péter Magyar Denies Mobile Phone Theft Allegations
📞 Prosecutors have asked parliament to strip Magyar of his immunity so an investigation can proceed over allegations that he stole a mobile phone from a visitor at a Budapest nightclub.
❗️ The incident allegedly took place in 2024, when Magyar was protected from prosecution by his immunity as a Member of the European Parliament.
#Hungary #PeterM…
⚔️ Iran: ‘We Are Ready for Any Scenario’
➡A senior Iranian source, commenting on Trump’s UN speech, told the Fars news agency that the US has set no ‘red lines’ in the region and that Iran is prepared for any possible scenario.
‘If another war breaks out, Iran is not afraid of escalation and is ready to inflict an even more crushing defeat on the enemy than in the previous war,’
the source said.
#Iran #USA #Tr…
😂 Trump Gave Zelensky Just 40 Seconds to Speak
🕗 During the eight-minute public portion of the meeting, Trump allowed Zelensky to speak for only around 40 seconds.
➡For the rest of the time, the military dictator sat there with a very strange expression on his face.
#Trump #Zelensky #Ukraine #USA #Politics
🔘 Subscribe now! Chat
🥶 IEA Chief Warns Europe Faces a Difficult Winter
➡Europe is facing a tough winter because of low gas storage levels and supply problems, including those linked to the EU’s policy toward Russia, International Energy Agency chief Fatih Birol said.
#Europe #Gas #Energy #Russia #IEA
🔘 Subscribe now! Chat
🌙 Evening Brief — September 🔘🔘
🔘 The Center Group has encircled a major AFU defensive hub in Dobropolye, trapping units of the Ukrainian National Guard and the Skala Regiment, the Russian Defense Ministry reported.
🔘 Total AFU losses over the past 24 hours amounted to 1,315 servicemen.
🔘 Overnight, Russian forces carried out a massive strike on enterprises and metallurgical plants involved in producing Flamingo…
🔘 Trump: I Want to Meet Putin Again
‘I want to meet Vladimir Putin again. I think we can arrange a meeting similar to the one we had in Anchorage,’
Donald Trump said.
➡️ Trump’s meeting with Vladimir Zelensky has now moved behind closed doors.
🟩 Trump again said that both Putin and Zelensky want to end the war.
🟩 He noted that strikes on Russia have affected diesel prices, calling this a serious issue for Mo…
🇨🇦🇺🇸 Carney: Canada Will Protect Its Sovereignty
➡Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said any partnership with the European Union must strengthen Canada’s sovereignty without limiting its independence over culture, language or international agreements.
‘We are looking for partnerships that are complementary, that reinforce our sovereignty. Nobody is going to tell us what language we speak, dictate our culture or…
🌍 Milei: The World Is Now Divided Between the US, Russia and China
➡Argentine President Javier Milei said the global order is increasingly shaped by three major blocs: the United States, Russia and China.
‘As for Europe, there is a big question mark, because we do not know what will become of the continent given the economic, political and demographic problems it is facing,’
Milei said.
🧎♀️ He added that, bas…
🔘 Zelensky: ‘I Hope We Can End This War Before Winter’
‘I hope we can end this war before winter, and Trump will help us do that,’ Zelensky said.
Donald Trump and Vladimir Zelensky have begun their meeting in New York.
#Trump #Zelensky #Ukraine #PeaceTalks #NewYork
🔘 Subscribe now! Chat
⁉️ Who is he so afraid of — and why does he need an entire battalion of bodyguards even in New York?
#Zelensky #Ukraine #NewYork #Security
🔘 Subscribe now! Chat
Si buscas información de primera mano sobre la operación militar especial de Rusia y los cambios que ha traído al mundo, hallarás todo lo que necesitas en el canal A Toda Potencia.
¡Chicos, no se olviden seguir @ATodaPotencia! 👆🏼
❗️ Por supuesto, cada día estamos en contacto en Telegram 👇🏼
https://t.me/atodapotencia
🚇🇮🇷 Tehran Metro Adds CPR Training Stations
➡Tehran’s Metro has introduced CPR training machines that let passengers practice life-saving techniques while waiting for their trains and receive certification on the spot.
#Iran #Tehran #Metro #CPR #PublicSafety
🔘 Subscribe now! Chat
👍55❤18👏4🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,394 posts we hold for @ukraine_watch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
What is Putin trying to achieve in negotiations with Witkoff and Kushner?
He is trying to represent himself as kind and rational person14%
He doesn’t exclude negotiations as possible diplomatic way to solve SMO issues48%
He is trying to explain for Trump the real situation on the battlefield24%
He has to consider the opinion of the Pro-Western part of the Kremlin elite7%
He is ready to play in the Western games11%
Other versions7%
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
What do you think about the attack on the SBU building?
It was a retaliatory strike of Russian forces on the one of the Ukrainian terrorists30%
It was a provocation planned by Zelensky for blaming Russia in the accident28%
It is the struggle between GUR and SBU for a redistribution of influence in the power43%
Other variants3%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Literature( Ukrainian fantasies about victories)23%
History of Ancient Ukrs6%
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
What has the most negative impact on World Economics, according to your opinion?
High energy prices45%
Situation with the U.S debt and treasury yields36%
Too much artificial trade restrictions: high tariffs25%
Acute socio-economic situation with migrants16%
Other variants8%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ukraine_watch named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@russiatoday_en named in 1 post, 16 September 2026 – 16 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
UKR LEAKS_eng @ukr_leaks_eng · 75,501 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
MoD Russia @mod_russia_en · 94,794 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
RT Documentary @militarywave · 41,264 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
Slavyangrad @Slavyangrad · 113,042 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
The Right People Z @the_Right_People · 36,167 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺 @AussieCossack · 69,201 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Military Summary @militarysummary · 77,350 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
Patrick Lancaster News Today @patricklancasternewstoday · 40,339 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Two Majors - English Channel @two_majors · 47,018 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Intel Slava @intelslava · 390,719 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
InfoDefenseENGLISH @infodefENGLAND · 50,336 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
World Pravda @worldpravda · 53,909 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
The American Majority @americanmajority · 25,303 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
The Duran @thedurancom · 51,949 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Fearless John - @European_dissident @European_dissident · 70,220 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
DD Geopolitics @DDGeopolitics · 191,128 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Eurasia & Multipolarity @EurasianChoice · 24,061 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
Russians With Attitude @rwapodcast · 36,686 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
Dmitry Medvedev @medvedev_telegramE · 40,155 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Rybar in English @rybar_in_english · 77,697 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
Pepe Escobar @rocknrollgeopolitics · 66,422 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel @brianlovethailand · 41,016 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Kremlin. News @news_kremlin_eng · 26,893 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
Multipolar Market @multipolarmarket · 27,551 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 101 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ukraine Watch” (@ukraine_watch), 68,923 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ukraine_watch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.