International news — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 60 days, net -444. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67,804–76,028 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 17:38
69,680
+927
26 Sept 2026, 17:00
68,753
-448
19 Sept 2026, 12:58
69,201
-96
17 Sept 2026, 03:38
69,297
-117
15 Sept 2026, 01:20
69,414
-35
13 Sept 2026, 14:19
69,449
-116
11 Sept 2026, 18:17
69,565
-205
9 Sept 2026, 06:57
69,770
-4,194
5 Sept 2026, 19:39
73,964
+766
3 Sept 2026, 19:17
73,198
+1,555
2 Sept 2026, 12:27
71,643
-44
1 Sept 2026, 09:53
71,687
-39
31 Aug 2026, 11:25
71,726
+309
30 Aug 2026, 09:08
71,417
+1,611
29 Aug 2026, 06:06
69,806
-259
28 Aug 2026, 07:13
70,065
-158
27 Aug 2026, 05:52
70,223
-44
26 Aug 2026, 09:08
70,267
-43
25 Aug 2026, 07:13
70,310
-72
24 Aug 2026, 07:43
70,382
first reading
Engagement
1,274 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 127 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 69,680 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,410
660 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
660
of 1,274 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 658 of 660 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
1,274 (5 August 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
5,549,111
Reactions total
63,150
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Oct 2026, 18:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈28,700
Videos
≈17,800
Links
≈6,890
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6h 55m
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 452 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
94,469 reactions across 997 posts, in 69 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
15,834
16.8%
👍
12,448
13.2%
❤
7,962
8.43%
💯
7,628
8.07%
👏
7,162
7.58%
🔥
6,084
6.44%
😁
5,858
6.20%
🤬
5,155
5.46%
🤪
5,032
5.33%
🥴
3,315
3.51%
👎
2,496
2.64%
💊
1,920
2.03%
🤔
1,883
1.99%
🍌
1,881
1.99%
🙏
1,712
1.81%
😈
1,293
1.37%
🫡
907
0.96%
🥱
763
0.808%
🌭
567
0.6%
🤯
379
0.401%
49 further kinds
4,190
4.44%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 998 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94,469 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❗️Putin to visit Turkmenistan on a working visit from October 8-9.
"During the visit, the President will participate in the Council of Heads of State of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and the Caspian Environmental Summit," said Putin's aide, Ushakov.
Putin will also meet Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on October 9.
@AussieCossack
❗️🇷🇺⚡ Kremlin warns of rising tensions over Lithuania
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov warned that Lithuania’s move to remove its constitutional ban on hosting nuclear weapons, along with a possible permanent U.S. military base in the country, could further escalate tensions with Russia.
Lithuania’s parliament has approved the measure in its first vote. A second vote is still required.
Peskov said Moscow is closely…
❗️Trump:
What’s happening in France is nothing less than out of control mass migration. This isn’t about schools, this is about Islam wanting to take over a once great Country!
@AussieCossack
❗️The Lithuanian Parliament has voted to abolish the ban on the deployment of nuclear weapons. The decision requires a second vote in three months to come into effect.
The resolution stipulates that Article 137 of the Constitution, which prohibits the deployment of weapons of mass destruction on the territory of the republic, will be removed. The same article also prohibits the presence of foreign military bases.
A…
❗️Marco Rubio on Ukraine:
NATO membership is not on the table as we speak.
Right now, we're simply focused on the ending of this conflict.
@AussieCossack
❗️South Korea received insufficient apologies from Ukraine regarding the disclosure of information about the transfer of prisoners from North Korea – Yonhap
"Ukrainian Minister Andriy Sybiga sent a message of apology, but its level does not meet Seoul's expectations," – the publication quoted the South Korean Foreign Minister as saying.
@AussieCossack
❗️France and Germany are pushing for a new EU “kill switch” that could quickly restrict a country’s access to the European single market over unfair trade practices.
China is widely seen as the main target, although it is not explicitly named. The proposed measure could be used within days, ranging from restrictions on specific products to broader market exclusion.
@AussieCossack
❗️Poland and Romania say they cannot expand support for Ukraine’s grain exports through Europe.
Romanian Agriculture Minister Barna Tánczos said the interests of Romanian farmers remain a priority, as the influx of Ukrainian grain and low water levels on the Danube are putting additional pressure on Romanian ports.
Poland’s Infrastructure Ministry also said it currently has no plans to increase the transit of Ukrai…
❗️Liberal Senator James Paterson described the Greens policy of opposing Australian weapons and cash for Ukraine's military as "repugnant".
Ukraine’s ambassador to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, said: “I cannot believe, then, that the Greens want Putin to win."
Green's leader Shoebridge’s explicit statement opposing military aid to Ukraine came as a surprise to many party supporters and a blow to the Ukrainian di…
❗️Trump:
The war will end very quickly, and prices are going to come down very sharply. You might say, "Please, please, sir, it's going down too fast!"
@AussieCossack
🤣78💊26❤13🤪10🤬8🌭6🥴4🦄4
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,274 posts we hold for @AussieCossack. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@AussieCossack edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 October 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What do Ned Kelly, the man with the tuckerbag from Waltzing Matilda, Desi Freeman and Aussie Cossack have in common?
They were all wanted by police but they never gave up.38%
All on the right side of history. I would definitely sit down and have a beer with all of them.47%
Julie EKAREN Grant will say this poll is inflaming social cohesion in Australian.12%
All of the above.18%
None of the above - they are all criminals and deserved what the police did to them.2%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 81 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 81 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Australiaforfreedom @australiaforfreedom · 19,601 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 September 2026
Zeee Media 🎙 @zeeemedia · 54,320 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
AustraliaOneParty_Official @australiaoneparty_official · 32,488 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026
🇷🇺☦️ Russian БaZa ☦️🇷🇺 @RussianBaZa · 20,262 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
Two Majors - English Channel @two_majors · 47,318 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Ukraine Watch @ukraine_watch · 68,936 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Lord Bebo & Friends @myLordBebo · 72,614 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Slavyangrad @Slavyangrad · 112,561 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Xoaquin Flores - New Resistance @NewResistance · 28,342 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
Russians With Attitude @rwapodcast · 36,495 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
Chef Pete Evans @ChefPeteEvans · 28,827 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
RT Documentary @militarywave · 41,266 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
Fearless John - @European_dissident @European_dissident · 69,877 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
DD Geopolitics @DDGeopolitics · 190,683 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
World Pravda @worldpravda · 53,799 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Geopolitics Prime @geopolitics_prime · 290,908 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
AntiFakeNews @yourantifakenews · 19,184 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 October 2026
InfoDefenseENGLISH @infodefENGLAND · 50,315 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Node of Time EN @node_of_time_en · 19,819 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 September 2026
Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel @brianlovethailand · 40,878 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Kremlin. News @news_kremlin_eng · 26,864 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
Dan Kovalik @danielmkovalik · 38,857 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
🎧 CJ Onfrab🔊🎼 (Official) @Onfrabmusic · 48,206 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
UKR LEAKS_eng @ukr_leaks_eng · 75,294 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 98 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺” (@AussieCossack), 69,680 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AussieCossack.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.