بِسْمِ اللهِ الرَّحْمٰنِ الرَّحِيْمِ
Bismillah Al Rahman Al Rahim
Anti-Imperialist & Anti Zionist content -
World Geopolitics & MENA - War, News, updates, memes, sources, links 📍Beirut
God is for All - الله كريم
Created
27 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net -470. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,312–41,923 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 04:18
41,382
-44
5 Sept 2026, 22:37
41,426
-32
3 Sept 2026, 17:16
41,458
-6
2 Sept 2026, 13:17
41,464
+4
1 Sept 2026, 15:33
41,460
-40
31 Aug 2026, 12:55
41,500
-5
30 Aug 2026, 13:57
41,505
-22
29 Aug 2026, 15:05
41,527
-20
28 Aug 2026, 16:42
41,547
-10
27 Aug 2026, 19:05
41,557
-6
26 Aug 2026, 21:17
41,563
-18
25 Aug 2026, 20:54
41,581
-21
24 Aug 2026, 19:14
41,602
-38
23 Aug 2026, 00:27
41,640
-17
21 Aug 2026, 12:48
41,657
-14
20 Aug 2026, 14:53
41,671
-10
19 Aug 2026, 14:11
41,681
-18
18 Aug 2026, 10:49
41,699
-9
17 Aug 2026, 09:34
41,708
-33
15 Aug 2026, 17:47
41,741
first reading
Engagement
686 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.00%
avg views ÷ 41,382 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
576 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
576
of 686 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held
686 (5 August 2026 – 10 September 2026)
Views total
954,598
Reactions total
48,754
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Sept 2026, 12:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈16,300
Videos
≈15,400
Links
≈4,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 57m
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 128 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
58,468 reactions across 667 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
12,393
21.2%
🖕
6,752
11.5%
🤣
5,831
9.97%
❤🔥
5,038
8.62%
❤
4,698
8.04%
🤬
4,551
7.78%
🫡
2,892
4.95%
🤮
2,736
4.68%
😁
2,008
3.43%
👏
1,967
3.36%
💯
1,765
3.02%
🙏
1,152
1.97%
⚡
986
1.69%
👀
835
1.43%
💊
635
1.09%
🎉
496
0.848%
🤩
482
0.824%
🥰
457
0.782%
✍
381
0.652%
🤪
290
0.496%
32 further kinds
2,123
3.63%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 686 of the 686 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59,967 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 686 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 686 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stayfreeworld. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 686 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 10 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇵🇰🇸🇦🇹🇷⚡️🇾🇪🇾🇪Military action by Pakistan against Yemen — perhaps at another time.
Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson stated that, at present, there is no discussion about a military response by Islamabad under the Mecca Agreement in reaction to Ansar Allah’s attacks on Saudi Arabia.
Haider Khan, responding to a question on how Pakistan intends to fulfill its commitments under the Mecca Agreement given the Yeme…
🇾🇪🇾🇪⚔️🇸🇦🇺🇸🏴☠️ Entertainment! According to a fighter affiliated with the mercenaries:
The reason for the withdrawal from Al-Khawka is that the communication devices were hacked, and an AI-generated audio recording of Tariq Saleh ordered them to withdraw from the city.
So than why not taking it back?😄
@stayfreeworld
🇾🇪🇾🇪⚔️🇸🇦🇺🇸🏴☠️AFP reported that Yemeni Armed Forces today, after taking control of the strategic city of al‑Mokha, also liberated the island of Zuqar in the southern Red Sea.
The news agency, citing three sources within the Saudi‑backed exiled Yemeni government, added that Yemeni forces are on the verge of gaining full control over the coastal towns along this strait — including the city of Dhobab — in order to esta…
🇾🇪🇾🇪⚔️🇸🇦🇺🇸🏴☠️A better satellite image has been published by Reuters of the King Khalid Air Base, which hosts Saudi F15 fighter jets, which shows the effect of an Ansarullah missile hit and a possible fire in the hangar of this base.
@stayfreeworld
🇮🇷⚔️🇺🇸🇯🇴🏴☠️CBS News, citing informed sources, reports that “several U.S. military aircraft were damaged during Iran’s Wednesday‑dawn strikes on the Muwaffaq al‑Salti Air Base in Jordan.”
According to these individuals—who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment publicly—around eight F‑15s sustained minor damage and were reportedly returned to service, while one A‑10 Thunderbolt w…
🇾🇪🇾🇪⚔️🇸🇦🇺🇸🏴☠️ Satellite images from September 9th show significant damage to the Aramco-owned Jizan refinery, with at least four oil storage tanks reportedly destroyed in the recent Yemeni attacks.
@stayfreeworld
🇾🇪🇾🇪⚔️🇸🇦🇺🇸🏴☠️ Yemeni Armed Forces: With God's help, the Yemeni Armed Forces managed to shoot down a Saudi-owned, armed reconnaissance aircraft of the "Kariyel" type while it was engaged in hostile activities in the airspace of Hajjah province. The aircraft was brought down using appropriate weaponry.
@stayfreeworld
🔥44👏13🥰5❤2🎉1
Signed Avrevs
Showing the 12 most recent of 686 posts we hold for @stayfreeworld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@stayfreeworld edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
🇻🇪Venezuela Network Report | Intel, Urgent News and Archives | TOTAL CHAVISTA DEATH Edition @VenezuelaNetwork · 12,188#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Quds News Network @QudsNen · 114,132 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
Middle East Observer @me_observer_TG · 38,702 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
The Cradle @thecradlemedia · 56,156 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
WarFront Witness @wfwitness · 81,837 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Press TV @presstv · 93,303 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
Mediterranean Man @medmannews · 76,853 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
Lebanese News and Updates @LebUpdate · 77,794 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
Geopolitics Watch @GeoPWatch · 80,740 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸 @rnintel · 174,832 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
WarfareAnalysis News @WarfareAnalysis · 31,761 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
Enemy Watch — Official @enemywatch · 29,135 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
ResistanceTrench mirror @RezistanceTrench · 42,359 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
War Noir @war_noir · 53,345 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Tabz - Live News @tabzlive · 66,216 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
AlHaq News | Iran-US War Updates @AlHaqNews · 32,175 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
GAZA NOW IN ENGLISH @gazaalanpa · 175,900 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
Middle East Spectator — MES @middle_east_spectator · 401,273 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Fotros Resistance @FotrosResistancee · 69,121 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
Middle East Eye @MiddleEastEye_TG · 57,239 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Clash Report @ClashReport · 109,436 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Megatron @megatron_ron · 76,206 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Intel Republic @Intel_Republic12 · 97,696 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Lord Bebo & Friends @myLordBebo · 72,950 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Skuad Al-Qassam @skuadpemudaislam · 29,626 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 56 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stay Free” (@stayfreeworld), 41,382 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stayfreeworld.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.