International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 60 days, net +3,093. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,883–67,387 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 12:20
66,792
-75
29 Sept 2026, 16:17
66,867
+440
18 Sept 2026, 02:55
66,427
+38
15 Sept 2026, 19:58
66,389
+5
14 Sept 2026, 06:59
66,384
-15
12 Sept 2026, 14:19
66,399
+183
10 Sept 2026, 11:37
66,216
+724
7 Sept 2026, 08:57
65,492
-18
4 Sept 2026, 11:19
65,510
+28
2 Sept 2026, 19:47
65,482
+140
1 Sept 2026, 21:34
65,342
+1,864
31 Aug 2026, 20:06
63,478
+54
30 Aug 2026, 20:07
63,424
+21
29 Aug 2026, 21:37
63,403
-46
28 Aug 2026, 22:07
63,449
-9
27 Aug 2026, 23:25
63,458
-23
26 Aug 2026, 23:15
63,481
-30
25 Aug 2026, 22:34
63,511
-32
24 Aug 2026, 19:56
63,543
-60
23 Aug 2026, 06:58
63,603
first reading
Engagement
2,188 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 124 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.66%
avg views ÷ 66,792 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,440
1,071 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,071
of 2,188 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1,068 of 1,071 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
2,188 (5 August 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
2,618,383
Reactions total
53,864
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Oct 2026, 16:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈35,800
Videos
≈48,400
Links
≈13,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5h 52m
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 518 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
50,235 reactions across 997 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
10,204
20.3%
❤
6,162
12.3%
💩
5,712
11.4%
🤣
4,686
9.33%
🔥
3,830
7.62%
🤬
2,487
4.95%
😁
2,392
4.76%
👍
2,307
4.59%
👀
2,231
4.44%
🖕
2,125
4.23%
🤮
1,596
3.18%
👏
845
1.68%
💯
776
1.54%
👎
444
0.884%
🎉
390
0.776%
❤🔥
378
0.752%
🤔
355
0.707%
🥰
332
0.661%
🫡
286
0.569%
😭
276
0.549%
21 further kinds
2,421
4.82%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 997 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50,235 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 September 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tabzlive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 September 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇾🇪❌🇾🇪 — Ansarallah has released a statement on the PLC's recent attempted offensive against the Bab el-Mandeb front, announcing that the PLC offensive "southwest of Al-Wazi'iyah" was repelled. Ansarallah claims to have destroyed multiple armored vehicles and cause dozens of PLC casualties.
Ansarallah also reports that PLC reinforcements towards the sector were targeted with ballistic missiles, causing further casual…
🇾🇪❌🇸🇦 — KSA's General Authority of Civil Aviation has acknowledged successful Ansarallah strikes against King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Intl. Airport, Jazan and Najran Intl. Airport, Najran yesterday.
Three people were hospitalized for minor injuries, and airport property was damaged.
🇸🇦🇾🇪⚡️ — Saudi-led "Coalition to Restore Legitimacy in Yemen" announces the interception of one ballistic missile launched towards Khamis Mushait, southwestern KSA.
Likely targeting King Khalid AB.
🇺🇸🇫🇷⚡️ — President Trump on the student protests in France:
What’s happening in France is nothing less than out of control mass migration.
This isn’t about schools, this is about Islam wanting to take over a once great Country!
🇷🇺⚡️ — Russia’s crude exports rose to 3.76 million barrels per day in the four weeks through October 4, the highest level in two months, as higher prices pushed the value of shipments to their highest since before the Ukraine war started, Bloomberg reports.
Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries have reduced processing capacity, forcing more crude into exports while contributing to domestic fuel shortages.
At the …
🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️ — California Governor Gavin Newsom:
After sending the National Guard and Marines to occupy California, Donald Trump is now saying our foreign enemies should “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego.
He is deranged and dangerous.
📣 We’re still looking for new contributors to join our team.
At the moment we need people who can help cover the news regularly to improve the consistency and quality of the channel. We prefer people who already have experience.
Reach out to us via channel DMs!
🇬🇧🇺🇸⚡️ — A 22-year-old British man has been arrested on suspicion of preparing terrorist acts in connection with the suspected RAF Fairford plot, counter-terrorism police said.
He was arrested in Westminster, London, earlier today.
It is the seventh arrest linked to the investigation, though no one has been charged.
🇺🇸⚡️ — President Trump is lashing out on Fox News, accusing the network of giving more coverage to Democratic and “Jihadist” candidates than to Republicans and MAGA.
Trump also complained that Fox does not show his rallies the morning after and accused the network of generally promoting Democrats instead of Republicans and MAGA, saying it has “totally lost their way.”
🇺🇸🇨🇳⚡️ — The Trump administration has discussed reciprocal visits to nuclear facilities in the U.S. and China as a potential confidence-building measure, according to CNN.
The idea was first raised by Chinese officials during meetings with U.S. counterparts this year, with discussions including possible visits to U.S. Department of Energy national laboratories and their Chinese counterparts, as well as nuclear testi…
🤡35😁11❤4🤔3✍1👎1💩1
Signed Tabz
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,188 posts we hold for @tabzlive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 99 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
The Defender Dome @DefenderDome · 21,412 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
Geopolitics Watch @GeoPWatch · 80,558 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
WarFront Witness @wfwitness · 81,174 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
AMK Mapping @AMK_Mapping · 60,184 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
War Noir @war_noir · 53,355 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Middle East Observer @me_observer_TG · 38,575 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
AntiFakeNews @yourantifakenews · 19,184 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 October 2026
Clash Report @ClashReport · 109,635 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸 @rnintel · 165,523 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela @BellumActaNews · 114,067 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tabz - Live News” (@tabzlive), 66,792 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tabzlive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
