Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Simurgh: An Eye on the Enemy

Channel

The Simurgh: An Eye on the Enemy

@SimurghRes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

17,016subscribers

-79 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002301862635
TypeChannel
Username@SimurghRes
DescriptionStay informed with unfiltered news Focused on the axis of resistance Covering developments against "Israel" and its allies Includes real-time news updates and analyses We accept ads Contact: @SimurrghBot or via Channel Direct Messages or Via @QR3MO
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SimurghRes

Growth

17,01617,09517,055.56 August 2026 — 17,095 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,095 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,091 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,081 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,072 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,074 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,072 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,067 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,057 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,050 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,053 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,055 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,043 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,038 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,016 subscribers6 August 202621 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net -79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,004–17,107 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 11:3217,016-22
20 Aug 2026, 10:4317,038-5
19 Aug 2026, 10:1417,043-12
18 Aug 2026, 07:0317,055+2
17 Aug 2026, 10:0417,053+3
15 Aug 2026, 17:2317,050-7
14 Aug 2026, 03:0617,057-10
12 Aug 2026, 19:4617,067-5
11 Aug 2026, 16:2117,072-2
10 Aug 2026, 17:5417,074+2
9 Aug 2026, 15:1417,072-9
8 Aug 2026, 16:0617,081-10
7 Aug 2026, 15:3517,091-4
6 Aug 2026, 13:3317,095no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:1817,095first reading

Engagement

343 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 17,016 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,910
343 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
343
of 343 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held343 (5 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total654,844
Reactions total28,420
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,640
Videos
1,570
Links
960

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 01m
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 57 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

26,769 reactions across 324 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,80621.7%
🤣5,70821.3%
🔥3,55013.3%
🤬2,3958.95%
💯1,8016.73%
👍1,5525.80%
😁1,2974.85%
👏8783.28%
🫡6552.45%
🤔6042.26%
😡5231.95%
🥰5121.91%
😢3651.36%
👎3121.17%
❤‍🔥2721.02%
😱1600.598%
🙏1370.512%
🤯1030.385%
👌890.332%
🤝500.187%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 343 of the 343 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,420reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 343 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC764 views10 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🇮🇷📞🇵🇰一 Araghchi discusses by phone with Pakistani Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir the latest regional developments and ways to enhance peace, stability and security in the West Asia region. @SimurghRes

👍8🔥2

22 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC773 views11 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🇮🇷📞🇪🇬— Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty held a phone call to discuss recent developments in the Middle East, including the situations in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea. @SimurghRes

8👍3

22 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC767 views20 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇱❌🇹🇷🇸🇾一 A senior Israeli intelligence official to JP: - Unless Israel draws clear red lines in Syria and the Mediterranean, the Turkish army and navy will further encroach on Israel's northern and maritime borders. - Israel could find itself facing Turkish tanks on the Golan Heights and Turkish warships off the coast of Kayseri. @SimurghRes

😁155

22 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC881 views38 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🇮🇷一 Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Mohsen Rezaei: - If America starts an economic war, not a single drop of oil will leave the Persian Gulf. - What Trump has started under the guise of economic warfare is mere propaganda. What does he want to do that he hasn't already done? As for the issue of a naval blockade, it's not a new one. We have shipped 70 million barrels of oil in the past two mon

32👌3💯3

22 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC870 views36 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

🇮🇷一 Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Mohsen Rezaei: -If Trump wants to take any action, we will respond forcefully and decisively. - Certainly, we will make changes to our war tactics, and there will be shifts in Iran's diplomatic behavior. - We say to all neighboring countries: Do not participate in the American economic war against us, or we will consider you enemies. - We are not seeking

👍21🔥8💯4🤣21

22 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,080 views43 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

🇮🇷❌🇺🇸— Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian: The Supreme Leader has also publicly emphasized that we must move beyond the current state of neither war nor peace, and to do so, we must make decisions based on prudence, expediency, wisdom and dignity. We are not going to bow our heads or submit humiliatingly before the enemy. With strength and logic, we can sit down and resolve the problems, and this is possible. We a

😁2211🤔4👍3👎2🤬1

22 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,110 views19 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

❗一 Kpler’s vessel-tracking data, shows zero west-to-east tanker crossings on Friday and zero barrels of oil exiting through the Strait, highlighting the enormous gap between Washington’s claims and independently observable traffic. @SimurghRes

18👍1

22 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,090 views46 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇱❌🇹🇷🇸🇾一 Israel must stop Erdogan’s military expansion before Turkey reaches its borders. —JP Jerusalem post report: The lessons Israel has learned in the West Bank, Gaza, Syria, Lebanon, and Iran apply to Turkey as well. From Idlib to Istanbul, Israel will attack, if necessary, not defend. @SimurghRes

🤣34🥰4😁3😡3💯1🤬1

22 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC≈1,060 views25 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇱❌🇱🇧— Israeli Air Force airstrike against Srebbine, southern Lebanon. @SimurghRes

🤬25

22 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,070 views40 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

🇮🇷🚀🇦🇪🇺🇸一 The UAE has built massive protective cages around fuel tanks at Dubai airport after one of those tanks was struck by an IRGC drone early in the war. Satellite images confirm construction began in May and was nearly complete by Aug. 20. Via: (@EGYOSINT) @SimurghRes

🤣38😁2

22 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,040 views62 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

If you see 40 ships transiting in this picture, I'll consider my self as a Jewish faggot @SimurghRes

🤣58💯4

22 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,060 views48 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🔹As the OSINT community has already demonstrated today, the Axios report claiming that around 40 ships passed through the Strait of Hormuz on Friday night is completely fabricated. In any case, traders no longer believe the words of American media outlets aligned with the government, so this attempt to drive down the price of Brent Crude Oil failed. @SimurghRes

33🤣9😁4👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 343 posts we hold for @SimurghRes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@SimurghRes edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 3,241 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Simurgh: An Eye on the Enemy” (@SimurghRes), 17,016 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SimurghRes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.