International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -198. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,870–18,128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 20:40
17,900
-14
15 Sept 2026, 16:57
17,914
-15
14 Sept 2026, 01:38
17,929
-9
12 Sept 2026, 09:18
17,938
-27
10 Sept 2026, 02:57
17,965
-19
6 Sept 2026, 21:20
17,984
+8
4 Sept 2026, 05:17
17,976
+11
2 Sept 2026, 20:18
17,965
+35
1 Sept 2026, 17:34
17,930
-9
31 Aug 2026, 16:18
17,939
-8
30 Aug 2026, 17:25
17,947
-12
29 Aug 2026, 20:37
17,959
-7
28 Aug 2026, 22:57
17,966
-11
27 Aug 2026, 21:14
17,977
-3
26 Aug 2026, 22:34
17,980
-8
25 Aug 2026, 21:33
17,988
-12
25 Aug 2026, 00:34
18,000
-20
23 Aug 2026, 15:09
18,020
-20
22 Aug 2026, 01:18
18,040
-13
20 Aug 2026, 21:35
18,053
first reading
Engagement
255 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.65%
avg views ÷ 17,900 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,190
86 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
86
of 255 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
255 (4 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
102,309
Reactions total
4,515
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 08:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 49m
Average length
1m 03s
Measured directly from 104 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,665 reactions across 242 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
2,448
19.3%
🤣
1,486
11.7%
🗿
1,100
8.69%
😁
1,089
8.60%
🤮
915
7.22%
👍
692
5.46%
👀
538
4.25%
🤬
536
4.23%
🫡
472
3.73%
⚡
450
3.55%
❤🔥
418
3.30%
🔥
314
2.48%
🙈
284
2.24%
👏
278
2.20%
💯
187
1.48%
🍾
175
1.38%
🎉
175
1.38%
🤔
144
1.14%
😭
125
0.987%
😐
108
0.853%
13 further kinds
731
5.77%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 253 of the 255 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,331 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 255 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 253 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tupireport. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 255 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇧🇷🌎🏙📊🦹♀️ — 📰 ZeroHedge: These Are The World's Safest (And Least Safe) Cities
August 31, 2026:
"Doha ranks as the safest major city in the world in 2026, while Caracas sits at the opposite end of the ranking.
This graphic, via Visual Capitalist's Dorothy Neufeld, compares the world’s safest and least safe major cities using Numbeo’s 2026 Safety Index. Scores are based on five years of user submissions covering perc…
🇺🇸💧🤝🇻🇪 — 📰 Bloomberg: Chevron Nears Deal for Two Oil Fields in Venezuela’s Orinoco
September 1, 2026:
"Chevron Corp. is finalizing a deal that will significantly expand its operations in Venezuela by adding two giant oil fields in the Orinoco Belt, part of a push by US President Donald Trump to ramp up production in the South American country.
The Texas oil company has negotiated operating rights to the fields in t…
🇧🇷🇧🇷⁉️📝⚖️ — Attorney General (PGR) Paulo Gonet, who has been mentioned in investigations of the same scope, is requesting the dismissal of the allegations made by Daniel Vorcaro in testimony to the office of Justice André Mendonça (STF); Paulo Gonet claims that the banker did not present concrete facts or minimum evidence that would justify opening investigations.
🇧🇷🏦❗️🤡👮 — Daniel Vorcaro stated, in testimony to the office of André Mendonça (STF), that he wants to PROVIDE INFORMATION on members of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's (PT) “current government” and mention a trip he allegedly took with Federal Police (PF) Director-General Andrei Rodrigues.
Admin comment:
— And for tonight’s big think: Given all these facts and connections, the crucial question remains—did Sicario really kill himself, or was he murdered? ❓
🇧🇷🏦💬 — In testimony to the office of Supreme Federal Court (STF) Justice André Mendonça, Daniel Vorcaro reported that he was placed in a box “like an animal” during his transfer by air while in Federal Police (PF) custody and claimed that officers had threatened to throw him out of the plane:
“We can throw you out of here. No one will doubt it if we say that you jumped.”
👮 He also stated that he suffered psychologi…
🇧🇷⚖️💬🤡 — Dean of the Supreme Federal Court (STF), Justice Gilmar Mendes reached out to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) with the intention of warning him about what he has referred to in conversations as a lack of support from government institutions for the leadership of the Federal Police (PF). Gilmar also asked for help to prevent André Mendonça's advances against Alexandre de Moraes.
🇧🇷🏛🤝⚖️👨⚖ — President of the Federal Senate Davi Alcolumbre comes to the defense of Supreme Federal Court (STF) Justice Alexandre de Moraes, after reportedly telling aides that he would only accept an impeachment if it were against André Mendonça:
“Everyone has forgotten that they asked the same person (Vorcaro) for R$130 million to make a film. And now the only person to blame is Justice Alexandre de Moraes. But I’…
🇧🇷⚖️👨⚖ — Photograph shows Supreme Federal Court (STF) Justices laughing after today's session. The moment comes amid the Court's biggest crisis in history. Cristiano Zanin, Alexandre de Moraes, Gilmar Mendes, and Edson Fachin are pictured. All of them are allies of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT).
🇧🇷 — Candidate and Senator Flávio Bolsonaro greets supporters during an event at Expointer, a nationally and internationally prominent agricultural fair.
🇧🇷⚖️❗️👮 — Justice André Mendonça of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) ordered the Federal Police (PF) to respect the “compartmentalization” of messages extracted from Daniel Vorcaro’s cellphone, restricting the agency’s leadership’s access to the investigation files.
🤡 Behind the scenes, the measure was interpreted as a message to Director-General Andrei Rodrigues, appointed by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT)…
🎉40🗿14👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 255 posts we hold for @tupireport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@tupireport named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@bralternativo_ named in 17 posts, 8 August 2026 – 1 September 2026
@flaviobolsonaro named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 – 1 September 2026
@cancilleria_ar named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
NetBlocks @netblocks · 48,809 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela @BellumActaNews · 114,627 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
/CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global @CIG_telegram · 115,452 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
Disclose.tv @disclosetv · 322,872 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
APOIO AO MARÇAL | FAZ O Ⓜ️ 2️⃣8️⃣ @MarcalPorSp28 · 74,600 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Molotov news @soymolotov · 43,193 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 28 August 2026
Police frequency @police_frequency · 69,996 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
Prof. Danuzio Neto - OSINT, Geopolítica e Atualidades (Intel BR - News) @profdanuzioneto · 121,313 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 August 2026
Leandro Twin @leandrotwin · 47,846 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 26 August 2026
Hoje no Mundo Militar - Canal @hojeno_mundomilitar · 90,212 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
War Noir @war_noir · 53,378 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸 @rnintel · 170,796 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Jovem Pan News @oficialjpnews · 45,955 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
Jair M. Bolsonaro 1 @jairbolsonarobrasil · 1,065,505 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
Brasil Paralelo @brasilparalelooficial · 57,332 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
Nikolas Ferreira @nikolasferreira · 192,070 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
Insider Paper @insiderpaper · 108,477 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Geopolitics Watch @GeoPWatch · 80,557 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
Project Veritas @project_veritas · 206,484 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Conflitos e Guerras Oficial @conflitoseguerrasoficial · 59,622 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
Mediterranean Man @medmannews · 76,827 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
O INFORMANTE @oinformanteof · 161,716 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 August 2026
Padre Paulo Ricardo @padrepauloricardo · 61,818 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026
Tommy Robinson News @TommyRobinsonNews · 75,617 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tupi Report 🇧🇷 • #FreeVenezuela” (@tupireport), 17,900 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tupireport.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.