Daqui a pouco entro na live para trocarmos uma ideia sobre o que realmente vale a pena na suplementação e como cada perfil deve usar cada suplemento. Daqui a pouco as 17:30 hs. https://youtube.com/live/6PJ_1uXSaDM?feature=share
❤2

Channel
@leandrotwin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
46,455subscribers
-2,754 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001542759909 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leandrotwin |
| Description | Grupo de estudos |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leandrotwin |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:41 | 46,455 | -42 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:31 | 46,497 | -40 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:29 | 46,537 | -27 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:15 | 46,564 | -20 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:28 | 46,584 | -26 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:50 | 46,610 | -35 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 46,645 | -38 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:28 | 46,683 | -33 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:35 | 46,716 | -25 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:31 | 46,741 | -21 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:48 | 46,762 | -37 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:26 | 46,799 | -40 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:31 | 46,839 | -14 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:50 | 46,853 | -43 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:00 | 46,896 | -23 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 46,919 | -30 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:44 | 46,949 | -15 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:39 | 46,964 | -31 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 02:16 | 46,995 | -10 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 23:45 | 47,005 | first reading |
53 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (2 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 32,377 |
| Reactions total | 69 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 21:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
522 reactions across 47 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 522 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 522 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Daqui a pouco entro na live para trocarmos uma ideia sobre o que realmente vale a pena na suplementação e como cada perfil deve usar cada suplemento. Daqui a pouco as 17:30 hs. https://youtube.com/live/6PJ_1uXSaDM?feature=share
❤2
🔥 Black Friday da minha consultoria de dieta e treino De sexta-feira, 06/11, ao meio-dia, até domingo, 08/11, às 23h59. Desconto em todos os planos (35% no anual!). Só 50 vagas. Anota o site: https://www.leandrotwin.com.br/ Já é meu aluno? Renove sem limite de vagas. O tempo novo soma ao seu plano atual.
❤7
Pessoal! Hoje tem live às 17:30. Muita gente tem dúvida sobre TREINO FULLBODY. Uns falam que é ruim, e outros gostam, mas para quem é o treino fullbody? Vamos ver hoje! Vou tirar todas as dúvidas. Entrem às 17:30: https://youtube.com/live/8VAG2KLzmYA?feature=share
❤13
Boa tarde pessoal! Veja a programação da semana: 26-10 Como ABAIXAR A PROLACTINA e MELHORAR A TESTOSTERONA https://youtu.be/iWuEsNCq1pc 27-10 OZIVY O MOUNJARO GENERICO - Já ouviu falar? https://youtu.be/Vl2AEWaHvWA 28-10 Aplicação de ÓLEOS LOCALIZADOS https://youtu.be/_2KCZNfoqpo 29-10 LIVE às 17:.30 30-10 13 coisas que ROUBAM SUA ENERGIA PARA TREINAR https://youtu.be/MoxEfBPPz0Q 31-10 EXERCÍCIOS para quem tem…
❤9
Daqui a pouquinho vou entrar ao vivo com vocês: https://youtube.com/live/4KTU0N2JOaw
❤9
Pessoal! Vou deixar para vocês a programação da semana: 13-10 Como escolher O MELHOR MULTIVITAMINICO https://youtu.be/uOz15BavVo8 14-10 PIORES ERROS que você pode cometer ANTES DE TREINAR https://youtu.be/YS1cFKw-4rE 15-10 6 ajustes simples que AUMENTAM MUITO A INTENSIDADE DO TREINO https://youtu.be/WHngmfSBln8 16-10 DIETA PARA QUEM TEM LIPEDEMA https://youtu.be/1haarSYnTwI 17-10 QUEM REALMENTE precisa suplement…
❤10
LIVE COM UMA MISSÃO HOJE PARA QUEM QUER PERDER A BARRIGA E DEFINIR PARA O VERÃO: https://youtube.com/live/OMVsEmZf1yo?feature=share Estou entrando em 20 minutos! Aguardo vocês. 🤘
❤7
A programação da semana para todos vocês: 05-10 Qual o MÍNIMO DE DIETA, TREINO E CARDIO para ter um corpo https://youtu.be/lwER-VDqGko 06-10 9 CONSELHOS PÉSSIMOS de dieta que TRAVAM SEUS RESULTADOS https://youtu.be/q0DiyvhhOyI 07-10 Entenda por que seu GLÚTEO NÃO CRESCE https://youtu.be/hIPxPC4c9Cw 08-10 LIVE 17:30 PILATES ajuda ou atrapalha quem faz MUSCULAÇÃO https://youtube.com/live/OdHYyHRNTOU 09-10 Treino F…
❤12
Leandro Twin pinned Deleted message
Foi bom? Como conseguiu? Estratégias
❤15
Resultado bom ou ruim? 3kgs de músculo e 3kgs de gordura em 1 mês, natural.
❤8
Programação da semana para vocês! 18 hs em dia de semana e às 12 hs no fim de semana. Aproveitem! 28-09 Como manter a TESTOSTERONA ALTA NATURALMENTE https://youtu.be/MxFK2AKtLWg 29-09 CANETA DE TESTOSTERONA é a revolução? https://youtu.be/17QhV3xZsOw 30-09 Combo final para QUEDA DE CABELO https://youtu.be/7ayUaTENoto 01-10 LIVE 18 hs Os 10 PIORES conselhos de TREINO que já ouvi na vida https://youtube.com/live/…
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @leandrotwin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@leandrotwin edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 5 posts on @leandrotwin as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Votem para o tema da live de amanhã às 17 hs:
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Enquete para a live de quinta às 18hs:
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Enquete para a live de quinta às 18hs:
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Enquete para a live de amanhã às 18 hs.
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Enquete para a live de hoje:
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Enquete para a live de hoje às 17 hs. Votação até 14 hs.
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Leandro Twin” (@leandrotwin), 46,455 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leandrotwin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.