Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bostil e Art

Channel

Bostil e Art

@bostil_art

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,811subscribers

-315 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001756298284
TypeChannel
Username@bostil_art
Description📍Canal dedicado à mostrar o lado ruim do bostil e do mundo. O lado bom os ADM's vivem!!!! Canal de Filmes: @FilmeArte Canal de Anime: @AnimesArte
Created7 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bostil_art

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,8057,1266,965.56 August 2026 — 7,126 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,125 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,116 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,100 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,109 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,102 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,101 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,100 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,084 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,060 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,046 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,017 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,992 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,974 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,942 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,928 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,892 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,886 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,872 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,858 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,839 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,821 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,829 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,805 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,811 subscribers6,8116 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -315. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,757–7,174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 15:276,811+6
2 Nov 2026, 22:156,805-24
30 Oct 2026, 22:466,829+8
27 Oct 2026, 19:566,821-18
24 Oct 2026, 17:466,839-19
21 Oct 2026, 23:176,858-14
18 Oct 2026, 21:056,872-14
15 Oct 2026, 23:276,886-6
12 Oct 2026, 19:066,892-36
6 Oct 2026, 06:416,928-14
29 Sept 2026, 06:206,942-32
19 Sept 2026, 03:376,974-18
15 Sept 2026, 00:226,992-25
11 Sept 2026, 07:367,017-29
6 Sept 2026, 18:167,046-14
2 Sept 2026, 13:087,060-24
30 Aug 2026, 21:277,084-16
27 Aug 2026, 13:347,100-1
24 Aug 2026, 10:067,101-1
20 Aug 2026, 13:577,102first reading

Engagement

133 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.30%
avg views ÷ 6,811 subscribers
Avg views / post
293
73 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
73
of 133 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 67 of 73 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held133 (26 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total21,394
Reactions total468
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 00:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,500
Videos
≈13,000
Links
≈1,750

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 08m
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 85 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

992 reactions across 119 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁25826.0%
🗿12812.9%
🤣12412.5%
👍12112.2%
❤353.53%
💊333.33%
🤡252.52%
👏242.42%
🖕242.42%
🔥212.12%
🙉191.92%
👌171.71%
✍161.61%
🤮161.61%
🥴161.61%
💅141.41%
🙈141.41%
🍌101.01%
😴101.01%
🙊101.01%
16 further kinds575.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 119 of the 133 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 992 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 73 posts held from the last 30 days (9.59%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 20:10 UTC226 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Aprende aí, Ancelloti

🗿1

Signed 𝔏𝔬𝔯𝔡 𝔐𝔦𝔱𝔥𝔯𝔞𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔯 ℭ𝔬𝔯𝔬𝔦𝔫𝔥𝔞

5 Nov 2026, 20:10 UTC160 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Não compre nem meia dessa baianada. Pague mais caro na internet, mas não financie esses desgraçados

👍4👌2

Signed 𝔏𝔬𝔯𝔡 𝔐𝔦𝔱𝔥𝔯𝔞𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔯 ℭ𝔬𝔯𝔬𝔦𝔫𝔥𝔞

5 Nov 2026, 19:46 UTC202 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Painho tirou da pobreza, compra um carro

👍7😁2

Signed 𝔏𝔬𝔯𝔡 𝔐𝔦𝔱𝔥𝔯𝔞𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔯 ℭ𝔬𝔯𝔬𝔦𝔫𝔥𝔞

5 Nov 2026, 19:33 UTC622 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Lança leite Premium ⭐️ @bostil_art

🖕5🔥2😁2

Signed 𝕸𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖆𝖑𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓𝖔

5 Nov 2026, 19:33 UTC163 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Anota aí desgraçado petista

🔥8

Signed 𝔏𝔬𝔯𝔡 𝔐𝔦𝔱𝔥𝔯𝔞𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔯 ℭ𝔬𝔯𝔬𝔦𝔫𝔥𝔞

5 Nov 2026, 19:33 UTC150 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Tem isso tb. Boicotar as empresas que patrocinam comunistas

👍8

Signed 𝔏𝔬𝔯𝔡 𝔐𝔦𝔱𝔥𝔯𝔞𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔯 ℭ𝔬𝔯𝔬𝔦𝔫𝔥𝔞

5 Nov 2026, 19:25 UTC156 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Opa, Tocantins tem homem!

🔥6

Signed 𝔏𝔬𝔯𝔡 𝔐𝔦𝔱𝔥𝔯𝔞𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔯 ℭ𝔬𝔯𝔬𝔦𝔫𝔥𝔞

5 Nov 2026, 19:12 UTC159 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Matemática básica: quanto mais armado um povo é menos impostos eles pagam.

👍6

Signed 𝔏𝔬𝔯𝔡 𝔐𝔦𝔱𝔥𝔯𝔞𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔯 ℭ𝔬𝔯𝔬𝔦𝔫𝔥𝔞

5 Nov 2026, 19:05 UTC129 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @MandalorianoConspiracyVideo

O Paraguai teve um presidente com culhões que para salvar a credibilidade das instituições renunciou a liderança. @MandalorianoConspiracy

🗿5🍌1

Signed 𝕸𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖆𝖑𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓𝖔

5 Nov 2026, 19:02 UTC161 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

“Recua fascista, recua” Não esqueça, foram eles que pediram

👍7

Signed 𝔏𝔬𝔯𝔡 𝔐𝔦𝔱𝔥𝔯𝔞𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔯 ℭ𝔬𝔯𝔬𝔦𝔫𝔥𝔞

5 Nov 2026, 17:26 UTC209 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Barrocas - BA Painho 79,32%

🙊7👌2

Signed 𝔏𝔬𝔯𝔡 𝔐𝔦𝔱𝔥𝔯𝔞𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔯 ℭ𝔬𝔯𝔬𝔦𝔫𝔥𝔞

5 Nov 2026, 17:14 UTC202 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Respostas padrão para dizer quando um vagabundo vim te pedir ajuda pq disse que está morrerendo de fome: Pede p Lula Pede p Wagner Moura Faz o L É só uma sensação Pede p Anita O importante é que a Janja almoçou

👍5

Signed 𝔏𝔬𝔯𝔡 𝔐𝔦𝔱𝔥𝔯𝔞𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔯 ℭ𝔬𝔯𝔬𝔦𝔫𝔥𝔞

Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @bostil_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@bostil_art edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 9 posts on @bostil_art as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
29 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𝙃𝙐𝙈𝙊𝙍 🦍 𝙉𝙀𝙂𝙍𝙊
@bullyingart2 · 54,418
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 24 August 2026
Proibido Olhar 🌒
@proibidoolhar · 70,741
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 20 August 2026
Memes Ruins para Alegrar seu Dia 😁
@Brasileiro_Memes · 49,848
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 25 August 2026
#𝗡𝗼𝗡𝘂𝘁𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲
@NoNutChallenge · 44,772
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 28 August 2026
Grupo VIP Barone
@baronepremios · 218,818
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 16 August 2026
Leandro Twin
@leandrotwin · 46,455
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 26 August 2026
Jovem Pan News
@oficialjpnews · 44,702
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
Hoje no Mundo Militar - Canal
@hojeno_mundomilitar · 89,073
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
O INFORMANTE
@oinformanteof · 163,231
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 August 2026
Jair M. Bolsonaro 1
@jairbolsonarobrasil · 1,032,820
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bostil e Art” (@bostil_art), 6,811 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bostil_art.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.