🇮🇷 🇺🇸 Two oil tankers were hit by mines in the Strait of Hormuz after turning off navigation systems and attempting an unauthorized route, according to the IRGC Navy. The vessels caught fire and were stopped; the IRGC says the strait remains closed. @WarCabinet #Iran #US

Channel
WarCabinet
@warcabinet
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,508subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002204389931 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @warcabinet |
| Description | WarCabinet delivers timely reporting, battlefield analysis, and intelligence-driven coverage of global conflicts. From breaking developments to strategic assessments, we provide the context behind the headlines. Contact/Feedback: @WarCabinetBot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 53 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/warcabinet |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 02:17 | 10,508 | -1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:07 | 10,509 | +1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:45 | 10,508 | -6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:06 | 10,514 | +1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:39 | 10,513 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:18 | 10,516 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:48 | 10,519 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:28 | 10,522 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 10,520 | -6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 10,526 | +56 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:26 | 10,470 | +21 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 10,449 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 10,450 | -1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 10,451 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 10,455 | -9 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:35 | 10,464 | +7 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:42 | 10,457 | +5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 10,452 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 10:48 | 10,455 | -6 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:19 | 10,461 | first reading |
Engagement
220 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.04%
- avg views ÷ 10,508 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 319
- 98 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.58%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 98
- of 220 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 94 of 98 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 220 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 31,265 |
| Reactions total | 480 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 08:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈8,790
- Videos
- ≈5,630
- Links
- ≈689
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 40m 58s
- Average length
- 52s
Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,770 reactions across 215 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 308 | 17.4% | |
| ❤ | 166 | 9.38% | |
| 🤣 | 147 | 8.31% | |
| 🤮 | 143 | 8.08% | |
| 🤡 | 132 | 7.46% | |
| 👏 | 93 | 5.25% | |
| 👍 | 91 | 5.14% | |
| 💔 | 83 | 4.69% | |
| 💯 | 73 | 4.12% | |
| 🔥 | 66 | 3.73% | |
| 🫡 | 55 | 3.11% | |
| 🥰 | 54 | 3.05% | |
| 🤔 | 43 | 2.43% | |
| 👎 | 41 | 2.32% | |
| 😁 | 41 | 2.32% | |
| 🎉 | 33 | 1.86% | |
| 🖕 | 33 | 1.86% | |
| 😢 | 29 | 1.64% | |
| 😱 | 28 | 1.58% | |
| 🤩 | 19 | 1.07% | |
| 18 further kinds | 92 | 5.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 216 of the 220 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,770 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 220 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 98 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🏴☠️ 🇵🇸 A Palestinian prisoner affairs expert said the Israeli Minister of Internal Security forced a handcuffed prisoner to paint his cell, calling it an attempt to break the spirit of Palestinians. Abd al‑Nasser Farwana: “The deliberate release of a video … is part of a campaign of repressive actions against Palestinian prisoners and a blatant violation of human rights.” Palestine I̶s̶r̶a̶e̶l̶ @WarCabinet #Pales…
🇵🇰 🇦🇫 The Pakistani army attacked a border post in Afghanistan following a cross-border clash with Taliban forces. Pakistan stated it will take military action until militant activities in Afghanistan are addressed, while the Taliban stated it has not allowed any group to operate against another country from Afghan territory. @WarCabinet #Pakistan #Afghanistan
🤮4
🇷🇺 🇺🇦 The Russian Ministry of Defense said it targeted a concentration point of the Ukrainian army in Zaporizhzhia and a power plant in Sumy. @WarCabinet #Russia #Ukraine
🏴☠️ 🇮🇷 Brent crude futures rose by more than two dollars to exceed one hundred dollars a barrel, according to reports. @WarCabinet #Iran
👍1
🇸🇦 Two explosions occurred in the city of Najran in southern Saudi Arabia. The Saudi Civil Defense Organization urged citizens to follow safety instructions and avoid gathering or taking pictures at the scene. @WarCabinet #SaudiArabia
🫡3
🇸🇦 🇾🇪 Alarm sirens sounded in the southern Saudi city of Najran, where the Saudi Arabian Civil Defense Organization announced the activation of warning systems. Arab sources reported hearing several explosions following the impact of a projectile fired from Yemen. @WarCabinet #SaudiArabia #Yemen
🫡2
🏴☠️ 🇵🇸 Adnan Tareq Al-Qareenawi, a child, was martyred yesterday afternoon by gunfire from the IOF east of the Bureij refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip. @WarCabinet #Palestine
🤬2💔1
🏴☠️ 🇵🇸 An explosion involving a robot occurred near the Al-Shuja'iya intersection in Gaza. @WarCabinet #Gaza
🤬2💔1
🏴☠️ 🇵🇸 The Israeli occupation army has detonated an explosive device, described as a "robot," east of the city of Gaza. @WarCabinet #Gaza #Palestine
🤬2💔1
🇮🇶 An attack in the Al-Mithaq district of Mosul targeted a member of the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), resulting in his immediate death. @WarCabinet #Iraq
🤬2🕊1
🏴☠️ 🇵🇸 Intense gunfire from IOF tanks was reported east of the Tufah neighborhood, east of Gaza City. @WarCabinet #Gaza #Palestine
🤬2
Showing the 12 most recent of 220 posts we hold for @warcabinet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@r3syst · 5,0574 postsResistance Toast🔻[Cyber Army]
@Resistancetoast · 17,8982 postsFNC English
@AkhbareFori_EN · 1,3031 postFotros Resistance
@FotrosResistancee · 68,3801 postGaza Daily Insights 🍉
@GazaDailyInsights · 13,7461 postNews from Sudan
@NewsfromSudan · 14,5061 postRNN Mirror
@Palresistmirror · 6,5631 post🚨 RNN Alerts
@RNN_Alerts · 2,6061 postIsrael Genocide Tracker
@TrackingIsraeliGenocide · 22,0551 postAl Mayadeen English
@almayadeenenglish · 18,1181 postKonuko News 🌎
@konuko_news · 2,5431 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@GiviDpr · 6,4904 postsJHArnous
@jharnous · 26,3504 postsGaza Daily Insights 🍉
@GazaDailyInsights · 13,7462 postsInfoDefenseENGLISH
@infodefENGLAND · 50,4032 postsمدرسة الحسينية
@al_hosseini72 · 1131 postEleições 2026 Memes
@eleicoesmemes · 10,0651 postMediterranean Man
@medmannews · 76,7401 postR3SYST
@r3syst · 5,0571 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@r3syst · 5,0573 postsAl-Qassam Toast [Cyber Army]
@Al_Qassam_Toast2 · 3,5552 postsResistance Toast🔻[Cyber Army]
@Resistancetoast · 17,8982 postsFNC English
@AkhbareFori_EN · 1,3031 postFotros Resistance
@FotrosResistancee · 68,3801 post𝕱𝖗𝖔𝖓𝖙𝖋𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖙 🇵🇸🔻🇱🇧
@frontflict · 9,4991 postNews from Sudan
@NewsfromSudan · 14,5061 postPax Celtica
@PaxCeltica · 1,3581 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AlHaqNews · 32,788
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
@jharnous · 26,350
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
@enemywatch · 28,928
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
@RezistanceTrench · 42,615
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
@FotrosResistancee · 68,380
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
@warmonitors · 151,006
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
@wfwitness · 80,969
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@LebUpdate · 75,863
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
@middle_east_spectator · 397,348
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@wc_israel · 21,094
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 September 2026
@GeoPWatch · 79,918
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
@iswnews_en · 21,400
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 September 2026
@medmannews · 76,740
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
@stayfreeworld · 40,800
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
@presstv · 92,682
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
@megatron_ron · 75,817
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
@Eyeonpalestine2 · 37,776
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 31 August 2026
@QudsNen · 111,830
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
@rnintel · 161,185
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
@Khamenei_en · 21,262
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026
@WarfareAnalysis · 31,167
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
@Irna_en · 25,849
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 September 2026
@me_observer_TG · 38,554
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
@tabzlive · 69,508
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WarCabinet” (@warcabinet), 10,508 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/warcabinet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.