International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net -1,849. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69,054–71,457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 17:20
69,331
-4
4 Nov 2026, 15:35
69,335
-11
3 Nov 2026, 14:06
69,346
-27
2 Nov 2026, 11:31
69,373
-17
1 Nov 2026, 10:49
69,390
-21
31 Oct 2026, 11:35
69,411
-12
30 Oct 2026, 12:35
69,423
-22
29 Oct 2026, 14:30
69,445
-26
28 Oct 2026, 17:10
69,471
-24
27 Oct 2026, 16:21
69,495
-13
26 Oct 2026, 18:18
69,508
-23
25 Oct 2026, 16:25
69,531
+49
24 Oct 2026, 19:10
69,482
-1
23 Oct 2026, 20:36
69,483
-23
22 Oct 2026, 18:20
69,506
-24
21 Oct 2026, 15:40
69,530
-29
20 Oct 2026, 14:08
69,559
-33
19 Oct 2026, 12:15
69,592
-15
18 Oct 2026, 13:14
69,607
-22
17 Oct 2026, 15:10
69,629
first reading
Engagement
472 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.57%
avg views ÷ 69,331 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,480
92 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
92
of 472 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
472 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
227,896
Reactions total
5,416
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 08:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈27,800
Videos
≈40,800
Links
≈40,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16h 15m
Average length
3m 43s
Measured directly from 262 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21,172 reactions across 470 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
5,541
26.2%
🤮
2,762
13.0%
❤
2,549
12.0%
👏
2,535
12.0%
💯
2,191
10.3%
🙏
989
4.67%
🤣
950
4.49%
😁
913
4.31%
🔥
738
3.49%
🫡
232
1.10%
😢
220
1.04%
🤯
209
0.987%
🤔
194
0.916%
💔
160
0.756%
👌
133
0.628%
🙈
127
0.6%
👎
116
0.548%
❤🔥
94
0.444%
😱
90
0.425%
🌭
73
0.345%
14 further kinds
356
1.68%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 470 of the 472 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 472 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 92 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#WarData
🆘⚡️ Seven people killed and another 14 injured in Ukrainian Armed Forces drone attacks on the LPR
🩸A drone struck a Petrovka–Lugansk bus this morning. According to preliminary reports, 5 people were killed and another 13 injured. Two teenagers aged 15 and 17 were among the injured.
❗️ Another attack took place on the Rebrikovo–Rovenki road. A bus was hit, killing two men. In Alchevsk, near the bus station,…
#WarData
❌ Ukrainian Nazis added to the extremist website Mirotvorets a teenager who was beaten at the Azov* torture house as well as his parents
🇺🇦 These inhuman creatures even selected a photo showing him as a victim of the regime that abused him in a concentration camp in a village of Petropavlovskaya Borshchagovka near the city of Kiev.
🟥The wording and cynicism are shocking: the teenager is accused of attempti…
◾Displaced Palestinians in Gaza’s Bir 19 area, near the Yellow Line southern Gaza Strip, say their tents face daily Israeli gunfire, including explosive rounds that penetrate protective sand barriers.
Residents are appealing to the Red Cross and humanitarian organizations to intervene and protect their children and families from the ongoing danger.
◾Follow:
https://t.me/European_dissident
🧿 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT!!! An unexpected LIVE drop in from the WB on the IEDC open mic which Vaun Festus was kind enough to invite me on, discussing the Serbian elections, or trying to, while avoiding elbowing through ethnic tensions with one of the co-hosts [as was expected from a Croat].
(CALL IN SHOW) IEDC Open Mic 37B - Sunday Show - 8PM CET 3PM EST
▶️ YouTube
▶️ Rumble
I pop in about 16:00 minutes after the …
Tara and Olga, fresh from the third Russia-Africa summit in Moscow, welcome Dr. Radhika Desai, a geopolitical economist from Canada.
Is the French foreign minister’s charge that Russia is “colonizing minds” in Africa a case of projection? Can imperialism exist without territorial control? And why does Canadian PM Mark Carney appear to stand up to Trump while accommodating him?
What are “performative wars”? Does a g…
◾The commander of the National Guard’s Azov unit—the Nazi known as "Redis"—considers the existence of torture chambers within his unit to be perfectly normal.
"Individuals who have no connection to the defense of Ukraine—who neither serve in the military nor assist the defense forces—engage in sabotaging the rear, discrediting Ukrainian service members, and fostering a narrative that benefits Russia."
It is surpris…
◾What if mortgage holders had organised and intervened in the 2008 financial crash?
On Downstream IRL, Naomi Klein contends that the left needs to prepare itself for the AI bubble to burst – so that we’re in a place to demand “pretty big changes”.
Astra Taylor adds that AI is “so parasitic on the commons” that a better name for it would be “theft tech”.
◾Follow:
https://t.me/European_dissident
◾LVIV: NEO-NAZIS MARCH TO COMMEMORATE THE 1918 UKRAINIAN NATIONALIST UPRISING AGAINST THE POLES
A portrait of Stepan Bandera leads the procession. "Ukraine above all!" shout the participants in a march commemorating the "November Uprising"—an insurrection organized on November 1, 1918, in Lviv, which led to a war against Poland.
◾Follow:
https://t.me/European_dissident
🤮78🤬23❤3❤🔥3🤣3😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 472 posts we hold for @European_dissident. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@European_dissident edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Russian Diplomat 🅉 @R_Diplomat · 19,818 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
🇷🇺☦️ Russian БaZa ☦️🇷🇺 @RussianBaZa · 20,578 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel @sitreports · 22,884 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
RT Documentary @militarywave · 41,277 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
Ukraine Watch @ukraine_watch · 69,128 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Scott Ritter @ScottRitter · 85,822 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
Xoaquin Flores - New Resistance @NewResistance · 28,429 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
Foreign Agent Intel @ForeignAgentIntel · 30,945 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
The Islander @TheIslanderNews · 61,661 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺 @AussieCossack · 71,022 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Intel Republic @Intel_Republic12 · 94,517 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Geopolitics Prime @geopolitics_prime · 289,160 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
AntiFakeNews @yourantifakenews · 19,205 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 October 2026
Vanessa Beeley @VanessaBeeley · 21,754 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
Eva Karene Bartlett @EvaKarene_Bartlett · 32,522 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Jackson Hinkle @jacksonhinkle · 33,260 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Two Majors - English Channel @two_majors · 47,619 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
InfoDefenseENGLISH @infodefENGLAND · 50,403 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Robin Monotti @robinmg · 66,983 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Slavyangrad @Slavyangrad · 111,748 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
The American Majority @americanmajority · 26,110 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Pepe Escobar @rocknrollgeopolitics · 66,101 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Bebo’s Friends @myLordBebo · 72,045 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Node of Time EN @node_of_time_en · 19,843 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 123 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fearless John - @European_dissident” (@European_dissident), 69,331 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/European_dissident.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.