International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -479. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,282–31,905 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 06:01
31,354
-6
5 Nov 2026, 06:26
31,360
-1
4 Nov 2026, 08:06
31,361
-11
3 Nov 2026, 07:09
31,372
-7
2 Nov 2026, 10:29
31,379
-1
1 Nov 2026, 10:29
31,380
-6
31 Oct 2026, 04:29
31,386
-4
30 Oct 2026, 03:06
31,390
-11
29 Oct 2026, 04:20
31,401
-12
28 Oct 2026, 03:57
31,413
-3
27 Oct 2026, 06:49
31,416
-6
25 Oct 2026, 05:17
31,422
+1
24 Oct 2026, 07:17
31,421
-11
23 Oct 2026, 04:49
31,432
-7
22 Oct 2026, 02:41
31,439
-18
20 Oct 2026, 21:56
31,457
-5
19 Oct 2026, 19:36
31,462
+17
18 Oct 2026, 20:38
31,445
-5
17 Oct 2026, 18:17
31,450
-6
16 Oct 2026, 15:41
31,456
first reading
Engagement
780 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 157 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.31%
avg views ÷ 31,354 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,670
311 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
312
of 780 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
780 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
517,878
Reactions total
9,337
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 10:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,600
Videos
≈11,600
Links
≈48,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
10h 18m
Average length
2m 06s
Measured directly from 295 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25,470 reactions across 770 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
6,973
27.4%
❤
6,160
24.2%
👏
3,973
15.6%
👎
3,905
15.3%
🔥
3,040
11.9%
🤬
396
1.55%
🥰
319
1.25%
👀
134
0.526%
🎉
85
0.334%
😁
85
0.334%
😡
72
0.283%
🤔
54
0.212%
😢
43
0.169%
🤷♂
35
0.137%
😎
23
0.09%
🌚
20
0.079%
👌
20
0.079%
😈
19
0.075%
🤯
19
0.075%
😍
18
0.071%
9 further kinds
77
0.302%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 776 of the 780 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,640 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 780 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 27 of 312 posts held from the last 30 days (8.65%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Rostec Develops Mobile Version of Citadel Anti-Drone System (Photos)
Russia's state arms conglomerate Rostec has developed a mobile version of its ZAK-30 Citadel anti-aircraft gun system, mounting its combat module and detection equipment on an armored vehicle chassis to allow faster deployment against drone attacks.
The company announced the development on November 6, saying the new configuration would enable the …
Ukraine Diverts Russian Reserves to Dnipropetrovsk
In the Dnipropetrovsk direction Ukrainian units are consolidating south of the Vovcha River, taking advantage of an extensive “grey zone” along the administrative boundary, while Russian groups conduct reconnaissance and search operations in the forest belts.
In the Sumy direction assault units of the “North” grouping are advancing in the areas of Khotyn and Ulanov…
Houthis Unleash Shoawaz Drones Against Saudi-Backed Forces in al-Jawf (Video)
Yemen’s Houthis (Ansar Allah) on November 5 released new footage showing first-person-view (FPV) suicide quadcopters striking Saudi-backed forces in al-Jawf province.
The footage shows strikes against military vehicles and troop concentrations across al-Jawf’s eastern desert. The Houthis said all the targets shown were hit directly.
The …
North Korea Pairs Air Defense Test With Cruise Missile Strike Drill (Photos)
North Korea has tested a newly designed air defense missile system and conducted a separate long-range cruise missile strike drill against a simulated airport, state media reported on November 5, as Pyongyang continued a series of weapons tests focused on strengthening its ability to counter South Korean and United States forces.
The offic…
Major Fire Hits Swiss Weapons Maker With Links to Ukraine (Photos)
A major fire at the Swiss arms manufacturer Brügger & Thomet (B&T AG) in the city of Thun is being investigated as a suspected arson attack, adding to a recent series of fires and explosions at European defense industry facilities connected to Ukraine’s military supply chain.
The fire broke out early on October 29 at a B&T building on Tempelstrasse.…
In Video: Russian Drones Lie in Wait on High-Voltage Lines
The Russian military has begun using high-voltage power lines as concealed positions for first-person view (FPV) suicide quadcopters, allowing the drones to wait for potential targets from elevated vantage points before launching attacks.
The tactic was first reported by Ukrainian military expert Serhii Beskrestnov, better known as Flash, in a November 5 po…
Saudi Arabia Seeks an Exit From Yemen, Houthis Demand $51 Billion in Compensation
Yemen’s Houthis (Ansar Allah) have demanded $51 billion from Saudi Arabia as compensation for years of military operations and a blockade, alongside formal recognition of their authority over Yemen, as the kingdom seeks to negotiate an end to renewed hostilities, The Wall Street Journal reported on November 5.
Citing people familiar w…
Russia Agreed to Supply Iran With 90 Launchers for LMUR Guided Missiles
Russia agreed to supply Iran with 90 launchers for an advanced precision-guided missile, the Financial Times reported on November 5, citing purported Russian defense-industry documents.
The deal, if the systems have been delivered, would give Tehran another precision-strike capability that could further tighten its grip on the Strait of Hormuz.…
Iran Is Shooting Down U.S. Drones Left and Right (Videos)
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) announced that it had intercepted two United States drones and taken control of two others within two days, in a series of engagements that point to growing challenges for American unmanned surveillance operations around the Strait of Hormuz.
On November 4, the IRGC Aerospace Force said it had shot down a U.S. …
Ukraine Rushes Reserves to Orikhiv as Russian Army Advances
In the Zaporozhye direction Russian units continue offensive operations in the Orikhiv area, where Ukrainian forces are offering fierce resistance and redeploying reserves.
In the Sumy direction assault groups of the “North” grouping are advancing in the areas of Khotyn and Ulanove, repelling counter-attacks by Ukrainian units.
In the Kharkiv direction Ru…
Military Situation In Ukraine And Ukrainian Attacks On Russian Territory On November 4, 2026 (Maps Update)
👎12🔥9👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 780 posts we hold for @southfronteng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@southfronteng edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 September 2026
Most recent edit
26 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
SouthFront(en.wikipedia.org) “…"{{Cite web |title=SouthFront: Analysis & Intelligence |url=https://t.me/southfronteng/37832 |access-date=2023-08-18 |website=Telegram |archive-date=18…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SouthFront: Analysis & Intelligence” (@southfronteng), 31,354 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/southfronteng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.