News, technical analysis, memes and thoughts.
Politically incorrect channel.
Undefined ideology, sympathetic to fascism and communism.
Channel bot to communicate admin:
@Right_People_the_bot
You can also use the option to send direct messages.
Created
21 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net +237. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,794–36,242 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 20:59
36,167
-16
16 Sept 2026, 13:18
36,183
-7
14 Sept 2026, 19:16
36,190
+11
13 Sept 2026, 06:36
36,179
+28
11 Sept 2026, 08:01
36,151
+100
8 Sept 2026, 14:01
36,051
-47
5 Sept 2026, 09:16
36,098
+12
3 Sept 2026, 09:03
36,086
+18
2 Sept 2026, 05:23
36,068
+103
1 Sept 2026, 03:59
35,965
-12
31 Aug 2026, 05:38
35,977
-21
30 Aug 2026, 02:04
35,998
-4
29 Aug 2026, 04:44
36,002
+41
28 Aug 2026, 05:15
35,961
-7
27 Aug 2026, 05:08
35,968
+51
26 Aug 2026, 02:24
35,917
+16
24 Aug 2026, 23:13
35,901
-33
23 Aug 2026, 09:27
35,934
-12
21 Aug 2026, 21:18
35,946
+97
20 Aug 2026, 15:18
35,849
first reading
Engagement
711 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.86%
avg views ÷ 36,167 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,030
378 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
378
of 711 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 374 of 378 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
711 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
390,755
Reactions total
13,111
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 13:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈44,300
Videos
≈22,400
Links
≈4,410
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 20m
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 295 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24,263 reactions across 692 posts, in 66 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,693
23.5%
🤣
2,794
11.5%
😁
2,657
11.0%
🤮
1,552
6.40%
🔥
1,440
5.93%
👍
1,319
5.44%
💩
996
4.11%
🤡
832
3.43%
👏
817
3.37%
🤬
710
2.93%
💯
484
1.99%
🥰
424
1.75%
❤🔥
413
1.70%
🫡
363
1.50%
⚡
296
1.22%
🙏
274
1.13%
😢
236
0.973%
🌭
229
0.944%
🤔
213
0.878%
👎
211
0.87%
46 further kinds
2,310
9.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 704 of the 711 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,817 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 711 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
80
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 711 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
30
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @the_Right_People. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 711 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Dobropillya direction. Information from the ground.
Area 1:
Russian forces are accumulating in the green boxes shown, east of Novooleksandrivka and southeast of Shevchenko, and using these positions to infiltrate north and northwest to Shevchenko, which they are currently entering in limited numbers. Russia does not appear to be focused on accumulating in Shevchenko due to the fact that there are practically no bui…
🇷🇺🤜🇺🇦 The Russian army “routinely” continues to engage enemy targets with combined strikes for the twenty-seventh consecutive day.
Strikes were carried out against Kiev, Krivoy Rog, Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk, Kremenchug, Pavlograd, Chernigov, and Kiev and Vinnitsa regions.
#info
🇰🇵 According to North Korean media, on September 20 the DPRK’s Missile Administration “successfully tested the latest weaponry of crucial importance to the development of weapons systems technology.”
The test involved the Hwasongpho-11Ma-1 missile system, a new modification of the already known Hwasongpho-11Ma. This therefore represents another stage in the development of the hypersonic missile weapons program.
The…
🇨🇳🇹🇷 Another episode of unmanned aerial warfare in Sudan. An AKINCI UAV operated by government forces shot down a CH-95 attack UAV belonging to the opposing Rapid Support Forces.
Essentially, this was an aerial engagement in which a large Turkish-made drone acted as an improvised interceptor against a large Chinese-made reconnaissance and strike drone.
Clearly, as the number of drones operated by both sides in the …
🇮🇷🤜🇺🇸 The IRGC released footage of air defense forces shooting down another reconnaissance and strike drone. In this case, it was a drone downed today and identified by the Iranians as an MQ-1E Gray Eagle.
#info
#Iran #SAM
#USA #UAV #MQ1
🇮🇱🤜🇸🇾 A spectacular explosion at an ammunition depot in Aleppo, Syria, last night.
Syrian authorities said the detonation was accidental, but this is already the fifth known incident involving an explosion at Syrian ammunition depots in just one month.
There are suspicions that a certain vigilant neighbor of Syria may indeed be behind these “accidents.”
#info
#Syria
#Israel
Quotidien des pilotes français de Normandie-Niémen à Bakhmout et Tchassov-Yar.
Повседневная жизнь французских пилотов Нормандии-Неман на Бахмуте и Часов-Яре.
@norm_nem : Diex Aïe !
🇷🇺🤜🇺🇦 Turning up the heat in the pocket
A Croatian RAK-SA-12 MLRS mounted on a HMMWV M1152A1 chassis was spotted in the Volchansk pocket.
The launcher was positioned in a camouflaged revetment in a wooded area north of Blagodatnoye. An FPV drone struck the position. Subsequent observation footage showed the launcher burning.
The Antagonist (“Антагонист”) group in action.
#info
#MLRS
#FPV
🇷🇺🤜🇷🇺 The worst possible luck.
A spent booster from a 9M335 surface-to-air missile fired by a Pantsir-S1 air defense missile and gun system, lodged in a car after repelling a Ukrainian drone raid on the capital region.
#info
#SAM
#Pantsir
😭35🤣12😢6👀4😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 711 posts we hold for @the_Right_People. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@the_Right_People named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@thewaltzofwar named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 · confirmed gone 10 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Gimbaled @gimbaled · 44,837 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 3 September 2026
Russians With Attitude @rwapodcast · 36,686 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
Intel Slava @intelslava · 390,719 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
MoD Russia @mod_russia_en · 94,794 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
World Pravda @worldpravda · 53,909 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
RT Documentary @militarywave · 41,264 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
Ukraine Watch @ukraine_watch · 68,923 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Slavyangrad @Slavyangrad · 113,042 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Two Majors - English Channel @two_majors · 47,018 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Suriyakmaps @Suriyak_maps · 46,914 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
UKR LEAKS_eng @ukr_leaks_eng · 75,501 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
War Leaks 18+ (Channel) @warleaks11 · 68,456 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
/CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global @CIG_telegram · 115,452 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
frontier_conflict @frontier_conflict1 · 25,534 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
The Duran @thedurancom · 51,949 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Military Summary @militarysummary · 77,350 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
AMK Mapping @AMK_Mapping · 58,716 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel @sitreports · 23,026 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺 @AussieCossack · 69,201 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
War Noir @war_noir · 53,378 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Mediterranean Man @medmannews · 76,827 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
Kremlin. News @news_kremlin_eng · 26,893 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
Victor vicktop55 @vicktop55 · 26,809 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
Rybar in English @rybar_in_english · 77,697 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Right People Z” (@the_Right_People), 36,167 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_Right_People.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.