🔥 No rotation. Only elimination A drone team of the Ivanovo-based paratroopers destroyed materiel and personnel of the enemy in Orekhov direction. 🔹 Russian Defence Ministry
👍23👏16🥰8🔥6🤬1

Channel
@mod_russia_en
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
93,864subscribers
-1,833 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001590534742 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mod_russia_en |
| Description | Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation News in Russian - @mod_russia Регистрация в перечне владельцев страниц в соцсетях: https://clck.ru/3F4uWm |
| Created | 5 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mod_russia_en |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:01 | 93,864 | -39 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 02:16 | 93,903 | -30 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 00:37 | 93,933 | -31 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:44 | 93,964 | -18 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:51 | 93,982 | -15 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:37 | 93,997 | -18 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:57 | 94,015 | -37 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:48 | 94,052 | -24 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:15 | 94,076 | -17 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 94,093 | -27 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 94,120 | -27 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 94,147 | -15 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:10 | 94,162 | -15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:08 | 94,177 | -16 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:29 | 94,193 | -16 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 94,209 | -29 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:04 | 94,238 | -42 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 94,280 | -16 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:01 | 94,296 | -19 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:54 | 94,315 | first reading |
1,649 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 194 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,649 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,251,054 |
| Reactions total | 58,077 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 21:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 582 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
118,996 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 44,744 | 37.6% | |
| 👍 | 43,904 | 36.9% | |
| 🔥 | 15,953 | 13.4% | |
| 🥰 | 12,992 | 10.9% | |
| 🤬 | 1,009 | 0.848% | |
| 😢 | 206 | 0.173% | |
| 😱 | 188 | 0.158% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118,996 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 September 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 37 of 505 posts held from the last 30 days (7.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔥 No rotation. Only elimination A drone team of the Ivanovo-based paratroopers destroyed materiel and personnel of the enemy in Orekhov direction. 🔹 Russian Defence Ministry
👍23👏16🥰8🔥6🤬1
Drones vs Infantry: one-sided fight 💥 UAV operators of the Tsentr Group of Forces neutralised manpower of AFU formations in Dnepropetrovsk direction. 🔹 Russian Defence Ministry
👏36🔥20👍13🥰8🤬1
❗️ The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue to carry out strikes using unmanned aerial vehicles against energy infrastructure facilities in Ukraine and vessels involved in supporting the AFU. 💥 In the daytime, the strikes hit: ▫️ the Kamenskaya 330 kV substation, which provided power to defence industry enterprises in Dnepropetrovsk region; ▫️ in the port of Chernomorsk (Odessa region), a container ship…
👍34🥰18👏16🔥4🤬1
Pure courage 🤝 For the courage and heroism shown in the battles in Dnepropetrovsk direction, servicemen of the 55th Separate Motorised Rifle Brigade (Mountain) of the Tsentr Group of Forces were presented with state and departmental awards. 🔹 Russian Defence Ministry
👍58👏41🥰14🔥9🤬1
Traffic went down to zero 💥 Strike UAV operators of the Vostok Group of Forces destroyed hostile aerials employed to control drones via Starlink satellite communication in Zaporozhye region. 🔹 Russian Defence Ministry
🔥45👏30👍16🥰4🤬1
Systematic demolition of positions 🔥 Drone pilots of the Yuzhnaya Group of Forces smashed two UAV control centres and a cover of Ukrainian manpower. 📍 Kramatorsk direction 🔹 Russian Defence Ministry
🔥47👍29👏18🥰8🤬1
🎖🎖 by Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 8 November 2026 Part 2 (👉 see Part 1) ↗️The Vostok Group of Forces continued to advance into the depths of the enemy's defence. Manpower and materiel of two assault brigades, four air assault brigades, two assault regiments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and two marine brigades have been hit close to Malinovka, Kolomiytsy, Brovki (Dnepr…
👏58👍35🔥9🥰8🤬1😱1
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. 📍The Sever Group of Forces improved its tactical situation. In Kharkov region, strikes were delivered at manpower and hardware of six mechanised brigades, a motorised infantry brigade, two unmanned systems brigades, and two assault regiments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Khatneye, Makarovo, Dolzhik, Shevchenkovo, Bugayevka, Mar…
👏46👍35🔥11🥰7🤬1
High-explosive jammer ⚔️ D-30 howitzers of the Vostok Group of Forces eliminated hostile UAV control centres in Zaporozhye region. 🔹 Russian Defence Ministry
👍61👏28🔥13🥰8🤬2
❗️ The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue to carry out strikes against Ukrainian fuel and energy infrastructure facilities used in the interests of the AFU, as well as maritime vessels involved in the delivery of military-related cargo. 💥 Last night, unmanned aerial vehicles hit a 330 kV substation near Beloshitsy of Zhitomir region, which supplied electricity to Ukrainian defence industry enterprises. …
👍50👏36🔥8🥰6🤬1
Every step gets the dawn closer. Keep working ▫️ 🔹 Russian Defence Ministry
👏82👍47🥰21🔥11😱2
📆 Top News Today 🚀 Towards stars: Russian Aerospace Forces successfully launched a Soyuz-2.1b medium-lift launch vehicle with a spacecraft in the interests of the Russian Ministry of Defense. 🔥 Working systematically: Russian elements continue to launch strikes against enemy defence industry facilities, power and transport infrastructure facilities, as well as vessels used to deliver military cargo. 💥 Leaving onl…
👏63👍27🔥16🥰8🤬2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,649 posts we hold for @mod_russia_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@mod_russia_en edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 2 posts on @mod_russia_en as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 68 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 72 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | No label recorded on this Wikidata item |
|---|---|
| Description | Wikinews article |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Hacker News
This handle was named 2 times in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MoD Russia” (@mod_russia_en), 93,864 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mod_russia_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.