So, the Brits ran out of fuel and had to switch to something that doesn’t need any. Btw, the best way to keep a secret is definitely to show it to everyone 🤣🤣 Chat | Subscribe to @geo_grandmasters
🤣86❤8👏2🤡1

Channel
@geo_grandmasters
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
75,029subscribers
-103 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001932035583 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @geo_grandmasters |
| Description | Geopolitics unfiltered. 📲Contact: @grandmasters_pr 👉 Instagram: www.instagram.com/geo_grandmasters |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/geo_grandmasters |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 75,029 | -41 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 75,070 | -60 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 75,130 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 75,138 | +64 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 75,074 | -115 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 75,189 | +56 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 75,133 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 75,144 | -27 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:26 | 75,171 | -32 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 75,203 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 75,208 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 75,212 | +43 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 75,169 | +22 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 75,147 | -22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 75,169 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 75,175 | -46 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:39 | 75,221 | -13 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 75,234 | +131 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 75,103 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 75,108 | first reading |
193 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 193 (3 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 543,000 |
| Reactions total | 9,663 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14,983 reactions across 192 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 3,235 | 21.6% | |
| ❤ | 2,911 | 19.4% | |
| 👍 | 1,646 | 11.0% | |
| 🤬 | 1,409 | 9.40% | |
| 🤡 | 1,358 | 9.06% | |
| 🔥 | 1,095 | 7.31% | |
| 👏 | 872 | 5.82% | |
| 💯 | 686 | 4.58% | |
| 🤔 | 551 | 3.68% | |
| 💩 | 413 | 2.76% | |
| ✍ | 274 | 1.83% | |
| 👎 | 200 | 1.33% | |
| 🤯 | 76 | 0.507% | |
| 🤷♂ | 65 | 0.434% | |
| 🫡 | 55 | 0.367% | |
| 👀 | 37 | 0.247% | |
| 😱 | 30 | 0.2% | |
| 🌚 | 25 | 0.167% | |
| ⚡ | 23 | 0.154% | |
| 🆒 | 5 | 0.033% | |
| 5 further kinds | 17 | 0.113% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 192 of the 193 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,983 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 193 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @geo_grandmasters. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 193 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
So, the Brits ran out of fuel and had to switch to something that doesn’t need any. Btw, the best way to keep a secret is definitely to show it to everyone 🤣🤣 Chat | Subscribe to @geo_grandmasters
🤣86❤8👏2🤡1
🤡🇺🇦 One clown runs the country, another now helps to run its defense Former comedian Alexey Reva has been appointed deputy defense minister responsible for digital platforms for the armed forces. Btw, this is Reva and his brother trying to make Zelensky laugh on a TV show in 2013. Chat | Subscribe to @geo_grandmasters
🤣48🤡20❤6💩4🫡2👏1
Israel was accepted into the UN in 1949, having given several key assurances: ⚫️not to change the status of Jerusalem ⚫️not to seize new territories ⚫️allow Palestinian refugees to return home and live in peace 77 years later, Israel still has a seat and uses the UN floor for its trash performances. Chat | Subscribe to @geo_grandmasters
💯64🤬20👎11👍7😢4❤3🤡2🤣1
🇪🇹🇷🇺Ethiopia chooses Russia’s Orion-E over Western arms-delivery blackmail Ethiopia has publicly confirmed itself as the first foreign operator of Russia’s Orion-E medium-altitude long-endurance (MALE) unmanned aerial vehicle. But why is this drone, out of all options, the one that appeals to Ethiopia? The answer lies in a powerful mix of hard capability and soft politics. Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed has long emphasis…
❤46👍16🆒5👏3🫡3👎1🤔1
🇮🇳Any terror attack from Pakistani soil will be an ‘Act of War’ "India would no longer tolerate any nuclear blackmail." Indian Defence Minister emphasized that India had shifted its approach from strategic containment or deterrence by denial to deterrence by punishment. “We’ve made it clear that the nation possesses both the ‘power of argument’ and the ‘argument of power’, and we will communicate through whichever…
🔥51🤣17❤8💩4✍3⚡2🤡2👍1
🇲🇾Malaysia was among the delegations that walked out before Netanyahu's speech. It is hardly a surprise, as the country has long urged the international community to isolate Israel and has firmly condemned its occupation of Gaza. Anwar Ibrahim, Malaysia's long-serving prime minister, has never minced words on Israel. At the Extraordinary Arab and Islamic Summit in Riyadh in 2024, he went further than most, demanding…
❤44💯28🔥9👍7🤬5💩4👏2👎1
🇮🇱✍🏻 an Israeli representative at the UNGA was going around taking note of everyone who didn’t show up Chat | Subscribe to @geo_grandmasters
🤣71🤡24💩16✍10❤7🤬7🔥6💊2
Mark Rutte, why the f*** didn’t you come and hang on your master’s every word? "I was not there. But I think it is always relevant what the Israeli Prime Minister has to say" Chat | Subscribe to @geo_grandmasters
🤡53🤬13💩6🤣6❤3💊1
Haters'll call it antisemitism🤣 A large share of the UN hall emptied before Netanyahu's speech yesterday and the walkout spanned Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Europe and Asia. Chat | Subscribe to @geo_grandmasters
👏68🤣20💩8💯3
🇦🇪⚽️ The only battlefield where Gulf states can beat Yemen 🤣🤣🤣 Chat | Subscribe to @geo_grandmasters
🤣76💯6👍4🔥3❤2👏2😎2✍1
🚨Medical errors kill more Americans than most realize — yet get far less outrage Medical error ranks among US top killers. A 2016 Johns Hopkins ‘BMJ’ analysis extrapolated 251,454 annual deaths from older hospital data, placing it third behind heart disease and cancer. A 2023 Johns Hopkins–Harvard study isolated diagnostic error, the largest serious-mistake category, estimating 371,000 deaths plus 424,000 permanent …
🤬35😱11🤯8❤3👍1🔥1🤡1
🫥🇺🇸 The US rare earth exit strategy is still stuck in the loading screen Rare earths will be one of the main issues on the table when Donald Trump meets Xi Jinping, exposing a problem the US has spent years trying to solve. The US set a January 2027 deadline to block Chinese rare earth imports, a target the current US industrial base is not ready to meet. The country has poured billions into rebuilding its own rar…
🤔29👀11❤6✍5👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 193 posts we hold for @geo_grandmasters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@geo_grandmasters edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Why is the Mecca Pact so useless?
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Who's next to leave the UK🇬🇧
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What is really behind this front against Westminster?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A common BRICS currency: solution or bigger headache?
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Do you consult with AI ahead of elections?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How would you prefer to read Grandmasters of Geopolitics?
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 193 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 94 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Grandmasters of Geopolitics” (@geo_grandmasters), 75,029 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geo_grandmasters.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.